long one due 5pm mtn time

OTL520

Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 5

Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points

Requirements Instructional design

considerations specific to

the selected organization

were present and included

adequate detail for all four

of the individual learning

preference topics presented

in the module:

• David Kolb’s four basic learning styles

• Ned Herrmann’s brain- based approach

• Visual, Auditor, & Kinesthetic (VAK) model

• Howard Gardner’s Multiple Intelligences

Instructional design

considerations specific to

the selected organization

were not included for one of

the individual learning

preference topics, or one of

the learning preference

topics did not include

enough detail.

Instructional design

considerations specific

to the selected

organization were not

included for two of the

individual learning

preference topics, or

two of the learning

preference topics did

not include enough

detail.

Instructional design

considerations

specific to the

selected organization

were not included for

three of the

individual learning

preference topics, or

three of the learning

preference topics did

not include enough

detail.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Content Demonstrates strong or

adequate knowledge of

learner preferences

presented in the module;

correctly represents

knowledge from the

readings and sources.

Some significant but not

major errors or omissions in

demonstration of

knowledge.

Major errors or

omissions in

demonstration of

knowledge.

Failed to

demonstrate

knowledge of the

materials.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Sources Cites and integrates two to

three credible sources as

specified in description.

Cites and integrates one

credible source as specified

in description.

Cites and integrates

sources, but each lacks

credibility or clear

application to the

assignment.

Cites and integrates

no sources.

Mechanics and Writing

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

college-level

proficiency in

organization,

grammar and

style.

Project is clearly organized,

well written, and in proper

format as outlined in the

assignment. Strong

sentence and paragraph

structure; few errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well

organized and written, and

is in proper format as

outlined in the assignment.

Reasonably good sentence

and paragraph structure;

significant number of errors

in grammar and spelling.

Project is poorly

organized; does not

follow proper paper

format. Inconsistent to

inadequate sentence

and paragraph

development;

numerous errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is not

organized or well

written, and is not in

proper paper format.

Poor quality work;

unacceptable in

terms of grammar

and spelling.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

proper use of

APA style

Project contains proper APA

formatting, according to the

CSU-Global Guide to Writing

and APA Requirements,

with no more than one

significant error.

Few errors in APA

formatting, according to the

CSU-Global Guide to Writing

and APA Requirements,

with no more than two to

three significant errors.

Significant errors in

APA formatting,

according to the CSU-

Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with

four to five significant

errors.

Numerous errors in

APA formatting,

according to the CSU-

Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with

more than five

significant errors.

Total points possible = 75