solutions pro

OTL520

Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 4

Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

21-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points

Requirements Instructional design

considerations specific to

the selected organization

were present and

included adequate detail

for all three of the

learning theory topics

presented in the module:

• Basic theories of learning

• Malcolm Knowles’ Adult Learning

• Individual Characteristics of

Learning

Instructional design

considerations specific to

the selected organization

were not included for one

theory of learning, or one

theory of learning did not

include enough detail.

Instructional design

considerations specific

to the selected

organization were not

included for two

theories of learning, or

two theories of learning

did not include enough

detail.

Instructional design

considerations

specific to the

selected organization

were not included for

three theories of

learning, or three

theories of learning

did not include

enough detail.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Content Demonstrates strong or

adequate knowledge of

adult learning theory

presented in the module;

correctly represents

knowledge from the

readings and sources.

Some significant but not

major errors or omissions

in demonstration of

knowledge.

Major errors or

omissions in

demonstration of

knowledge.

Failed to

demonstrate

knowledge of the

materials.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Sources Cites and integrates two

to three credible sources

as specified in

description.

Cites and integrates one

credible source as

specified in description.

Cites and integrates

sources but each lacks

credibility or clear

application to the

assignment.

Cites and integrates

no sources.

Mechanics and Writing

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

college-level

proficiency in

organization,

grammar and

style.

Project is clearly

organized, well written,

and in proper format as

outlined in the

assignment. Strong

sentence and paragraph

structure; few errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well

organized and written, and

is in proper format as

outlined in the assignment.

Reasonably good sentence

and paragraph structure;

significant number of

errors in grammar and

spelling.

Project is poorly

organized; does not

follow proper paper

format. Inconsistent to

inadequate sentence

and paragraph

development;

numerous errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is not

organized or well

written, and is not in

proper paper format.

Poor quality work;

unacceptable in

terms of grammar

and spelling.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

proper use of

APA style

Project contains proper

APA formatting,

according to the CSU-

Global Guide to Writing

and APA Requirements,

with no more than one

significant error.

Few errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with no

more than two to three

significant errors.

Significant errors in APA

formatting, according

to the CSU-Global

Guide to Writing and

APA Requirements,

with four to five

significant errors.

Numerous errors in

APA formatting,

according to the CSU-

Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with

more than five

significant errors.

Total points possible = 75