solutions pro only

OTL520

Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 3

Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence

Content, Research, and Analysis

29-35 Points 22-28 Points 15-21 Points 8-14 Points

Requirements All required components of

the needs assessment

were present and included

adequate detail, including:

• Stage 1: Business Needs (measure used

and outcome)

• Stage 2: Performance Needs (measure used

and outcome)

• Stage 3: Learning Needs (measure used

and outcome)

• Stage 4: Learner Needs measure used and

outcome).

The needs assessment was

missing one component or

one component did not

include enough detail (e.g.

measure used and

outcome for all four

stages: business,

performance, learning, or

learner needs).

The needs assessment

was missing two

components or two

components did not

include enough detail

(e.g. measure used and

outcome for all four

stages: business,

performance, learning,

or learner needs).

The needs

assessment was

missing three or

more components or

three or more

components did not

include enough detail

(e.g. measure used

and outcome for all

four stages: business,

performance,

learning, or learner

needs).

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Content Demonstrates strong or

adequate knowledge of

needs assessment

principles presented in the

module; correctly

represents knowledge

from the readings and

sources.

Some significant but not

major errors or omissions

in demonstration of

knowledge.

Major errors or

omissions in

demonstration of

knowledge.

Failed to

demonstrate

knowledge of the

materials.

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Sources Cites and integrates two to

three credible sources as

specified in description.

Cites and integrates one

credible source as

specified in description.

Cites and integrates

sources but each lacks

credibility or a clear

application to the

assignment.

Cites and integrates

no sources.

Mechanics and Writing

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

college-level

proficiency in

organization,

grammar and

style.

Project is clearly

organized, well written,

and in proper format as

outlined in the

assignment. Strong

sentence and paragraph

structure; few errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is fairly well

organized and written, and

is in proper format as

outlined in the

assignment. Reasonably

good sentence and

paragraph structure;

significant number of

errors in grammar and

spelling.

Project is poorly

organized; does not

follow proper paper

format. Inconsistent to

inadequate sentence

and paragraph

development;

numerous errors in

grammar and spelling.

Project is not

organized or well

written, and is not in

proper paper format.

Poor quality work;

unacceptable in

terms of grammar

and spelling.

OTL520

Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 3

9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points

Demonstrates

proper use of

APA style

Project contains proper

APA formatting, according

to the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with no

more than one significant

error.

Few errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with no

more than two to three

significant errors.

Significant errors in APA

formatting, according to

the CSU-Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with

four to five significant

errors.

Numerous errors in

APA formatting,

according to the CSU-

Global Guide to

Writing and APA

Requirements, with

more than five

significant errors.

Total points possible = 75