solutions pro long one
stella6459
otl520_ctrubric_mod02.pdf
OTL520
Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 2
Criteria Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence
Content, Research, and Analysis
21 -25 Points 16-20 Points 11-15 Points 6-10 Points
Requirements All required components of
the Organization Profile
and Analysis were present
and included adequate
detail, including:
• Name of Organization • Business Strategy
(Mission, Values, and
Goals)
• Business Drivers • Organizational Culture • Environmental Factors
Affecting the
Organization.
The Organization Profile
and Analysis was missing
one component or one
component did not include
enough detail (e.g., name
of organization, business
strategy, business drivers,
organizational culture, or
environmental factors
affecting the organization).
The Organization Profile
and Analysis was missing
two components or two
components did not
include enough detail
(e.g., name of
organization, business
strategy, business
drivers, organizational
culture, or environmental
factors affecting the
organization).
The Organization
Profile and Analysis
was missing three or
more components or
three or more
components did not
include enough detail
(e.g., name of
organization,
business strategy,
business drivers,
organizational
culture, or
environmental
factors affecting the
organization).
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Content Demonstrates strong or
adequate knowledge of
the principles of client
analysis for instructional
design presented as in the
module; correctly
represents knowledge
from the readings and
sources.
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions
in demonstration of
knowledge.
Major errors or
omissions in
demonstration of
knowledge.
Failed to
demonstrate
knowledge of the
materials.
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Rationale Provides strong thought,
analysis, and rationale of
how the selected design
model aligns with the
selected organization.
Some significant but not
major errors or omissions
in thought, analysis, and
rationale.
Major errors or
omissions in thought,
analysis, and rationale.
Failed to
demonstrate
thought, analysis,
and rationale.
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Sources Cites and integrates two to
three credible sources as
specified in description.
Cites and integrates one
credible source as
specified in description.
Cites and integrates
sources but each lacks
credibility or a clear
application to the
assignment.
Cites and integrates
no sources.
Mechanics and Writing
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Demonstrates
college-level
proficiency in
organization,
grammar and
style.
Project is clearly
organized, well written,
and in proper format as
outlined in the
assignment. Strong
sentence and paragraph
structure; few errors in
grammar and spelling.
Project is fairly well
organized and written, and
is in proper format as
outlined in the assignment.
Reasonably good sentence
and paragraph structure;
significant number of
errors in grammar and
spelling.
Project is poorly
organized; does not
follow proper paper
format. Inconsistent to
inadequate sentence and
paragraph development;
numerous errors in
grammar and spelling.
Project is not
organized or well
written, and is not in
proper paper format.
Poor quality work;
unacceptable in
terms of grammar
and spelling.
OTL520
Critical Thinking Rubric - Module 2
9-10 Points 7-8 Points 5-6 Points 3-4 Points
Demonstrates
proper use of
APA style
Project contains proper
APA formatting, according
to the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with no
more than one significant
error.
Few errors in APA
formatting, according to
the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with no
more than two to three
significant errors.
Significant errors in APA
formatting, according to
the CSU-Global Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with four
to five significant errors.
Numerous errors in
APA formatting,
according to the CSU-
Global Guide to
Writing and APA
Requirements, with
more than five
significant errors.
Total points possible = 75
