Need in 24 hours
Madhukar
module3_grade_feedback_062714.docRubric Name: Undergraduate Generic Case and SLP Grading Rubric - Nov 4, 2013
|
|
Criteria Level 4 - Excellent Level 3 - Proficient Level 2 - Developing Level 1 - Emerging Score and Feedback Assignment-Driven Criteria 25 points Demonstrates mastery covering all key elements of the assignment in a substantive way. 22 points Demonstrates considerable proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment.
Demonstrates partial proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment. 14 points Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency covering all key elements of the assignment. 18 points Critical Thinking 10 points Demonstrates mastery conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated thoroughly; conclusions are logically presented with appropriate rationale. 9 points Demonstrates considerable proficiency conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and evaluated proficiently; conclusions are presented with necessary rationale.
Demonstrates partial proficiency conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and partially evaluated conclusions are somewhat consistent with the analysis and findings. 6 points Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency conceptualizing the problem, and viewpoints and assumptions of experts are analyzed, synthesized, and limited or poorly evaluated conclusions are either absent or poorly conceived and supported. 7 points Scholarly Writing 5 points Demonstrates mastery and proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience.
Demonstrates considerable proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience. 3 points Demonstrate partial proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience. 2 points Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency in scholarly written communication to an appropriately specialized audience. 4 points Quality of References and Assignment Organization 7 points Demonstrates mastery using relevant and quality sources and uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work. 6 points Demonstrates considerable proficiency using somewhat appropriate sources and demonstrates considerable proficiency in using appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work. 5 points Demonstrates partial proficiency using occasionally appropriate sources and partially uses appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work.
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency using sources and appropriate and does not use appropriate, relevant, and compelling content to support ideas, convey understanding of the topic and shape the whole work. 4 points Citing Sources 3 points Demonstrates mastery using in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography). 2 points Demonstrates considerable proficiency using of in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography). 1 point Demonstrates partial proficiency using in-text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography).
Demonstrates limited or poor proficiency using text citations of sources and properly format full source information in the reference list (bibliography). 0 points Overall Score Level 4 45 or more Level 3 40 or more Level 2 35 or more Level 1 0 or more Score and Feedback Overall Score
33 points
|
Feedback
|
Score |
|
|
20 / 30 - |
|
|
Feedback Date |
|
|
Jun 23, 2014 5:12 PM |
|
|
Dropbox Feedback |
|
|
I would like to see more than just a chart. The chart is helpful, but I would like to read your analysis. |
