FOR BABER MAKAYLA ONLY

profiledarfla
professor_lab_report_example.docx

Pipe Flow Metering Laboratory MECH 4400 Date: 8/31/12 Submitted To: Mr. Jason Bolyard Submitted By: Students Name

Pipe Flow Metering Laboratory

Jason Bolyard

Abstract

The goal of this laboratory was to compare the mass flow measurements made by several different devices. Two rotameters, an orifice plate, and a positive displacement meter were used to measure the flow rate of air through a flow loop. Different volumetric flow rates and regulated pressures were used to evaluate the change in error associated with each. Errors from 25 to 55% were found for the different flow meters when compared to the positive displacement meter. The error in the rotameter flow rates seemed to increase with increased flow rate and regulated pressure. The opposite trend was found for the orifice plate.

Nomenclature

PDM

Positive Displacement Meter

ACFM

Actual Cubic Feet Per Minute

SCFM

Standard Cubic Feet Per Minute

Ps

Standard Pressure

RHs

Standard Relative Humidity

VPs

Saturated Vapor Pressure of water at standard temperature

Ta

Actual Temperature

Pa

Actual Pressure

Pb

Barometric Pressure

RHa

Actual Relative Humidity

VPa

Saturated Vapor Pressure at Actual Temperature

Ts

Standard Temperature

C

Orifice Discharge Coefficient

d

Diameter of Orifice

∆P

Differential Pressure Across Orifice

ρf

Density of Fluid

β

Orifice Diameter divided by Pipe Diameter

Table of Contents

Abstract 1

Nomenclature 2

Table of Contents 3

List of Tables 3

List of Figures 3

1 Introduction 4

2 Experimental Setup 4

3 Procedures 6

4 Experimental Results 7

5 Conclusions and Recommendations 9

References 9

A. Appendix A 10

List of Tables

Table 4 1: Mass Flow Rates 8

Table 4 2: Mass Flow Rate % Errors 8

List of Figures

Figure 2 1: Flow Measurement Rig[1] 5

Figure 2 2: Rotameter [2] 6

Figure 2 3: Positive Displacement Meter [3] 6

Figure 4 1: Flow Device % Error 8

Introduction

Volumetric and mass flow rates are an important aspect of fluid mechanics. Most industrial, commercial, and residential facilities have a need to measure mass and volume flow of various fluids. In industrial application the flow rate of fluids are used to monitor and control processes. In commercial and residential applications flow rates may be used to measure the total amount of different fluids for billing purposes. In this laboratory flow rate measurements of air were taken using four separate devices. Two rotameters an orifice plate and a positive displacement meter. The positive displacement pump (PDM) was used as the excepted value for mass flow rate. All of the other flow measurement devices were compared to the PDM based on the conservation of mass principle. Flow measurements were taken at different flow rates and also at different regulated pressures.

Experimental Setup

The different flow measurement devices were connected in a series configuration using 1.065 inch pipe. A pressure regulator is installed upstream of the flow measurement devices. The pressure regulator is connected to a shop air supply and is used to adjust the pressure entering the flow measurement rig. A diagram of the flow measurement rig can be seen in Figure 21. The air flow first enters rotameter 1 where the volumetric flow rate can be observed directly off of the meter in standard cubic feet per minute. A thermocouple and pressure gauge are placed at the exit of rotameter 1. The air then passes through the orifice plate where the differential pressure is measured with a pressure gauge. Flow measurement is then measured once again with a rotameter labeled as rotameter 2. An additional thermocouple and pressure gauge is found at the exit of rotameter 2. Lastly the air passes through a PDM before the air exits into the atmosphere.

The rotameters and orifice plate are both indirect methods of measuring flow rate. The rotameter uses a float inside of a tube with a varying area [2]. An example of a rotameter can be seen in Figure 22. The forces acting on the float are weight, drag, and buoyancy. The weight and buoyancy forces are constant for any flow rate. The drag force is proportional to velocity. As flow increase the velocity at a given location in the tube will also increase. The float will experience an unbalanced drag force and will rise in the tube until the velocity decreases to a point where the drag force is balance by the weight and buoyancy force. The scale on the rotameter is normally calibrated for flow rate. The orifice plate is an abrupt reduction in the flow area. As the flow area decreases the velocity must increase and the pressure will decrease. The drop in pressure is measures and can be used to calculate the flow rate through the meter using Bernoulli’s Equation.

The PDM is a direct flow measurement method. There are many different types of PDM’s but all operate on the same basic theory. Internal components of the meter are in the path of the flow to be measured and cycle periodically [3]. Each cycle of the components represents a certain volume of flow. Figure 23 shows a two lobed rotor type of PDM. As the flow passes through the PDM the rotors rotate and the number of rotations can be counted. The number of rotations over time can be used to calculate flow rate.

Figure 21: Flow Measurement Rig[1]

Figure 22: Rotameter [2]

Figure 23: Positive Displacement Meter [3]

Procedures

Atmospheric pressure and temperature of the laboratory were taken and recorded. The initial sensor readings were taken with a regulated pressure of 10psi. The flow adjustment on rotameter 1 was used to adjust the flow rate to 5 scfm. Pressure and temperature readings were taken at the exit of rotameter 1 and 2. A flow measurement was also taken at rotameter 2. The differential pressure of the orifice plate and PDM were observed and recorded. Finally the amount of time needed to pass 1000 cubic feet of air through the PDM was measured and recorded. The same readings were then taken for 10 and 15 scfm. The regulated pressure was then adjusted to 20psi were an additional set of readings were taken at 15scfm.

The mass flow rate of each device was calculated and reported in pounds mass per second. The volumetric flow rate for the PDM was calculated by dividing the known volume of 1000ft3 by the time recorded for each flow rate. The mass flow rate was then calculated by multiplying the volumetric flow rate by the density at the exit of rotameter 2. The mass flow rate for each of the rotameters was calculated by multiplying the actual volumetric flow rate by the density indicated at the exit of the rotameter. The actual volumetric flow rate was calculated using Equation 1. The orifice plate mass flow rate was calculated by converting the collected data to metric units and using Equation 2. The density of the fluid was inferred by the pressure and temperature data at the exit of rotameter 1. Each of the flow rates where compared to the flow rate obtained from the PDM using Equation 3.

Equation 1

Equation 2

Equation 3

Experimental Results

The mass flow rates for each flow meter can be seen in Table 41. The mass flow rates ranged from 0.38 lbm/s to 3.21lbm/s. For all the measurement devices except rotameter 1 the increase in regulated pressure also increased the mass flow rate. The percent error found in each of the flow rates can be seen in Table 42. The percent errors ranged from 33 to 47% for rotameter 1, 26 to 33% for rotameter 2, and 48 to 55% for the orifice plate. The trend of the absolute values of error with respect to flow rate can be seen in Figure 41. Both rotameters showed an increase of error as the flow rate was increased. The error in the orifice plate reading showed a decrease in error as flow rate was increased. The regulated pressure increase resulted in an increase of error for the rotameters and a decrease for the orifice plate.

Regulated Pressure

Volumetric Flow Rate

Rotameter 1

Rotameter 2

Orifice Plate

PDM

psi

scfm

lbm/s

lbm/s

lbm/s

lbm/s

10

5

0.38

0.42

0.88

0.57

10

10

0.76

0.90

1.92

1.30

10

15

1.14

1.30

2.90

1.89

20

15

1.14

1.45

3.21

2.15

Table 41: Mass Flow Rates

Regulated Pressure

Volumetric Flow Rate

Rotameter 1

Rotameter 2

Orifice Plate

psi

scfm

% error

% error

% error

10

5

-33.02

-26.33

54.80

10

10

-41.30

-30.74

47.57

10

15

-39.34

-31.25

53.64

20

15

-46.78

-32.59

49.49

Table 42: Mass Flow Rate % Errors

Figure 41: Flow Device % Error

Conclusions and Recommendations

Overall the flow measurement devices showed a relatively high amount of error when compared to the PDM. The rotameters had a percent error around 25 to 45%. The orifice plate error ranged from around 45 to 50%. The magnitude of error seemed to be proportional to the flow rate for the rotameters and inversely proportional to flow rate for the orifice plate. The same trend was true for an increase in regulated pressure. All flow measurement devices will have some amount of error, but the errors found would most likely be unacceptable. The error in the rotameters could be from human error in reading the meter. Additional error could come for the conversation of the standard volumetric flow rate to an actual mass flow rate. Any inaccuracies in the pressure and temperature measurements used for this conversion would contribute to the overall error. The same factors could also affect the measurement made by the orifice plate. The measurement made by the PDM is also susceptible to error because the timing of the known displaced volume could have been slightly inaccurate. The error in the timing of the flow through the PDM affects the magnitude of the error in all the other flow meters. The PDM is the trusted value in this laboratory and its accuracy is very important. The PDM could possibly be more accurate if the human error in timing was eliminated. An additional flow measurement device could also be used to check the accuracy of the PDM. Accuracy of all the flow meters would benefit from a thorough calibration of all sensors used in this laboratory.

References

Angle, Gerald, “Experiment 1-Pipe Flow Metering,” MAE 534 Lab Handout.

Lee, T.W., Thermal and Flow Measurements, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2008.

Wheeler, Anthony J., Ganji, Ahmad R., Introduction to Engineering Experimentation, Pearson, Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2010.

A. Appendix A

Add appendices if needed

10

÷

÷

ø

ö

ç

ç

è

æ

÷

÷

ø

ö

ç

ç

è

æ

-

-

=

a

s

a

a

a

a

b

s

s

s

P

T

P

T

VP

RH

P

VP

RH

P

SCFM

ACFM

4

2

1

2

4

b

r

p

-

D

=

·

f

P

Cd

m

%

100

%

´

-

=

ExactValue

ExactValue

alValue

Experiment

Error

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

55

60

0246810121416

Flow Rate (scfm)

% Error

Rotameter 1Rotameter 2OrificeLinear (Rotameter 2)Linear (Rotameter 1)Linear (Orifice)