|
Articulation of Response (clarity, organization, word usage, ease of understandability)
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
No evidence of response to prompt
|
Weak articulation of response
|
Adequate articulation of response
|
Skillful articulation of response
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
|
|
Accuracy of Mechanics (grammar, punctuation, spelling)
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
Presence of several major errors that disrupt the meaning or flow of response
|
Presence of a few major errors and/or many minor errors that interfere with clarity of the response
|
Presence of a few minor errors; absence of readily detectable major errors
|
Absence of readily detectable major or minor errors
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
|
|
B. Lesson Plan Components
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The lesson plan does not present information for each component of the lesson plan format.
|
The lesson plan presents information for each component of the lesson plan format, but some or all of the information is inappropriate.
|
Not applicable.
|
The lesson plan presents appropriate information for each component of the lesson plan format.
|
|
Criterion Score: 4.00
Comments on this criterion: The lesson plan contains appropriate information.
|
|
B. Lesson Plan Alignment
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The lesson plan’s instructional plan/sequence of instruction and student assessment do not align with the standards and objectives.
|
The lesson plan presents flawed alignment between the instructional plan/sequence of instruction and student assessment and the standards and objectives
|
Not applicable.
|
The lesson plan presents alignment between the instructional plan/sequence of instruction and student assessment and the standards and objectives.
|
|
Criterion Score: 4.00
Comments on this criterion: Alignment is present.
|
|
B. Lesson Plan Instructional Plan/Sequence of Instruction
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The lesson plan presents an instructional plan/sequence of instruction that does not meet the lesson’s objective(s).
|
The lesson plan presents a flawed and/or inappropriate instructional plan/sequence of instruction to meet the lesson’s objective(s).
|
The lesson plan presents a workable instructional plan/sequence of instruction to meet the lesson’s objective(s).
|
The lesson plan presents a consistent and appropriate instructional plan/sequence of instruction to meet the lesson’s objective(s).
|
|
Criterion Score: 2.00
Comments on this criterion: The content is workable, but each component is missing the approximate time each may take.
|
|
B1. Use of Different Types of Media
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate’s lesson plan does not include the use of different types of media.
|
Not applicable.
|
Not applicable.
|
The candidate’s lesson plan includes the use of different types of media.
|
|
Criterion Score: 4.00
Comments on this criterion: Effective use of different types of media.
|
|
D. Level of Objectivity
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
Evidence of inappropriate subjectivity, limited objectivity, or bias
|
Limited evidence of objectivity
|
Adequate evidence of appropriate objectivity
|
Strong evidence of appropriate objectivity
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
|
|
D. Fluent Use of Relevant Educational Terminology
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
No evidence of use and/or application of relevant terminology
|
Weak use and/or application of relevant terminology
|
Adequate use and application of relevant terminology
|
Frequent use and application of relevant terminology
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
|
|
D1a. Instructional Setting
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not describe the instructional setting.
|
The candidate provides an imprecise description of the instructional setting.
|
The candidate provides a reasonable description of the instructional setting.
|
The candidate provides a precise description of the instructional setting.
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
Comments on this criterion: The instructional setting is clearly described.
|
|
D2a. Deviation From Prepared Lesson Plan
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not explain any deviation from the prepared lesson plan.
|
The candidate provides an illogical explanation regarding deviation from the prepared lesson plan.
|
The candidate provides a logical explanation regarding deviation from the prepared lesson plan.
|
The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation regarding deviation from the prepared lesson plan.
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
|
|
D3a. Pedagogical Strategy and Self-Directed Learning
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not explain how a pedagogical strategy used in the lesson relates to self-directed learning.
|
The candidate provides an illogical explanation of how a pedagogical strategy used in the lesson relates to self-directed learning.
|
The candidate provides a logical explanation of how a pedagogical strategy used in the lesson relates to self-directed learning.
|
The candidate provides a credible and well-supported explanation of how a pedagogical strategy used in the lesson relates to self-directed learning.
|
|
Criterion Score: 1.00
Comments on this criterion: Self-directed learning used in the lesson is explained. Direct teaching and group work are listed as the pedagogical strategies used in the lesson. Take one of the pedagogical strategies and explain how it relates to self-directed learning.
|
|
D4a. Effectiveness of Media Incorporation
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not evaluate how effectively different media were incorporated into the lesson presentation.
|
The candidate provides an implausible evaluation of how effectively different media were incorporated into the lesson presentation.
|
Not applicable.
|
The candidate provides a plausible evaluation of how effectively different media were incorporated into the lesson presentation.
|
|
Criterion Score: 1.00
Comments on this criterion: The different types of media are described. The different types of media need to be evaluated for effectiveness. Describe if some media were more effectively utilized than others and why.
|
|
D4b. Explanation of Thinking Process
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not provide an explanation of personal thinking process used to complete the evaluation.
|
Not applicable.
|
Not applicable.
|
The candidate provides an explanation of personal thinking process used to complete the evaluation.
|
|
Criterion Score: 1.00
Comments on this criterion: Once the media are appropriately evaluated, explain the thinking process went through to complete that evaluation.
|
|
D5a. Alternative Approach
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not explain an alternative approach to teaching an art lesson that could positively affect student performance.
|
The candidate provides an illogical explanation of an alternative approach to teaching an art lesson that could positively affect student performance.
|
The candidate provides a logical explanation of an alternative approach to teaching an art lesson that could positively affect student performance.
|
The candidate provides a credible and well-founded explanation of an alternative approach to teaching an art lesson that could positively affect student performance.
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
Comments on this criterion: A valid alternative approach is explained.
|
|
D5b. Justification of Recommendations
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not provide a justification of choice of recommendations.
|
Not applicable.
|
Not applicable.
|
The candidate provides a justification of choice of recommendations.
|
|
Criterion Score: 4.00
|
|
D6a. Ability to Modify Teaching Methods
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not predict how this experience might affect personal ability to modify teaching methods to improve instruction.
|
The candidate provides an implausible prediction of how this experience might affect personal ability to modify teaching methods to improve instruction.
|
Not applicable.
|
The candidate provides a plausible prediction of how this experience might affect personal ability to modify teaching methods to improve instruction.
|
|
Criterion Score: 4.00
|
|
D6b. Explanation of Considerations
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate does not explain what was considered regarding personal and/or professional implications.
|
Not applicable.
|
Not applicable.
|
The candidate explains what was considered regarding personal and/or professional implications.
|
|
Criterion Score: 4.00
|
|
E. Sources
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
If the candidate uses sources, the candidate does not provide in-text citations and/or references for each source used.
|
If the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and/or references with major deviations from APA style.
|
If the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and/or references with minor deviations from APA style.
|
If the candidate uses sources, the candidate provides appropriate in-text citations and/or references with no readily detectable deviations from APA style, OR the candidate does not use sources.
|
|
Criterion Score: 4.00
|
|
General Teaching Dispositions as Indicated in the Teachers College Code of Ethics
|
|
(1) Unacceptable
|
(2) Needs revision
|
(3) Meets standard
|
(4) Exemplary
|
|
The candidate demonstrates inappropriate professional teaching dispositions.
|
The candidate demonstrates questionable professional teaching dispositions.
|
The candidate demonstrates appropriate professional teaching dispositions.
|
The candidate demonstrates fully developed professional teaching dispositions.
|
|
Criterion Score: 3.00
|
Favouritewriter
lal242512013artscore.docx
0
