History Help
General Education History Written Assignment Rubric
Criteria
Excellent (A – A-) Good (B+ - B-) Satisfactory (C+ - C-) Developing (D+ and below)
Format / Submission 5 percent
Paper neatly typed and formatted according to assignment guidelines.
Proper cover page
Paper saved according to standard guideline – lastname.course.assignment
(4.5 – 5 points)
Paper typed and formatted according to assessment guidelines with few errors.
Title page missing one or two required elements.
Paper saved according to standard guideline – lastname.course.assignment
(4.0 – 4.4 points)
Paper typed and formatted with some errors.
Title page missing more than two of the required elements.
Paper saved using vague filename.
(3.5 – 3.9 points)
Paper typed with numerous errors.
Format guidelines not followed.
No title page
Paper saved with vague file name.
(0 – 3.4 points)
Analysis/Argument and Tone (Purpose / Thesis) 15 percent
Appropriate topic for paper length.
Focused with a clear, insightful, informed thesis.
Forceful and persuasive argument amply supported by carefully chosen and weighed facts.
Evidence of sophisticated comprehension of historical context and causality.
The writing is consistently professional and appropriate for an academic paper.
(13.5 - 15 points)
Topic is good but too large / narrow for paper length.
Thesis is clear.
Good argument supported by cited facts.
Sensitivity to historical context and causality.
The tone is generally professional. For the most part, it is appropriate for an academic paper.
(12 – 13.4 points)
Topic is considerably too large / narrow for paper length and / or marginally related to the course.
Thesis is not clear.
Paper organized more toward chronology than analysis and argument.
The tone is not consistently professional or appropriate for an academic paper.
(10.5 – 11.9 points)
Topic is considerably too large / narrow for paper length and / or marginally related to the course.
Simple chronology with no discernable argument.
Logical and factual errors.
Significant problems with understanding of historical content.
The tone is unprofessional and not appropriate for an academic paper. (0 – 10.4 points)
General Education History Written Assignment Rubric
Content 35 percent
Relevant and legitimate information clearly supports the argument and shows a thoughtful, in-depth analysis of a significant topic.
The reader gains important insights.
Demonstrates the author gained in-depth new knowledge about the topic.
(31.5 – 35 points)
Information provides reasonable support for the argument and displays evidence of a basic analysis of the topic.
The reader gains some important insights.
Demonstrates the author gained solid new knowledge about the topic and significance of events.
(28– 30.5 points)
Information supports the argument at times.
Analysis is basic or general.
The reader gains a few important insights.
Demonstrates the author gained some new knowledge about the topic and the significance of events.
(24.5 – 27.9 points)
The argument not clearly identified.
Analysis is vague or not evident.
Reader is confused or may be misinformed; important insights are not evident.
Demonstrates that author gained minimal new knowledge about the topic.
(0 – 24.4 points)
Research and Documentation 15 percent
Two or more relevant primary / secondary sources demonstrating extensive, in- depth research.
No tertiary sources.
Little reliance on tertiary sources.
Sources skillfully incorporated into the paper at all necessary points.
Citations from at least two sources.
Citations and bibliography follow the Chicago Manual of Style.
(13.5 - 15 points)
Two or more relevant primary / secondary sources revealing adequate research.
No tertiary sources.
Sources appropriately referenced in the paper.
Citations from at least two sources.
Citations and bibliography do not follow the Chicago Manual of Style but an attempt was clearly made to do so.
(12 – 13.4 points)
One or no relevant secondary sources; one or no primary sources.
More than one tertiary source.
Some facts not referenced.
Several citation errors.
Citations from at least two sources.
Citations and bibliography do not follow the Chicago Manual of Style and no attempt made to do so.
(10.5 – 11.9 points)
No relevant secondary sources, no primary sources. Over reliance on tertiary sources.
No sources
Spotty documentation of facts.
Pattern of citation errors.
One or less citation and one or less source.
Citation from only one source.
No citations and / or no bibliography.
(0 – 10.4 points)
General Education History Written Assignment Rubric
Organization and Style 15 percent
The ideals logically support the purpose or argument.
They flow smoothly from one to another and clearly linked to each other.
The reader can follow the line of reasoning.
Concise introduction with clear thesis.
Extremely well organized and supported argument.
Cogent, summative conclusion.
(13.5 - 15 points)
The ideas logically support the central purpose or argument.
Ideas usually clearly linked to each other.
For the most part, the reader can follow the line of reasoning.
Concise introduction with clear thesis.
Organized and appropriate examples.
Conclusion does not summarize the point.
(12 – 13.4 points)
In general, the writing is logical, although occasionally ideas fail to make sense together.
The reader is fairly clear about what the writer intends.
Introduction weak.
Organization weak.
Conclusion weak. (10.5 – 11.9 points)
The writing is not logically organized. Frequently, ideas fail to make sense together. The reader cannot identify a line of reasoning and loses interests.
Little evidence of coherent organization
(0 – 10.4 points)
Grammar / Spelling 15 percent
Paper essentially free of grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
(13.5 - 15 points)
A few grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
(12 – 13.4 points)
Pattern of grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Sentences awkwardly constructed causing the reader occasional distraction.
(10.5 – 11.9 points)
Severe grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors.
Errors in sentence structure are frequent enough to be a major distraction to the reader.
(0 – 10.4 points)