Interagecy Relationship IP2

Assignment Expectations

HLS315 Week 2 Individual Project

The following grading criteria will apply to this assignment:

Strategies and the Global War on Terror (GWOT)

Points Grading Criteria

41–45

Exceeds Expectations: Relevant use of vocabulary and applied thorough response; demonstrates full understanding of the articulation of the HSEM strategies enacted since 2001 with regard to the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT); explains whether or not the strategies define clear organizational roles and responsibilities.

36–40

Meets Expectations: Demonstrates very good understanding; did not answer all details in full. Missing some minor aspects.

32–35

Progressing: Comprehension is not demonstrated in report. Work could be improved upon; key aspects are missing.

27–31

Improvement Needed: Work does not meet expectations. Comprehension is not demonstrated or relevant to topic. Partially addresses topics.

< 27

Unsatisfactory: Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.

Homeland Security

Presidential Directives and Lead Agencies

Points Grading Criteria

36–40

Exceeds Expectations: Relevant use of vocabulary and applied thorough response; demonstrates full understanding of homeland security and emergency management roles and responsibilities of federal organizations that do not fall within the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) with regard to the various HSPDs.

32–35

Meets Expectations: Demonstrates very good understanding; did not answer all details in full. Missing some minor aspects.

28–31

Progressing: Comprehension is not demonstrated in report. Work could be improved upon; key aspects are missing.

24–27

Improvement Needed: Work does not meet expectations. Comprehension is not demonstrated or relevant to topic. Partially addresses topics.

< 24

Unsatisfactory: Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.

Homeland Security and Emergency

Management Challenges and

Focus

Points Grading Criteria

36–40

Exceeds Expectations: Relevant use of vocabulary and applied thorough response; demonstrates full comprehension of challenges present for agency coordination during incident response operations; explains the focus of the new environment with regard to all-hazards and terrorism.

32–35

Meets Expectations: Demonstrates very good understanding; did not answer all details in full. Missing some minor aspects.

28–31

Progressing: Comprehension is not demonstrated in report. Work could be improved upon; key aspects are missing.

24–27

Improvement Needed: Work does not meet expectations. Comprehension is not demonstrated or relevant to topic. Partially addresses topics.

< 24

Unsatisfactory: Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.

Paper Professionalism

Points Grading Criteria

9–10

Exceeds Expectations: Relevant use of vocabulary and applied thorough response; paper is free of grammatical errors and formatted in a structured and professional manner; all sources are referenced using APA style.

8

Meets Expectations: Demonstrates very good understanding; did not answer all details in full. Missing some minor aspects.

7

Progressing: Comprehension is not demonstrated in report. Work could be improved upon; key aspects are missing.

6

Improvement Needed: Work does not meet expectations. Comprehension is not demonstrated or relevant to topic. Partially addresses topics.

< 6

Unsatisfactory: Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.

Assignment Grading Scale

Total Points Assignment Grade 127–135 A 122-126 A-

116-121 B+ 112-115 B 108-111 B- 103-107 C+ 99-102 C 95-98 C- 88-94 D+ 81-87 D 0-80 F