Interagecy Relationship IP1

Assignment Expectations

HLS315 Week 1 Individual Project

The following grading criteria will apply to this assignment:

Jurisdiction Overview and

Strategy

Points Grading Criteria

41–45

Exceeds Expectations: Relevant use of vocabulary and applied thorough response; jurisdictional information regarding overview and HSEM strategy is thorough and accurate.

36–40

Meets Expectations: Demonstrates very good understanding; did not answer all details in full. Missing some minor aspects.

32–35

Progressing: Comprehension is not demonstrated in report. Work could be improved upon; key aspects are missing.

27–31

Improvement Needed: Work does not meet expectations. Comprehension is not demonstrated or relevant to topic. Partially addresses topics.

< 27

Unsatisfactory: Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.

Elements of Local Homeland

Security and Emergency

Management Strategy

Points Grading Criteria

72–80

Exceeds Expectations: Relevant use of vocabulary and applied thorough response; demonstrates full understanding of the selected jurisdictions strategy in terms of the NSHS, scope, state and federal incorporation, private sector participation, agency leadership, and interagency coordination.

64–71

Meets Expectations: Demonstrates very good understanding; did not answer all details in full. Missing some minor aspects.

56–63

Progressing: Comprehension is not demonstrated in report. Work could be improved upon; key aspects are missing.

48–55

Improvement Needed: Work does not meet expectations. Comprehension is not demonstrated or relevant to topic. Partially addresses topics.

< 48

Unsatisfactory: Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.

Paper Points Grading Criteria

Professionalism

9–10

Exceeds Expectations: Relevant use of vocabulary and applied thorough response; paper is free of grammatical errors and formatted in a structured and professional manner; all sources are referenced using APA style.

8

Meets Expectations: Demonstrates very good understanding; did not answer all details in full. Missing some minor aspects.

7

Progressing: Comprehension is not demonstrated in report. Work could be improved upon; key aspects are missing.

6

Improvement Needed: Work does not meet expectations. Comprehension is not demonstrated or relevant to topic. Partially addresses topics.

< 6

Unsatisfactory: Minimal effort; does not demonstrate comprehension; missing relevant information.

Assignment Grading Scale

Total Points Assignment Grade 127–135 A 122–126 A- 116–121 B+ 112–115 B 108–111 B- 103–107 C+ 99–102 C 95–98 C- 88–94 D+ 81–87 D 0–80 F