Criminal Justice
latifsd
exam_3.docWhich doctrine allows police to search an automobile without a warrant if a delay might result in a loss of evidence?
|
|
|
A. Fruit of the Poisoned Tree Doctrine |
|
|
B. Silver Platter Doctrine |
|
|
C. Carroll Doctrine |
|
|
D. Mapp Doctrine |
|
|
Question 2 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
The courts have supported drug testing of police officers based on drug abuse/use when what is present?
|
|
|
A. probable cause |
|
|
B. an anonymous tip |
|
|
C. proof beyond a reasonable doubt |
|
|
D. a reasonable suspicion |
|
|
Question 3 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
Which United States Supreme Court case extended the powers of the police to search vehicles for drugs with a trained dog without the need for any particular reason to suspect a narcotics violation?
|
|
|
A. Carroll v. United States |
|
|
B. Illinois v. Caballes |
|
|
C. Florida v. Jimeno |
|
|
D. Harris v. United States |
|
|
Question 4 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
The pat-down search was established in the case of __________.
|
|
|
A. Terry v. Ohio |
|
|
B. Carroll v. United States |
|
|
C. Chimel v. California |
|
|
D. Harris v. United States |
|
|
Question 5 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
Whether the crime involves attacks against computer systems or the information they contain or more traditional offenses like murder, money laundering, trafficking, or fraud, what type of evidence is becoming increasingly important?
|
|
|
A. hearsay |
|
|
B. interrogation |
|
|
C. exclusionary |
|
|
D. electronic |
|
|
Question 6 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
On occasion, a person may be tricked into consuming an intoxicating substance. This may support a defense known as __________.
|
|
|
A. necessity |
|
|
B. entrapment |
|
|
C. involuntary intoxication |
|
|
D. duress |
|
|
Question 7 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
In which case did the U.S. Supreme Court state that considerations of public safety can override and negate the need for rights advisement prior to limited questioning?
|
|
|
A. Mapp v. Ohio |
|
|
B. Miranda v. Arizona |
|
|
C. New York v. Quarles |
|
|
D. Terry v. Ohio |
|
|
Question 8 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
What did Chimel v. California establish?
|
|
|
A. that officers can search the person arrested and the area under that person’s “immediate control” incident to an arrest |
|
|
B. the good-faith exception |
|
|
C. the plain-view doctrine |
|
|
D. that officers can conduct emergency warrantless searches |
|
|
Question 9 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
Which of the following is not a justification for emergency warrantless searches?
|
|
|
A. danger of escape |
|
|
B. danger of the removal or destruction of evidence |
|
|
C. danger to life |
|
|
D. danger to property |
|
|
Question 10 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
Which of the following situations would not allow a search under the public safety exception for searches without a warrant?
|
|
|
A. searches of airline passengers in a terminal |
|
|
B. searches of student lockers in a school |
|
|
C. searching phone records of a local robbery suspect |
|
|
D. searching subway passengers |
|
|
Question 11 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
What division of a police department investigates charges that officers are guilty of wrongdoing?
|
|
|
A. strategic investigations |
|
|
B. intelligence |
|
|
C. internal affairs |
|
|
D. officer supervision |
|
|
Question 12 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
To elicit a confession, police departments cannot hire professionals skilled in the art of psychological manipulation because of the decision in which case?
|
|
|
A. Miranda v. Arizona |
|
|
B. Escobedo v. Illinois |
|
|
C. Arizona v. Fulminate |
|
|
D. Leyra v. Denno |
|
|
Question 13 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
A police officer can gather evidence without a warrant when it is clearly visible. This is known as a what?
|
|
|
A. consent to search |
|
|
B. plain-view search |
|
|
C. search of an automobile |
|
|
D. pat-down search |
|
|
Question 14 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
In Illinois v. Gates the Court held that “there is a fair probability that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place” exists when there is what?
|
|
|
A. fruit of the poisoned tree |
|
|
B. the good-faith exception |
|
|
C. probable cause |
|
|
D. a reasonable suspicion |
|
|
Question 15 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
What did Tennessee v. Garner specify the conditions for?
|
|
|
A. when a police officer can be fired |
|
|
B. when a police officer can accept gifts |
|
|
C. when deadly force could be used to apprehend a suspected felon |
|
|
D. when police behavior is deemed corrupt |
|
|
Question 16 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
What rule stipulates the requirements for introducing evidence and defines the qualifications of an expert witness and the nature of the testimony he or she may give?
|
|
|
A. exclusionary rule |
|
|
B. fruit of the poisoned tree doctrine |
|
|
C. rules of evidence |
|
|
D. material witness rule |
|
|
Question 17 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
Which amendment requires that evidence must be obtained by police with the use of a valid search warrant issued by a judge or searches may be based on probable cause?
|
|
|
A. Tenth Amendment |
|
|
B. Third Amendment |
|
|
C. Fifth Amendment |
|
|
D. Fourth Amendment |
|
|
Question 18 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
A legal principle that excludes any evidence obtained as a result of an illegal search or seizure is known as what?
|
|
|
A. latent evidence |
|
|
B. good faith exception |
|
|
C. compelling interest |
|
|
D. fruit of the poisoned tree doctrine |
|
|
Question 19 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
Which U.S. Supreme Court case required states to use the exclusionary rule?
|
|
|
A. Mapp v. Ohio |
|
|
B. Weeks v. United States |
|
|
C. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United States |
|
|
D. Wolf v. Colorado |
|
|
Question 20 of 20 |
5.0 Points |
Evidence that is illegally collected in a criminal case will be declared inadmissible under which rule?
|
|
|
A. the Miranda rule |
|
|
B. the exclusionary rule |
|
|
C. the Weeks rule |
|
|
D. the Mapp rule |
|
