| AMBA650 | Case Analysis Rubric |
| Total Points Possible | Grading Criteria |
| 90-100 | • Superior analysis: Identifies all or most of the key issues presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects strong critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes all or most of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are supported by data from all or most of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Data are creatively manipulated and applied. Discussion and recommendations are presented clearly, logically, and succinctly with no or few grammatical or other errors. Discussion/analysis reflects strong understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant, discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are followed. |
| 85-89 | • Good analysis: Identifies many of the key issues presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects good critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes many of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are supported by data from many of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Discussion and recommendations are presented clearly, logically, and succinctly with only occasional grammatical or other errors. Discussion/analysis reflects good understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant, discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are followed. |
| 80-84 | • Adequate analysis: Identifies some of the key issues presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects adequate critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes some of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are supported by data from some of the relevant case facts and exhibits data. Discussion and recommendations are generally presented clearly, logically, and succinctly but with some occasional lapses in clarity or with grammatical or other errors. Discussion/analysis generally reflects adequate understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials. Where relevant, discussion/analysis employs proper APA style. Length limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are generally followed. |
| 79-0 | • Unsatisfactory analysis: Identifies few or none of the key issues presented by the case. Discussion of issues reflects poor critical thinking and analytical skill. Discussion/analysis makes few or none of the recommendations called for by the case issues. Recommendations are not supported or are inadequately supported by data from the relevant case facts and exhibits. Discussion and recommendations are not presented clearly, logically, and succinctly and contain many problematic/confusing statements or recurring grammatical or other errors. Discussion/analysis reflects little or no understanding of principles presented in course readings/materials. Discussion/analysis fails to employ consistently proper APA style. Length limitations and other form/format requirements (if any) are not followed or inadequately followed. |
| Your score: |
| Comments: |
KStylezx83
case_analysis_rubics.xls
