two problems on Costing allocation and Planning&Budgeting

profileammcllagraphy
ise304.02-132-lec26-ch11-costallocation.pdf

Cost Allocation

Lecture 26

Chapter 11 * Modified from PPT slides of McGraw-Hill/Irwin

Joint Cost Allocation

Joint Cost

Joint Products

Split-Off Point

Cost of a manufacturing process

with two or more outputs

Outputs from a common input

and common production process

Stage of processing that

separates two or more products

Joint Cost

Recap of what we covered last class

Joint Cost, Continued. . .

Joint Cost Flows

Mining Costs:

$270,000

Split-off

Point Hi-Grade Coal: 15,000 units

Sales Value $300,000

Lo-Grade Coal: 30,000 units

Sales Value $450,000

Carlyle Coal Company

Recap of what we covered last class

Allocation of Joint Costs

Net realizable value method

Physical quantities method

Joint cost allocation based on the proportional

values of the products at the split-off point.

Joint cost allocation based on measurement of the volume,

weight, or other physical measure of the joint products at the split-off point.

Recap of what we covered last class

Example: NRV Method

Carlyle Coal Company Joint Cost Allocation NRV Method; no additional processing costs

Hi-Grade Lo-Grade Total

Final sales value 300,000$ 450,000$ 750,000$

Less additional processing costs -0- -0- -0-

Net realizable value at split-off point 300,000$ 450,000$ 750,000$

Porportionate share

$300,000/$750,000 40%

$450,000/$750,000 60%

Allocated joint costs

$270,000 x 40% 108,000$

$270,000 x 60% 162,000$

Recap of what we covered last class

Example: NRV Method, Continued. . .

Hi-Grade Lo-Grade Total

Sales value 300,000$ 450,000$ 750,000$

Less allocated joint costs 108,000 162,000 270,000

Gross margin 192,000$ 288,000$ 480,000$

Gross margin as a percent of sales 64% 64% 64%

Carlyle Coal Company Gross Margin Computations

Example: Estimating NRV

When no sales value exists for outputs at the split-off point, the

Estimated NRV should be determined.

Further Processing of Coal: Cost Flows

Mining

Costs:

$270,000

Split-off

Point

Hi-Grade Coal: 15,000 units

Sales Value $300,000

Lo to Mid-Grade Coal: 30,000 units

Mid-Grade Sales Value

$550,000

$50,000 Processing costs

Sales Value ?

Example: Estimating NRV, Continued. . .

Carlyle Coal Company Gross Margin Computations

Using NRV

Hi-Grade Lo-Grade Total

Sales value 300,000$ 550,000$ 850,000$

Less additional processing cost - 50,000 50,000

Estimated NRV at split-off 300,000$ 500,000$ 800,000$

Joint cost allocation: 101,250 a

101,250

- 168,750 b

168,750

Gross margin 198,750$ 331,250$ 530,000$

Gross margin as percent at sales 66% 60% 62%

a ($300,000/$800,000) x $270,000

b ($500,000/$800,000) x $270,000

Physical Quantities Method

Joint cost allocation based on measurement

of the volume, weight, or other physical

measure of the joint products at the split-off

point.

Significant processing occurs between the split-off point and

the first point of marketability.

Product prices are not set by the market.

Output product prices are unstable.

Example: Physical Quantities Method

Carlyle Coal Company Joint Cost Allocation

a (15,000 tons/45,000 tons) x $270,000 = 33.3% x $270,000

b (30,000 tons/45,000 tons) x $270,000 = 66.7% x $270,000

Physical Quantities Method

Hi-Grade Lo-Grade Total

Quantity (tons) 15,000 30,000 45,000

Allocation of joint costs 90,000 a

180,000 b

270,000

Sell or Process Further

Suppose CCC can sell lo-grade coal for

$450,000 at the split-off point or process it

further to make mid-grade coal. Mid-grade

coal would be sold for $550,000 and

additional processing costs would be

$50,000.

Sell Process Further Differential

Lo-Grade Mid-Grade Revenue/Costs

Revenues 450,000$ 550,000$ 100,000$

Less separate processing costs -0- 50,000 50,000

Margin 450,000$ 500,000$ 50,000$

$50,000 net gain from processing further

By-products

By-products are outputs of joint production

processes that are relatively minor in quantity

or value.

Joint Cost

Upstream

Costs:

$XXXXXX

Split-off

Point

Gasoline

Diesel Oil

Benzene

Jet A-1

Kerosene

Crude Oil

Gas

By-products

By-products are outputs of joint production

processes that are relatively minor in quantity

or value.

The net realizable value from sale of the

by-product is deducted from the joint

costs before allocation to the main

products.

The proceeds from sale of

the by-product are treated

as other revenue.

Method 1 Method 2

Example: By-products – Method One

Hi-Grade Lo-Grade By-product Total

Sales value 300,000$ 450,000$ 15,000$ 765,000$

Less additional processing costs -0- -0- -0- -0-

Net realizable value at split-off point 300,000$ 450,000$ 15,000$ 765,000$

Deduct sales value of by-product a

-0- -0- (15,000) (15,000)

Allocate remaining joint costs a

(102,000) b

(153,000) c

-0- (255,000)

Gross margin 198,000$ 297,000$ -0- 495,000$

Gross margin as a percent of sales 66% 66% 0% 65%

a Joint costs adjusted for sales value of by-product

b $300,000/$750,000 or 40% x ($270,000 - $15,000)

c $450,000/$750,000 or 60% x ($270,000 - $15,000)

Carlyle Coal Company By-Product

Example: By-products – Method Two

Hi-Grade Lo-Grade By-product Total

Sales value 300,000$ 450,000$ 15,000$ 765,000$

Less additional processing costs -0- -0- -0- -0-

Net realizable value at split-off point 300,000$ 450,000$ 15,000$ a

765,000$

Allocated joint costs (108,000) b

(162,000) c

-0- (270,000)

Gross margin 192,000$ 288,000$ 15,000$ 495,000$

Gross margin as a percent of sales 64% 64% 100% 65%

Carlyle Coal Company By-Product

a Value of by-product reported as other income

b $300,000/$750,000 or 40% x $270,000

c $450,000/$750,000 or 60% x $270,000

Service Department Cost Allocation

Practice Problems

Joint Cost Allocation

Service Department Cost Allocation, Continued. . .

Carlyle Coal Company (CCC)

Service Department:

Information Systems (S1)

Service and User Departments of

Service Department:

Administration (S2)

User Department:

Hilltop Mine (P1)

User Department:

Pacific Mine (P2)

Recap of what we covered last class

Service Department Cost Allocation, Continued. . .

Information Systems (S1) Total S1 Costs $800,000

Allocation Base: Computer Hours

User Department Number of Hours Used Percent of Total

Administration (S2) 100,000 50%

Hilltop Mine (P1) 20,000 10%

Pacific Mine (P2) 80,000 40%

Totals 200,000 100%

Recap of what we covered last class

Administration (S2) Total S2 Costs $5,000,000

Allocation Base: Employees

User Department Employees Percent of Total

Information Systems (S1) 2,000 20%

Hilltop Mine (P1) 5,000 50%

Pacific Mine (P2) 3,000 30%

Totals 10,000 100%

Service Department Allocation Method:

1. Direct method.

2. Step method.

3. Reciprocal method.

Recap of what we covered last class

Information Systems (S1) Allocation Base: Computer Hours

User Department Number of Hours Used

Administration (S2) 100,000 Hilltop Mine (P1) 20,000

Pacific Mine (P2) 80,000

Totals 100,000

Number of Hours Used Percent of Total

50%

10% 20%

40% 80%

100%

Recap of what we covered last class

Allocation Base: Employees User Department Employees

Information Systems (S1) 2000 Hilltop Mine (P1) 5,000

Pacific Mine (P2) 3,000

Totals 8,000

Employees Percent of Total

20%

50% 62.5%

30% 37.5%

100%

Administration (S2)

Cost Allocation: Direct Method

Service Department Cost Allocation

Service Department Direct Cost P1 P2 Total

S1 800,000$ 20.0% a

80.0% 100.0%

S2 5,000,000 62.5% b

37.5% 100.0%

Percent Allocable to

S1 800,000$ 160,000$ c

640,000$ 800,000$

S2 5,000,000 3,125,000 d

1,875,000 5,000,000

Total allocated 5,800,000$ 3,285,000$ 2,515,000$ 5,800,000$

Recap of what we covered last class

Cost Allocation: Step Method

Service Department Direct Cost S1 S2 P1 P2 Total

S1 800,000$ 0% 50% a

10.0% b

40.0% c

100.0%

S2 5,000,000 0% 0% 62.5% d

37.5% e

100.0%

Percent Allocable to

From S1 S2 P1 P2 Total

800,000$ 5,000,000$ 5,800,000$ k

S1 (800,000) 400,000 f

80,000 g

320,000 h

-0-

S2 -0- (5,400,000) 3,375,000 i

2,025,000 j

-0-

Total $ -0- $ -0- 3,455,000$ 2,345,000$ 5,800,000$ k

To

Recap of what we covered last class

28

Practice Problem 1: Cost Allocation: Direct Method

0.625 0.375

0.5

29

Practice Problem 2: Allocating service department costs first to Production Departments and Then Jobs

Refer to Practice problem 1

30

Practice Problem 2: Allocating service department costs first to Production Departments and Then Jobs

$149,596

$210,404

31

Practice Problem 3: Cost Allocation: Step Method

Refer to Practice problem 1

32

Practice Problem 3: Cost Allocation: Reciprocal Method

Refer to Practice problem 1

Total Service

Department

Direct cost of the

service department

Cost allocated from other

service departments = +

33

Practice Problem 3: Cost Allocation: Reciprocal Method

Refer to Practice problem 1

34

Practice Problem 4: Joint Costs: NRV Method

35

Practice Problem 5: Joint Costs: NRV Method

36

Practice Problem 6: Joint Costs: Estimated NRV Method

Diagram the processing cost flows

37

Practice Problem 6: Joint Costs: Estimated NRV Method

38

Practice Problem 7:

Joint Costs: NRV Method to Solve for Unknowns

By-products

By-products are outputs of joint production

processes that are relatively minor in quantity

or value.

The net realizable value from sale of the

by-product is deducted from the joint

costs before allocation to the main

products.

The proceeds from sale of

the by-product are treated

as other revenue.

Method 1 Method 2

40

Practice Problem 8:

Joint Costs: NRV Method with By-Product

Total joint costs = 351,000

Total sales value at split-off for main products = 675,000

41

Total joint costs = 351,000

Total sales value at split-off for main products = 675,000

= 195,000

Practice Problem 8:

Joint Costs: NRV Method with By-Product

42

Practice Problem 9: Joint Cost: Physical Quantities Method

Given

Amount Allocated

from joint cost

43

Practice Problem 9: Joint Cost: Physical Quantities Method

Given

Amount Allocated

from joint cost

44

Practice Problem 10:

Joint Cost: Physical Quantities Method with By-Product

The net processing costs to be allocated = 270,000 – 10,000 = 260,000