Accounting Systems
Accounting Systems 204 - Assignment Marking Rubric
Standards
|
Criteria |
Very Poor Effort |
Poor Effort |
Reasonable Effort |
Exceeds Expectations |
Excellent Work
|
|
Identification of inherent risks |
Did not sufficiently identify basic key risks applicable to achieving simple business goals (2). |
Identified some basic key risks applicable to achieving simple business goals (4).
|
Identified significant key risks applicable to simple business goals (6). |
Identified some significant key risks applicable to complex business goals with interrelationships (8). |
Identified most significant key risks applicable to complex business goals (10). |
|
Relevant business cycles |
Did not sufficiently identify relevant business cycles and/or relationships (1). |
Identified some relevant business cycles but their relationships are inappropriate (2). |
Identified some relevant business cycles and their relationships are appropriate (3). |
Identified most business cycles but not all their relationships are appropriate (4). |
Identified most business cycles and their relationships are appropriate (5). |
|
Revenue cycle documentation |
Did not sufficiently document the business cycle (4). |
Sufficiently documented the business cycle but lacks many important components (8). |
Sufficiently documented the business cycle but lacks some important components (12). |
Completely documented the business cycle (16). |
Completely documented an efficient business cycle (20). |
|
Database, files and fields |
Did not use any RDBMS software, DB normalized, primary & foreign keys identified, tables properly related and important fields identified (4). |
Used RDBMS software, not normalized database. Fields and primary & foreign keys insufficiently identified. Tables are not properly related (12).
|
Used RDBMS software, database normalized, important fields identified but not all primary & foreign keys identified (24).
|
Used RDBMS software, database normalized, all primary & foreign keys identified and tables properly related but NOT all important fields identified (32). |
Used RDBMS software, database normalized, all primary & foreign keys identified, tables properly related and all important fields identified (40). |
|
Screens and reports |
Less than three relevant screens and reports designed (1). |
Some of the three screens and reports designed are irrelevant (2).
|
Three relevant screens and reports designed but not all fields are identified (3). |
Three relevant screens and reports designed and all fields are identified (4). |
Three screens and reports are relevant and properly formatted. All fields are identified (5). |
|
Risk
|
The controls identified are unclear and/or irrelevant.
Assumptions/limitations are not described (3). |
The controls identified are clear and relevant.
Few assumptions/limitations are described (6). |
The controls identified are clear and relevant.
Several assumptions/limitations are described (9). |
The controls identified are relevant, significant and organised.
Assumptions/limitations are comprehensively described (12). |
The controls identified are comprehensive, relevant, significant and organised.
Assumptions/limitations are comprehensively described (15). |
|
Written communication skills |
Language used does not convey meaning to readers with clarity and includes numerous errors (1). |
Used language sufficiently well to convey basic meaning although errors reduce effectiveness of communication (2). |
Used language that generally conveys meaning to readers with clarity although writing may include some errors (3). |
Used language that conveys meaning to readers with clarity. Any errors which occur do not reduce communication effectiveness (4). |
Uses language that skilfully and effectively communicates meaning to readers with clarity and fluency, and is virtually error-free (5). |