FOR KIZANGILA

profileputit_
topic_5_participative_leadership.pptx

BUSM 4177 / 4194 Leading for Change

Topic 5: Participative Leadership

Sometimes called “empowering leadership”

Learning Objectives

Participative Leadership:

Understand different forms of participative leadership and empowerment.

Understand the major findings in research on consequences of participative leadership.

Understand the situations in which participative leadership is most likely to be effective.

Understand procedures for the effective use of consultation.

Understand the potential benefits and risks of delegation.

Understand when and how to use delegation effectively.

110

Types of Participative Leadership (a continuum of decision making involvement)

111

Unilateral – makes decision by oneself

3

AUTOCRATIC

Weak (or no) input by other people

Leader decides unilaterally

CONSULTATIVE

Leader seeks opinions of others

JOINT DECISION

Leader asks others to help make decisions

DELEGATION

Strong input by other people

Shares information

Collaborative approach to decisions

Leader is “hands-off” leaving others to self-direct

The “causal model” of participative leadership: Overview

Yukl suggests that there are three factors that determine just how beneficial participative leadership can be.

(see section in textbook for fuller description)

112

Potential benefits of the consultative approach

113

Decision quality

Decision acceptance

Satisfaction with decision process

Development of participant skills

Potential benefits of the consultative approach

113

Benefit 1: Decision quality

“Involving other people in making a decision is likely to increase the quality of a decision when participants have information and knowledge lacked by the leader and are willing to cooperate in finding a good solution”

Yukl (p113)

Cultural difference, eg vietnamese tend to eat very early. Bringing them out for a late dinner ruins their whole night schedule

6

Potential benefits of the consultative approach

113

Benefit 2 : Decision acceptance

“People who have considerable influence in making a decision tend to identify with it and perceive it to be their decision. This feeling of ownership increase their motivation to implement it successfully”

Yukl (p113)

Potential benefits of the consultative approach

113

Benefit 3 : Satisfaction with decision process

“Research on “procedural justice” found that the opportunity to express opinions and preferences before a decision is made (called voice) can have beneficial effects regardless of the actual influence participants have over the final decision (called choice)”

Yukl (p113)

Potential benefits of the consultative approach

114

Benefit 4 : Development of participant skills

“…helping to make a complex decision can result in more skills and confidence by participants….

…involvement in diagnosing the problem, generating solutions and planning implementation builds skills…

…may require considerable coaching and encouragement from leader..”

Yukl (p114)

Research evidence on participative leadership claims: Can we show that it really does result in better outcomes?

Research approach Researchers Does research show participative leadership to be more effective?
Field research Examine real situations in organisations Coch & French (1948) Latham & Yukl (1975) yes
Survey studies Questionnaires to leaders and followers Kim & Yukl (1995) yes
Lit reviews and Meta-analyses Summarise all research papers Combine data from many studies Cotton et al (1988) Leana et al (1990) Mixed outcomes
“Laboratory” experiments Set up experiment where leaders vary participative leadership Bragg & Andrews (1973) no

115

Research evidence on participative leadership claims: 2

116

“Overall, the results from research on the effects of participative leadership are not sufficiently strong and consistent to draw any firm conclusions

Sometimes it results in higher satisfaction, effort and performance… at other times it does not!”

Yukl (p 116)

What additional factor(s) might help explain the difference in the outcome?

Depends on cultural, readiness of people to accept participative leadership. Sometimes people are unwilling to decide, uncertainty avoidance.

11

Situational variables may explain differences in outcomes seen

116

Does the participative leadership approach only work when the “situation” or environment is right?

This idea is the basis of contingency theories which we’ll cover more fully in a separate topic.. We touch on it lightly here

Victor Vroom & Philip Yetton 1973

Model that helps you decide how “participative” to be when making decisions – hence called “decision model

Normative Decision model

116

Decision Procedures in Normative Decision Model

Autocratic decision

Consultative decision

Group decision

118

Normative Decision model

– Autocratic, consultative and group decision approaches

Vroom & Yetton’s Normative Decision model

– Summary or “contingency table” to determine approach

119

Contingent in this case refers to dependent on

15

Moving beyond consultation: Joint decision making

120

Moving beyond consultation: Joint decision making

120

Deciding whether to deeply involve staff

in a decision depends on:

How important the decision is

Whether staff have the relevant knowledge or expertise

Whether staff are likely to cooperate

Whether staff would accept a decision made solely by the leader (autocratic)

Whether it is feasible to get staff together to make a joint decision

Moving beyond consultation: Joint decision making

120

Encouraging staff to participate:

Ensure that staff have confidence / comfort to express concerns

Describe a proposal as “tentative”

Record staff ideas and suggestions

Look for ways to build on these ideas and suggestions

Be tactful in your feedback on suggestions

Listen to opposing views without getting defensive

Show appreciation for suggestions

Delegation as the ultimate decision-making approach

Version Woodruff 2014 SIM

19

RMIT University©

School of Management

20

Delegation

Delegation (or passing down) is the partnership of authority and not responsibility to another person (normally from a manager to a subordinate) to carry out specific activities. It is one of the core concepts of  leadership.

Wikipedia

Different forms and degrees of power sharing with individual staff.

Your textbook

“Major aspects of delegation include the variety and magnitude of responsibilities, the amount of discretion or range of choice allowed.. authority to take action and implement decisions without prior approval…”

Your textbook

Defining delegation

X

entrust (a task or responsibility) to another person, typically one who is less senior than oneself

Oxford English Dictionary

When you delegate, make sure people understand. When you delegate, you have to support. Provide the mentor, skills etc

20

Benefits of Delegation

Decision quality improvement

Subordinate implementation commitment

Enriched job

Time management

Management development

124

Downside of Delegation

Power sharing

Mistakes

Competition

Personal achievement

Subordinate characteristics

Distrust

Leader authority

127

What should we delegate?

Tasks that can be done better by a subordinate

Urgent but not high priority

Relevant to a subordinate’s career

Appropriate difficulty

Both pleasant and unpleasant tasks

Tasks not central to the manager’s role

128

How should we delegate?

Specify responsibilities

Provide adequate authority limits

Specify reporting requirements

Ensure subordinate acceptance of responsibilities

Inform others who need to know

Monitor progress

Arrange for delegate to receive necessary information

Provide support ands assistance

Make “mistakes” a learning rather than a punishing experience

129

24

Images included in this presentation are licenced under creative commons. Learn more about the creative commons scheme here.

RMIT is proud to partner with Pearson Australia in the development of the customised resources for this course.

This presentation draws on material from chapter five of the course textbook Sustainable Leadership people, technology and design – an RMIT Custom Publication, Pearson ® Australia and is subject to copyright.

Presentation developed by Ian Woodruff, School of Management,

RMIT University

Graphics used in this presentation were created using Presenter M edia Software licenced to Ian Woodruff, RMIT University.

Presenter Media retains copyright for these graphics.

Acknowledgements

VERSION: 1