3-4 Pages- Case Study Org. Leadership
taurus77
case_study_analysis_guidelines_and_rubric_final-1.docx
Case Study Analysis Guidelines and Rubric
Overview
Milestone One: Begin Work
In Task 2-3, you will read the HBR Coursepack case “Anne Mulcahy: Leading Xerox Through the Perfect Storm” found in Module Two Resources. No deliverable is due this module.
You will begin to prepare a case study analysis that examines the following topics:
· In what way did Mulcahy’s upbringing (Exhibit 3) and Xerox experience serve to shape her EQ and authentic leadership?
· How effectively did Mulcahy apply EQ and authentic leadership when she became COO? Explain your reasoning.
· What is your assessment of Mulcahy as a leader?
Milestone Two: Draft
In Task 3-3, you will submit a rough draft of your case analysis. This will be submitted for feedback only, but it will count towards the milestone submission critical element.
Milestone Three: Submit Case Study
In Task 4-3, you will submit your final case study. This is graded with the Case Study Analysis Rubric.
Rubric
Requirements of submission: 3–4 pages, double spaced, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Refer to this link for viewing and printing Turnitin paper feedback.
Instructor Feedback : Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.
|
Critical Elements |
Distinguished |
Proficient |
Emerging |
Not Evident |
Value |
|
Inquiry and Analysis
|
Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of course concepts (23-25) |
Provides in-depth analysis that demonstrates complete understanding of some course concepts (20-22) |
Provides some analysis that demonstrates minimal understanding of course concepts (18-19) |
Does not provide analysis or does not demonstrate any understanding of course concepts (0-17) |
25 |
|
Milestone Submission and Incorporation of Feedback
|
Meets Emerging requirements and addresses all instructor feedback through incorporation or clarifying questions/dialogue with instructor (9-10) |
Meets Emerging requirements and incorporates some of the instructor’s feedback throughout the progression of the project (8) |
Student completes and submits all milestones by the due date
(7) |
Student submits incomplete milestones or does not submit by the due date
(0-6) |
10 |
|
Critical Thinking |
Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples (32-35) |
Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence
(28-31) |
Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence
(25-27) |
Does not draw logical conclusions
(0-24) |
35 |
|
Research |
Incorporates multiple scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research (14-15) |
Incorporates some scholarly resources effectively that reflect depth and breadth of research (12-13) |
Incorporates very few scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research
(11) |
Does not incorporate scholarly resources that reflect depth and breadth of research
(0-10) |
15 |
|
Writing (Mechanics/Citations) |
No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (14-15) |
Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (12-13) |
Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (11) |
Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations (0-10) |
15 |
|
Earned Total Comments: |
100% |
