aakashagarwal

Objective/Criteria

Performance Indicators

Need Improvement

Meet Expectations

Exceptional

Content

(1 points) Vague summary of major points, poor grasp of major constructs and inadequate handling of research data. Inadequate development of topic, little substance, few or unsuitable reviewed examples or data. Instructional material reflects major weaknesses in terms of best practices. Mostly unfocused discussion. Lacks cohesion. It has few or no relevant additional sources to elaborate on topic.

(2 points) Adequate summary of major points, research question or hypotheses, Review of topic falls within task parameters, mostly relevant comments and observations. Fairly articulate in review of major constructs and pertinent data. Instructional application provides some support evidence showing good grasp of best practices allowing for clarification & personalized content that promotes participation. It shows some additional elaboration based on external sources.

(3 points) Major points clearly stated, substantive development of content, relevant to assigned topic. Thoughtfully planned discussion of strength/ weaknesses, supported by evidence in the form of examples, cited sources, and collected data. Instructional application is organized, clear, informed, shows reflection & encourages participation. Choice of activities/ applications reflects best practices. Content goes beyond text integrating data from additional sources to enrich presentation.

Organization

(1 points) Organization has minor flaws and is somewhat easy to navigate. Few of the relevant standards are evident and reflections are not clearly labeled. Application is somewhat unclear or needs detail.

(2 points) Organization is generally clear, understandable & mostly easy to navigate. Most standards & objectives are covered. Evidence & most reflections are labeled. Application seems sound/ suitable for diverse students. There is some additional supporting material from added sources.

(3 points) Organization is consistently clear and easy to navigate. Discussion reflects professional standards & objectives suitable for diverse learners. Support and reflections are labeled. Application is pertinent. There is significant additional supporting material from added sources.

Conventions

(1 points) Limited mastery of pertinent medium, frequent errors in usage, relevance confused or obscured, Support may be partial and or overly general. Some of the activities may not be appropriate or related to the topic or lesson. Unable to engage audience. Weak use of suitable technology. Suggests lack of or limited planning/ preparation.

(2 points) Occasional misuse of terminology, reasonable adherence to media style conventions. Generally describes and includes some specific and appropriate support to justify conclusions; conforms to accepted formats for engaging audience. Balanced use of suitable technology.

(3 points) Conforms to established style conventions for use of electronic media. Vocabulary range is sophisticated, shows sound grasp of participatory activities, able to provide suitable practical applications relevant to diverse learners & use of technology that is student friendly. All required task components are fully addressed.

Timeliness

(0 points) Presentation not submitted by required date (more than a day late).

(0.5 points) Presentation submitted late (less than a day) due to mitigating circumstances.

(1 points) Presentation submitted by due date as required.

Total: 10 out of 10