online summer class
“Kindness in words creates confidence;
Kindness in thinking creates profoundness;
Kindness in giving creates love.”
-- Lao Tzu
CIMT 689
Learning Theory & Instructional
Strategies
CIMT Department Diversity Statement:
The faculty and staff of the Department of Curriculum, Instruction, and Media
Technology believe in the value of recognizing the contributions of individual and group
differences in areas such as ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, culture, and
personal experience. In doing so, we recognize and affirm that promoting human
diversity in teaching, learning, and daily life enhances the effectiveness of our work and
that of our students.
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 2 of 11
Summer, 2014
The overarching theme of Indiana State University's educator preparation programs is
Becoming a Complete Professional. This theme encompasses three broad areas that
recognize essential areas of the work of an educator:
Educator as Expert or Mediator of Learning,
Educator as Person, and
Educator as Member of Communities.
The word complete in the title acknowledges that, to be truly successful, an educator must
be effective in all three of these areas. Similarly, the word becoming is included in the
title because new graduates, alumni, and our faculty are never fully finished with their
learning in their profession as a teacher, counselor, school psychologist, speech language
pathologist, principal, or superintendent.
The component Educator as Expert or Mediator of Learning deals with an educator’s
professional skill as a mediator of students’ learning and/or of the progress individuals
make in achieving their potential. The component Educator as Person represents the
traits and dispositions that make a successful educator justifiably respected and emulated
by students while meeting the expectations of professional, state, and institutional
standards. The component Educator as Member of Communities reflects the necessity of
contributing to the various communities of which educators, as professionals, are
members. A truly successful educator must concurrently exhibit the traits of mediator of
learning, person, and member of communities while incorporating the latest knowledge
and technologies and demonstrating multicultural competence and sensitivity to diversity.
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 3 of 11
Summer, 2014
GENERAL INFORMATION
Course instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Professor
Curriculum, Instruction, & Media Technology
Bayh College of Education
Instructor’s office: UH 323C
Instructor’s office hours: Online daily weekdays
Instructor’s e-mail address: [email protected]
Course hours: 3 credit hours
Class format: Online
Required Textbook: Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for
instruction. Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn and
Bacon.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Learning and instruction. Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Foshay, W.R., Silber, K. H., & Stelnicki, M. B.
(2003). Writing training materials that work. San
Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfieffer.
COURSE INFORMATION
Course Description 3 hours. This course is designed to help you learn how theories of
human learning and motivation can be applied to the instructional
process in order to make the process more effective, efficient, and
appealing. The focus of the course throughout the semester will be
on three areas: 1) the theoretical principles that have contributed to
the field of Instructional Design (ID), 2) application of those
principles within practically educational and training settings, and
3) specific instructional strategies, techniques, and approaches that
can be used to impact learning effectiveness, efficiency, and
appeal. Reading and studying the assigned chapters in the texts
will acquaint you with the key theories. The discussions, writing
assignments, and projects will help you reflect on your reading and
apply the derived principles into practice.
Instructional Goals Upon the completion of this course, you will be able to:
1. Identify and describe the basic tenets of behavioral, cognitive, and constructivist learning theories (AECT Standard 5).
2. Compare and contrast the contributions of various learning theories to the field of instructional design (AECT Standard 5).
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 4 of 11
Summer, 2014
3. Identify and describe the basic components within various motivational theories and their impact upon the learning process
(AECT Standard 5).
4. Select appropriate principles derived from given theories and apply those within practical learning situations (AECT Standards 1 & 5).
5. Identify, synthesize, and summarize practical, research based guidelines that facilitate the development of quality instructional
results (AECT Standards 1 & 5).
6. Identify, describe, and select relevant cognitive techniques (e.g., chunking, frames, concept maps, advance organizers, metaphors,
imagery and mnemonics) and cite relevant research to indicate
their appropriate use and effectiveness (AECT Standards 1 & 5).
7. Identify, describe, and select relevant instructional approaches (e.g., case-based instruction, cooperative learning, discussion,
simulation, peer mentoring, reciprocal teaching, and discovery)
and cite relevant research to indicate their appropriate use and
effectiveness (AECT Standards 1 & 5).
8. Given a task to design instructional materials for specific content, identify the type of learning involved, select the appropriate set of
instructional techniques, approaches and strategies, take diversity
issues into consideration, and utilize those to design and develop
an effective instructional outcome (AECT Standards 1 through 5).
Course philosophy There are several things you should keep in mind as you begin this
course. First, I don't believe you can learn everything there is to
know from this course. You could spend years studying learning
and motivation. But I want you to learn some of the major
principles from these theories and how you can use the principles
as a foundation for decisions you make as an instructional designer
(do not tell me that you are not going to be an instructional
designer. No matter in which educational or training setting you
will be, you will need to design instruction).
Second, active participation is a must. This doesn't mean that you
need to dominate every discussion. But it does mean that you
should take an active part in the discussions. Think of the course as
an ongoing discussion about learning and motivation that will take
different directions each session. Try to synthesize the collected
wisdom from the class in a way that makes sense to you.
Contribute those ideas and the rest of us will add our thoughts.
Third, take time to think reflectively about the readings and
discussions. You all have a lot of experience as learners (and
maybe as teachers or trainers) that you can use to help you make
sense of what you read in the texts. In fact, I will often specifically
ask you to think back over your experiences as a learner as you
consider some ideas from the text. So, take time to go beyond just
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 5 of 11
Summer, 2014
reading the texts. Explore, discover, and look for connections that
are important to you.
Finally, attend this class with an open mind. Don't come in with a
preset notion for or against a specific theory. Instructional
designers don't have the luxury of ignoring potentially helpful
principles that may come from a wide variety of sources. For
example, even though you may believe that behaviorism is an
obsolete theory with little to offer current practitioners, keep an
open mind. You may just be surprised.
Logistics Online Interaction Expectations
This is a 100% online class and you will have all discussions
online. Online interaction is a fundamental component of this
class, both in terms of the professor interacting with students, and
students interacting with one another. You are required to spend at
least 3 hours on each discussion topic. I will monitor closely all of
the comments that are being made. I will record the quantity and
quality of your responses.
Our online discussion will rely on the assigned readings to provide
the course content. The online discussion is a place to challenge,
synthesize, apply, and evaluate the material in the texts and course
readings as well as the experiences, positions, and conceptions of
each other. Mutual respect and supportive dialogue are essential to
this process. How will we do it? Please read the following section.
Peer Critique and Discussion
Feedback is critical to the learning process (both giving and
receiving it), so we are asking you to post your assignments online
during the designated date in order that your classmates will be
able to read and respond to them. These should be considered your
final version when posted. You do not need to send a separate
submission for me to grade. You should review and comment on
the assignments of two or three classmates’ during this time, as
well as respond to questions about your work. The rules for whose
work to review will be specified online. The following table
provides you with a general procedure for each assignment of
reading and discussion as an overall picture:
Timeline Task For what?
During the week* Completing the assignment
and Q & A
Course content learning and
collaboration
Reading reflection
posting Tuesday
Post your reading
reflection Turning in your assignment
Critique Thursday* Thoroughly critique two
(or three) peers’ postings
Thorough understanding of the
readings
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 6 of 11
Summer, 2014
Debate Friday* Respond to all peer
critiques and debate
Thorough understanding of the
readings
* Note: While discussing on the previous assignment, read the chapters for the
following assignment and discussion.
Assignments Guidelines The assignments are designed to meet our instructional goals.
There are ten reflection assignments on readings, one term paper,
and one major project: designing a training manual. Reflections
and the term paper are designed to meet instructional goals 1
through 7. The final project is a comprehensive project that
provides you with an opportunity to enhance and transfer your
knowledge to meet instructional goal 8 of this course.
Reflection on reading (100 points)
There are 10 reflections on readings, focusing on Driscoll (2005)
and Mayer (2008). The purpose of this assignment is to ensure
your maximal understanding of the texts. You are required to read
the assigned chapters thoroughly and think deeply. Your reflection
paper has to be a thorough discussion to demonstrate your
understanding of the reading. All students’ reflections will be
posted online and you are encouraged and welcome to read
everyone’s reflection although you are only required to do two (or
three accordingly) peer critiques. Do not think it is wasting your
time to read others’ reflections. Believe it or not, on the contrary, it
will help you save your time because others’ reflections will help
you improve your thinking skills and/or your reflection quality.
Please note: For each discussion, you are assigned to read two
chapters, one from each book. Driscoll’s is very theoretical and
Mayer’s is theory with/into practice. The sequence of the reading
follows the content outline of the books, so the Driscoll’s chapter
is not necessary parallel with the Mayer’s chapter in the same
assignment. Write your reflection using two separate sections, one
for Dristcoll and the other for Mayer.
Term Paper (50 points)
Looking at the points assigned, you should realize how much this
paper is weighed and how much you are required for this paper.
Your term paper will consist of an explorative literature review and
theoretical framework that examines a topic of interest paired with
at least one of the learning theories in this course. For example,
you might choose a broad topic, such as “Application of Learning
Theories in Museum Education.” Alternatively, you might choose
a narrow topic, such as “Learning Theories Supporting
Asynchronous Computer-Mediated Discussion.” You may also
choose one learning theory, such as “Student Motivation in
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 7 of 11
Summer, 2014
Problem-Based Learning.” Having completed reading of Driscoll
and Mayer, definitely, you will be able to write this paper of a high
quality. Do not wait until the last minute for the topic for your
paper. Wise students always plan ahead. You should have
already had a marvelous idea about your paper topic during the
chapter reading and discussion. Feel free to talk with me about
your topic via e-mail. I am available to discuss potential paper
topics with you.
Details: Papers should be written in the APA format and be kept
within 10-15 pages (references excluded). You may collaborate
with a peer or write the paper individually. A variety of references
is expected and the vast majority should come from peer-reviewed
journals.
Note 1: Your paper will be graded based on what you have
decided to discuss and the contribution you are attempting to make
through your discussion. In other words, seek to move beyond
summarization toward a synthesis of ideas that leads to
something new.
Note 2: Something that is always important to remember is that
instructional designers are a practical bunch – we will always look
for applications. How can the concepts and ideas that you are
presenting be used by the instructional designer? Make sure to
include a section that involves applications.
Training manual project (100 points)
Over the last two weeks, the focus of the course will be on the
implementation and use of the cognitive training model to create
an instructional package. This package will consist of a training
manual for instructional designers on how to identify, select, use,
and design instructional strategies (e.g., analogies). Please make
sure that you understand: The target learners of your
instructional package are instructional designers and the
content area is on instructional strategies not phases of
instructional design. If your project does not meet the
requirements highlighted, no matter how good your writing is, the
grade you get will be a zero. The requirement for this project is
very specific. If you have a problem understanding the
requirement, please talk to me as early as possible.
Obviously, this is an even bigger thing!! Combining Driscoll
(2005) and Mayer (2008) with Foshay, et al. (2003) will help you
complete this project. Please note: we do not discuss Foshay as we
do Driscoll and Mayer. It does not mean that Foshay is not of the
same importance. As a matter of fact, Foshay will help you more
directly with your training manual project. However, without
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 8 of 11
Summer, 2014
Driscoll and/or Mayer, you will hardly be able to design
instruction that is truly effective, efficient, and appealing.
Again, start your “thinking” early. A top student in my previous
class said: “This is a lot harder than I thought it would be, and
I wish I would have started it mid-semester, so I could have
flexed it and shaped it much better than time allows me now.
Foshay offers great tips and structural ideas.” I hope this
quotation can be used as a “warning” for you to start this project as
early as you can.
Requirements: Develop chapters within the manual that describe:
What it is (description of the strategy/approach),
When to select and use it (conditions of use),
Why it should be selected (research on effectiveness of the strategy),
How it is best utilized,
How to design the strategy, and
Related research and references
Make sure that you understand you do need to include learning
objectives and assessment items in each chapter. Your learning
objectives need to reach the highest level of design and your
assessment need to test all the learning objectives appropriately.
You also need to design instructional strategies for your
instruction. Make sure that you “study” the rubric that will be used
to grade your training manual so you will not miss anything that
should be reflected in your writing in order to receive points for all
the required criteria.
In order to help you better, there are four stages for the project:
1. Plan and report 2. Outline 3. Project due 4. Possible revision
Please refer to the tentative schedule for the deadline for each
stage. Please note: Stage Three is your project due and you will get
a grade at this stage. Do make sure that you will do a “perfect” job
when you submit your project at Stage Three. I may or may not
provide you with an opportunity of revision, so Stage Four may or
may not apply to everyone accordingly.
The paper and the project will be submitted through
SafeAssignment on the Blackboard course site. SafeAssignment is
a program that checks originality of the project/paper. All
submissions through SafeAssignment are saved on the ISU
database. A project that is found not original will automatically get
an F (please also refer to Code of Student Conduct
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 9 of 11
Summer, 2014
http://www.indstate.edu/sci/docs/2012-StudentGuide-
AcademicIntegrity.pdf for details). I open a Self Check window for
you to check originality of your work before submitting it to me.
Make sure that you submit your original work written or designed
for this class.
Good luck with your project!!!
Online participation including on-time reading of reflection
postings, posting peer critique, and debate (130 points)
Active participation and regular attendance is a must in this course.
Your active participation in the activities means you have to be
present, prompt, and you must complete all readings and
assignments on time. No excuses will be accepted for late
participation considering all of us having an equally busy schedule.
You critique two peers’ reflections for each reading assignment,
thoroughly, as a minimal requirement. I want to repeat the word
THOROUGHLY. If you only say great and agree, you will not
receive any points. Nothing in the world is perfect. There must be
something in the reflection that needs improving. That is the
part where you need to discuss and debate with your peers. The
purpose of doing this is to enhance both your peers’ and your own
knowledge on the reading. You have to respond to your peers’
critique and their responses to your critique, so the discussion will
last. Please refer to the grading sheet section for the distribution of
the points for each activity.
GRADING SHEET
Assignment Title Your score Total possible
Posting
1 ~ 10 Reflection on reading 10 * 10
11 Term paper 50
12 Training manual project 100
Sub Total 250
Discussion Peer Critique & Debate Your score Total possible
1 ~ 10 Reflection on reading (3*2+2*2)*10
11 Term paper 3*2+2*2
12 Training manual project 3*2+2*2
Participation: You need to be very active (do
more that the minimal requirements) with
discussion and attend all the class meetings in
order to get the 10 points.
10
Sub Total 130
Grand Total: 380
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 10 of 11
Summer, 2014
Course Grade A+ A A- B+ B
Criteria 99-100% 94-99% 90-94% 88-90% 84-88%
Course Grade B- C+ C C- F
Criteria 80-84% 77-80% 74-77% 70-74% < 70%
TENTATIVE COURSE SCHEDULE
Please note: Due time is 11:59 PM EST (see the dates specified in the following table).
No late submissions will be accepted. No revisions are provided. Do a “perfect” job
before your submission of assignments.
Week Assignments Assignments Due
Day
One
May 12
Read all the information on the course site and do Quiz 1
Post your Home page introducing yourself online
Thoroughly understand course requirements
Week 1
May 12
- 16
Reflection on Reading 1: Introduction to Learning & Instruction
o Driscoll, Chapter 1 o Mayer, Chapter 1
Reflection on Reading 2: o Driscoll, Chapter 2 Radical Behaviorism o Mayer, Chapters 2 through 6 (choose one
that is your area/interest)
Report and Plan due:
May 14
Week 2
May 19
- 23
Reflection on Reading 3: o Driscoll, Chapter 3 Cognitive Information
Processing
o Mayer, Chapter 7 Teaching by giving productive feedback
Reflection on Reading 4: o Driscoll, Chapter 4 Meaningful Learning &
Schema Theory
o Mayer, Chapter 8 teaching by providing concreteness, activity, and familiarity
Reflections 1 & 2
Posting: May 20
Peer critique: May 22
Debate: May 23
Term paper topic due:
May 23
Week 3
May 27
- 30
Reflection on Reading 5: o Driscoll, Chapter 5 Situated Cognition o Mayer, Chapter 9 teaching by explaining
examples
Reflection on Reading 6: o Driscoll, Chapter 6 Cognitive &
Knowledge Development
o Mayer, Chapter 10 Teaching by guiding cognitive
Reflections 3 & 4
Posting: May 27
Peer critique: May 29
Debate: May 30 May 26: Memorial Day
Training Manual
outline due: May 30
CIMT 689: Learning Theory & Instructional Strategies Instructor: Feng-Qi Lai, Ph.D.
Syllabus Page 11 of 11
Summer, 2014
Week Assignments Assignments Due
Week 4
Jun 2-6 Reflection on Reading 7:
o Driscoll, Chapter 7 Interactional Theories of Cognitive Development
o Mayer, Chapter 11 Teaching by fostering learning strategies
Reflection on Reading 8: o Driscoll, Chapter 8 Biological Bases of
Learning & Memory
o Mayer, Chapter 12 Teaching by fostering problem-solving strategies
Reflections 5 & 6
Posting: Jun 3
Peer critique: Jun 5
Debate: Jun 6
Week 5
Jun 9-
13
Reflection on Reading 9: o Driscoll, Chapter 9 Motivation & Self-
Regulation in Learning
o Mayer, Chapter 14 Teaching by priming students’ motivation to learn
Reflection on Reading 10: o Driscoll, Chapter 11 Constructivism o Mayer, Chapter 13 Teaching by creating
cognitive apprenticeship in classrooms
Reflections 7 & 8
Posting: Jun 10
Peer critique: Jun 12
Debate: Jun 13
Week 6
Jun 16-
20
Term Paper Reflections 9 & 10
Posting: Jun 17
Peer critique: Jun 19
Debate: Jun 20 Training Manual due:
Jun 20
Week 7
Jun 23-
27
Training Manual Project: Use o Foshay et al., and o Knowledge that you have learned from this
class so far to help with the project
Term Paper
Posting: Jun 24
Peer critique: Jun 26
Debate: Jun 27
Submission through the Assignment box
Due: Jun 24
Week 8
June
30- July
3
Training Manual Project Training Manual Project
Posting: Jul 1
Peer critique: Jul 2
Debate: Jul 3 Revision Due: July 1
Jul 4: Independent Day