argument and demonstrate

I want you to connect the literature to an organizational problem (Absenteeism) as an argument in a tratraditional graduate seminar paper format with traditional journal quality/conference paper quality seminar paper. The teacher instruction: make some kind of argument and demonstrate that you have engaged with the literature. I want to see your voice and your ideas entering into conversation.  I am attaching the literatures from my class. You decide how many article you need to use from my class and if you need to use more articles from other sources you are free to do it. I need the paper between 6 and 9 pages APA style, I need the paper or first draft on April 9   Tompkins, P. K., & Wanca-Thibault, M. (2001). Organizational Communication: Prelude and Prospects. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. xvii-xxxi). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.   Deetz, S. (2001). Conceptual Foundations. In F. M. Jablin & L. L. Putnam (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: Advances in theory, research, and methods (pp. 3-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.   Jones, E., Watson, B., Gardner, J., & Gallois, C. (2004). Organizational communication: Challenges for the new century. Journal of Communication, 54(4), 722-750.   January 28th, Day 3: Institutions/Institutionalization/Professions   Lammers, J.C. & Garcia, M.A. (2013). Institutional Theory. In L.L Putnam and D. Mumby (Eds), The SAGE handbook of organizational communication (3rd ed., pp. 195-216). Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.   Lammers, J.C. & Garcia, M.A. (2009). Exploring the Concept of 'Profession' For Organizational Communication Research: Institutional Influences in a Veterinary Organization. Management Communication Quarterly, 22, 357-384   Cheney, G., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2007). Considering "the professional" in communication studies: Implications for theory and research within and beyond the boundaries of organizational communication. Communication Theory, 17, 146-175.   February 4th, Day 4:  Cheney, G., Lair, D. J., Ritz, D., & Kendall, B. E. (2010). Chapter 4: Being a Professional: Problems and Promises.Just a Job? Communication, ethics, and professional life (pp. 123-158). New York: Oxford University Press.   Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58-80.   February 11th, Day 5: Montgomery, K., & Oliver, A. L. (1996). Responses by professional organizations to multiple and ambiguous institutional environments: The case of AIDS. Organization Studies, 17, 649-671.   TBD: Leicht and Fennel Institutionalism and Professions OR Article on Fields   February 18th, Day 6: Identity/Identification   Ashforth, B.E. & Mael, F. (1989). Social Identity Theory and the Organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, pp. 20-39   Albert, S., Ashforth, B. E., & Dutton, J. E. (2000). Organizational identity and identification: Charting new waters and building new bridges. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 13-17.   February 25th, Day 7: Identity/Identification   Cheney, G. (1983). The rhetoric of identification and the study of organizational communication. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 69, 143-158.   Pratt, M. G. (1998). To be or not to be?: Central questions in organizational identification. In D. Whetten & P. Godfre (Eds.), Identity in Organizations: Building Theory Through Conversations (pp. 171-207). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.   March 4th, Day 8: Identity/Identification   Scott, C. R., Corman, S. R., & Cheney, G. (1998). Development of a structurational model of identification in the organization. Communication Theory, 6, 298-336.   Kuhn, T., & Nelson, N. (2002). Reengineering identity: A case study of the multiplicity and duality in organizational identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 16, 5-38.   March 18th, Day 9:  Identity/Identification Pratt, M. G. (2000). The good, the bad, the ambivalent: Managing identification among Amway distributors.Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 456-493.   Pratt, M. G., & Rafaeli, A. (1997). Organizational dress as a symbol of multilayered social identities. Academy of Management Journal, 40(4), 862-898.   March 25th, Day 10: Professional Identity Russo, T. C. (1998). Organizational and professional identification. Management Communication Quarterly, 12,72-111.   Ashcraft, K. L. (2005). Resistance through consent? : Occupational identity, organizational form, and the maintenance of masculinity among commercial airline pilots. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 67-90.   Real, K., & Putnam, L. L. (2005). Ironies in the discursive struggle of pilots defending the profession. Management Communication Quarterly, 19, 91-119.   April 1st, Day 11: Professional Identity   Barbour, J. B., & Lammers, J. C. (2007). Health care institutions, communication, physicians' experience of managed care: A multilevel analysis. Management Communication Quarterly, 21, 201-231.   Pratt, M. G., Rockmann, K. W., & Kaufmann, J. B. (2006). Constructing professional identity: The role of work and identity learning cycles in the customization of identity among medical residents. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 235-262.   April 8th, Day 12: Professional Identity   Apker, J., & Eggly, S. (2004). Communicating professional identity in medical socialization: Considering the ideological discourse of the morning report. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 411-429.   Miller, K. (1998). The evolution of professional identity: The case of osteopathic medicine. Social Science Medicine, 47(11), 1739-1748.   D'Cruz, P., & Noronha, E. (2006). Being professional: Organizational control in Indian call centers. Social Science Computer Review, 24(3), 342-361.