Query regarding
first model
| SUMMARY OUTPUT | ||||||||
| Regression Statistics | ||||||||
| Multiple R | 0.8777720835 | |||||||
| R Square | 0.7704838306 | |||||||
| Adjusted R Square | 0.7475322137 | |||||||
| Standard Error | 26969.8904973939 | |||||||
| Observations | 12 | |||||||
| ANOVA | ||||||||
| df | SS | MS | F | Significance F | ||||
| Regression | 1 | 24417916732.2525 | 24417916732.2525 | 33.5699150403 | 0.0001743872 | |||
| Residual | 10 | 7273749934.41419 | 727374993.441419 | |||||
| Total | 11 | 31691666666.6667 | ||||||
| Coefficients | Standard Error | t Stat | P-value | Lower 95% | Upper 95% | Lower 99.0% | Upper 99.0% | |
| Intercept | 173317.592738339 | 39186.0177573063 | 4.4229447813 | 0.0012881943 | 86005.7044932948 | 260629.480983383 | 49126.4175509161 | 297508.767925762 |
| X Variable 1 | 78.4196442626 | 13.5347346813 | 5.793955043 | 0.0001743872 | 48.2623761971 | 108.576912328 | 35.5243795195 | 121.3149090056 |
1
| Observation | MH | DLH | Total Overhead Costs | ||
| January | 5,600 | 2,000 | $ 320,000 | ||
| February | 7,000 | 2,500 | $ 340,000 | ||
| March | 8,000 | 4,000 | $ 470,000 | ||
| April | 8,400 | 3,300 | $ 440,000 | ||
| May | 6,400 | 2,250 | $ 300,000 | ||
| June | 8,000 | 2,600 | $ 390,000 | ||
| July | 6,800 | 3,000 | $ 420,000 | ||
| August | 8,000 | 2,500 | $ 400,000 | ||
| September | 6,500 | 3,250 | $ 430,000 | ||
| October | 6,000 | 2,300 | $ 400,000 | ||
| November | 9,600 | 3,600 | $ 460,000 | ||
| December | 6,000 | 2,750 | $ 380,000 | ||
| High MH | 9,600 | $ 460,000 | |||
| Low MH | 5,600 | $ 320,000 | |||
| a | OH Costs = a + b(MH) | ||||
| where, b | 35 | ||||
| a | $ 124,000 | ||||
| Thus, the equation is OH costs = $1,24,000 +35(MH) | |||||
| b | |||||
| i | The three regression models estimated are: | ||||
| 1. DLH and Overhead Cost | |||||
| 2. MH and Overhead Cost | |||||
| 3. MH and DLH | |||||
| ii | The third model (MH and DLH) is the best because it incorporates all the variables of the data. | ||||
| iii | Second model : MH and Overhead Cost | ||||
| Estimated Overhead Cost | $ 447,572.34 | ||||
| iv | First Model :DLH and Overhead Cost | ||||
| Lower interval | $ 86,005.70 | ||||
| Upper interval | $ 260,629.48 | ||||
| v | First Model :DLH and Overhead Cost | ||||
| Lower interval | $ 49,126.42 | ||||
| Upper interval | $ 297,508.77 | ||||
| NOTE : To view the detailed calculation click on the cell containing the figure |
2
| Cash Revenue (per year) | $ 330,000 | |||||||||
| Cash Expenses (per year) | $ 200,000 | |||||||||
| Cost of Equipment | $ 380,000 | |||||||||
| Salvage Value at the end of 7th year | $ 60,000 | |||||||||
| Tax rate | 40% | |||||||||
| Life | 8 | |||||||||
| Depreciation | Straight line method | |||||||||
| Cost of capital | 12% | |||||||||
| Year | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | ||
| Initial Investment | $ -380,000 | |||||||||
| Cash Revenue (net) | $ 130,000 | $ 130,000 | $ 130,000 | $ 130,000 | $ 130,000 | $ 130,000 | $ 130,000 | |||
| Depreciation | $ 40,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 40,000 | |||
| Net profit (before tax) | $ 90,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 90,000 | |||
| Tax | $ 36,000 | $ 36,000 | $ 36,000 | $ 36,000 | $ 36,000 | $ 36,000 | $ 36,000 | |||
| Net profit (after tax) | $ 54,000 | $ 54,000 | $ 54,000 | $ 54,000 | $ 54,000 | $ 54,000 | $ 54,000 | |||
| After tax cash Flow | $ -380,000 | $ 94,000 | $ 94,000 | $ 94,000 | $ 94,000 | $ 94,000 | $ 94,000 | $ 154,000 | ||
| Accumulative | $ -380,000 | $ -286,000 | $ -192,000 | $ -98,000 | $ -4,000 | $ 90,000 | $ 184,000 | $ 338,000 | ||
| a | After tax cash flow for the first year | $ 94,000 | ||||||||
| b | ARR on average investment for first year | 15.00% | ||||||||
| c | Payback period (years) | 4.04 | ||||||||
| d | NPV | $ 76,134.07 | ||||||||
| e | IRR | 17.75% | ||||||||
| NOTE : To view the detailed calculation click on the cell containing the figure |
3
| Cost of direct materials | $ 255,000 | ||||||
| Conversion cost | $ 158,000 | ||||||
| Beginning WIP Cost : | |||||||
| Materials | $ 145,000 | ||||||
| Conversion | $ 22,000 | ||||||
| Beginning WIP Inventory (units) | 15,000 | ||||||
| Units started(units) | 25,000 | ||||||
| Ending WIP Inventory(units) | 10,000 | ||||||
| Units completed and transferred | 30,000 | ||||||
| a | Equivalent Units For materials | 40,000 | |||||
| Equivalent Units For conversion costs | 36,000 | ||||||
| b | Total amount | $ 580,000 | |||||
| c | Cost per Equivalent Units For materials | $ 10.00 | |||||
| Cost per Equivalent Units For conversion costs | $ 5.00 | ||||||
| d | Ending WIP | $ 130,000 | |||||
| e | Units transferred out to finished goods | $ 450,000 | |||||
| f | General Journal | ||||||
| Date | Description | Debit | Credit | ||||
| Finished Goods | 450,000 | ||||||
| WIP | 450,000 | ||||||
| (Being transfer to finished goods) | |||||||
| g | Equivalent Units For materials | 25,000 | |||||
| Equivalent Units For conversion costs | 31,500 | ||||||
| NOTE : To view the detailed calculation click on the cell containing the figure |
4
| A | B | C | Total | ||||
| MH | 3,000 | 5,000 | 2,000 | 10,000 | |||
| DLH | 25,000 | 15,000 | 10,000 | 50,000 | |||
| Units produced | 5,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 | 8,000 | |||
| DM Costs | $ 50,000 | $ 28,000 | $ 30,000 | $ 108,000 | |||
| DL Costs | $ 220,000 | $ 95,000 | $ 62,000 | $ 377,000 | |||
| Manufacturing OH Costs | $ 270,000 | ||||||
| $ 755,000 | |||||||
| a | Predetermined Overhead Costs (per machine hours) | $ 27.00 | |||||
| b | A | B | C | ||||
| Units produced | 5,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 | ||||
| DM Costs | $ 50,000 | $ 28,000 | $ 30,000 | ||||
| DL Costs | $ 220,000 | $ 95,000 | $ 62,000 | ||||
| Manufacturing OH Costs | $ 81,000 | $ 135,000 | $ 54,000 | ||||
| Total Cost | $ 351,000 | $ 258,000 | $ 146,000 | ||||
| Unit cost | $ 70.20 | $ 129.00 | $ 146.00 | ||||
| c | Predetermined Overhead Costs (per direct labour hours) | $ 5.40 | |||||
| d | A | B | C | ||||
| Units produced | 5,000 | 2,000 | 1,000 | ||||
| DM Costs | $ 50,000 | $ 28,000 | $ 30,000 | ||||
| DL Costs | $ 220,000 | $ 95,000 | $ 62,000 | ||||
| Manufacturing OH Costs | $ 135,000 | $ 81,000 | $ 54,000 | ||||
| Total Cost | $ 405,000 | $ 204,000 | $ 146,000 | ||||
| Unit cost | $ 81.00 | $ 102.00 | $ 146.00 | ||||
| NOTE : To view the detailed calculation click on the cell containing the figure |
5
| Job A | Job B | Job C | Total | ||||
| WIP, June 1 | $ 40,000 | $ 60,000 | $ 50,000 | $ 150,000 | |||
| June production activity: | |||||||
| Materials requisition and used | $ 30,000 | $ 40,000 | $ 30,000 | $ 100,000 | |||
| Direct labour cost | $ 15,000 | $ 30,000 | $ 45,000 | $ 90,000 | |||
| Machine hours | 2,000 | 3,000 | 4,000 | 9,000 | |||
| Estimated Manufacturing OH | $ 300,000 | ||||||
| Estimated Machine hours | 20,000 | ||||||
| a | Predetermined Overhead rate (per machine hours) | $ 15.00 | |||||
| b | Job A | Job B | Job C | ||||
| Assigned manufacturing OH costs | $ 30,000 | $ 45,000 | $ 60,000 | ||||
| Total Costs | $ 75,000 | $ 115,000 | $ 135,000 | ||||
| c | General Journal | ||||||
| Date | Description | Debit | Credit | ||||
| WIP Inventory | 100,000 | ||||||
| Raw material | 100,000 | ||||||
| (Being the total amount of Materials requisition and used in June) | |||||||
| d | General Journal | ||||||
| Date | Description | Debit | Credit | ||||
| WIP Inventory | 135,000 | ||||||
| Manufacturing Overhead | 135,000 | ||||||
| (Being the total amount of overhead applied in June) | |||||||
| e | General Journal | ||||||
| Date | Description | Debit | Credit | ||||
| Finished Goods | 75,000 | ||||||
| WIP Inventory | 75,000 | ||||||
| (Being transfer completed Job A) | |||||||
| NOTE : To view the detailed calculation click on the cell containing the figure |
6
| WIP | $ 120,000 | ||||||
| Finished Goods | $ 180,000 | ||||||
| COGS | $ 300,000 | ||||||
| Factory Overhead Over Applied | $ 30,000 | ||||||
| Amount of factory overhead applied in 2013 | $ 250,000 | ||||||
| a | General Journal | ||||||
| Date | Description | Debit | Credit | ||||
| WIP Inventory | 250,000 | ||||||
| Factory Overhead | 250,000 | ||||||
| (Being the total amount of overhead applied at the end of 2013) | |||||||
| b | Actual Overhead for the year | $ 220,000 | |||||
| c | General Journal | ||||||
| Date | Description | Debit | Credit | ||||
| Factory Overhead | 30,000 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 30,000 | ||||||
| (Being transfer of over applied overhead) | |||||||
| d | General Journal | ||||||
| Date | Description | Debit | Credit | ||||
| Factory Overhead | 30,000 | ||||||
| Work in Progress | 6,000 | ||||||
| Finished Goods | 9,000 | ||||||
| Cost of goods sold | 15,000 | ||||||
| (Being factory overhead account balance disposed) | |||||||
| e | The second method of allocating Factory Overhead account balance among WIP, Finished Goods and Cost of goods sold is more accurate. This is because the factory overhead has been incurred in the manufacturing process which has been applied to work in progress inventory, finished goods and cost of good sold. Thus, the over/under applied factory overhead should be disposed among all the three heads, proportionately. | ||||||
| NOTE : To view the detailed calculation click on the cell containing the figure |