I need 8 pages for this

IP Subnet Design Project- ONLY QUALITY ASSIGNMENTS AND 0% PLAGIARISM

1 | P a g e

IP Subnet Design Project Overview Each student will create a detailed, unified technical design of network services given the scenario. The submission will be in a written format with a length of at least 1000 words (not counting diagrams, quoted passages, or other attachments) and with at least one detailed diagram created by the student. The assignment is meant for students to enhance their mastery of the material and to provide a creative and realistic way in which to apply knowledge from this course. Scenario You are a consultant being brought in by XUMUC to assist with its merger with another company. Background XUMUC has the WAN links in place to the new locations in the Houston Region. XUMUC currently has 2 other Regions San Francisco and Denver. Originally, XUMUC was only in one region (San Francisco). The previous consultant did a poor job with the integration resulting in a poor IP address scheme as a result routing tables at the summarization points and at the San Francisco Campus are very large. In addition, no VLAN structure was developed to isolate broadcast traffic. There are 4 main departments in XUMC: sales, finance, human resources, and research and development. Also, there has been some concern that the WAN transport was not able to accommodate the network traffic. Finally, all addresses in the network are statically assigned resulting in high administration overhead when changes are made. XUMC would like this changed to lower administrative overhead. IP ADDRESSING TABLE

Location

Number of IP Addresses Required Address Block Assigned

San Francisco 1290 172.16.0.0-172.16.7.255/21 Denver Region Denver Campus 441 Remote Office 1 28 Remote Office 2 35 Houston Region Houston Campus 329 Remote Office 3 21

IP Subnet Design Project.

2 | P a g e

Deliverables There are a number of requirements for this project.

• The document should contain: o Title page o Table of Content page o Executive summary o Technical details (including any assumptions)

 Details that address all issues described above  Completed IP addressing table (including summarized routes for

the Denver and Houston regions),  Updated network diagram  Supporting arguments

o Conclusion o Reference page

Formatting and Length: • The paper must be at least 1000 words in length. Word count does not include

words in diagrams, tables, large quotations from sources, or other attachments. The length should not exceed 15 pages; recommended length is 8-9 double- spaced pages.

• Use 1" margins. The font should be 12-point, Arial. Include page numbers in your document, as well as your name and date somewhere in the document (e.g., on a title page).

XMUMC Network Diagram

IP Subnet Design Project.

3 | P a g e

IP Subnet Design Project

4 | P a g e

Grading Rubric for Term Papers (Courtesy of Noah Lilian)

Qualities & Criteria Poor (0-80) Good (80-90) Excellent (90-100)

Format/Layout

• Presentation of the text • Structuring of text • Follows requirements of

length, font and style

(Weight 15%)

Follows poorly the requirements related to format and layout.

Follows, for the most part, all the requirements related to format and layout. Some requirements are not followed.

Closely follows all the requirements related to format and layout.

Content/Information

• All elements of the topics are addressed

• The information is technically sound

• Information based on careful research

• Coherence of information

(Weight 50%)

The essay is not objective and addresses poorly the issues referred in the proposed topic. The provided information is not necessary or not sufficient to discuss these issues.

The essay is objective and for the most part addresses with an in depth analysis most of the issues referred in the proposed topic. The provided information is, for the most part, necessary and sufficient to discuss these issues.

The essay is objective and addresses with an in depth analysis all the issues referred in the proposed topic. The provided information is necessary and sufficient to discuss these issues.

Quality of Writing

• Clarity of sentences and paragraphs

• No errors and spelling, grammar and use of English

• Organization and coherence of ideas

(Weight 20%)

The essay is not well written, and contains many spelling errors, and/or grammar errors and/or use of English errors. The essay is badly organized, lacks clarity and/or does not present ideas in a coherent way.

The essay is well written for the most part, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The essay is for the most part well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.

The essay is well written from start to finish, without spelling, grammar or use of English errors. The essay is well organized, clear and presents ideas in a coherent way.

References and use of references

• Scholarly level of references

• How effective the references are used in the essay

• Soundness of references • APA style in reference list

and for citations

(Weight 15%)

Most of the references used are not important, and/or are not of good/scholarly quality. There is not a minimum of 4 scholarly resources, and/or they are not used effectively in the essay. References are not effectively used, and/or correctly cited and/or correctly listed in the reference list according to APA style.

Most of the references used are important, and are of good/scholarly quality. There is a minimum of 4 scholarly resources that are for the most part used effectively in the essay. Most of the references are effectively used, correctly cited and correctly listed in the reference list according to APA style.

All the references used are important, and are of good/scholarly quality. There is a minimum of 4 scholarly resources that are used effectively in the essay. All the references are effectively used, correctly cited and correctly listed in the reference list according to APA style.

IP Subnet Design Project

5 | P a g e

Overriding criterion: Originality and authenticity. If the essay is identified as not being original, and/or not done by the student, the instructor has the right to grade the paper as an F.