Budget and Finance
chick
pad_505_assignment_4_grading_rubrics.docGrading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic/organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
|
Points: 225 |
Assignment 4: Implementing the Budget |
|||
|
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 70% F |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
|
1. Find the variances for both the revenue and expenditures sides and then discuss two to three (2-3) problematic areas for the agency. Provide the results of the variances in a table (Excel or Word). Weight: 45% |
Did not submit or incompletely found the variances for both the revenue and expenditures sides and then did not submit or incompletely discussed two to three (2-3) problematic areas for the agency.Did not submit or incompletely provided the results of the variances in a table (Excel or Word). |
Partially found the variances for both the revenue and expenditures sides and then partially discussed two to three (2-3) problematic areas for the agency.Partially provided the results of the variances in a table (Excel or Word). |
Satisfactorily found the variances for both the revenue and expenditures sides and then satisfactorily discussed two to three (2-3) problematic areas for the agency.Satisfactorily provided the results of the variances in a table (Excel or Word). |
Thoroughly found the variances for both the revenue and expenditures sides and then thoroughly discussed two to three (2-3) problematic areas for the agency.Thoroughly provided the results of the variances in a table (Excel or Word). |
|
2. Recommend two (2) policy actions for each problematic area discussed in criterion 1. Justify therecommendations. Weight: 45% |
Did not submit or incompletely recommended two (2) policy actions for each problematic area discussed in criterion 1. Did not submit or incompletely justifiedthe recommendations. |
Partially recommended two (2) policy actions for each problematic area discussed in criterion1. Partially justifiedthe recommendations. |
Satisfactorily recommended two (2) policy actions for each problematic area discussed in criterion 1. Satisfactorily justifiedthe recommendations. |
Thoroughly recommended two (2) policy actions for each problematic area discussed in criterion 1. Thoroughly justifiedthe recommendations. |
|
3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10% |
More than 6 errors present |
5-6 errors present |
3-4 errors present |
0-2 errors present |
