Art Comparison

ART 217—Survey of Art History II—Decker—Spring 2014 
 





Scoring
Criteria
 (across‐‐‐>)
 
 Grading
Scale
(down)


Criteria
1:

 opinion
of
Barnet;
use
footnotes


Criteria
2:

 apply
explanation
to
one
work
from
Jacobs
 

Criteria
3:

 worksheet
completed


Criteria
4:
 one
source
through
database
or
 other
scholarly
material


Excellent
(10‐9):

 Shows
a
complete
 understanding
of
this
criteria
 and
is
exceptional
in
the
 level
of
detail
and
 sophistication;
excellent
 punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 


Average
(8‐7):

 Shows
a
reasonable
 understanding
of
this
criteria
 and
uses
and
acceptable
 level
of
detail;
good
 punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 


Poor
(6):

 Failed
to
demonstrate
 understanding
of
this
 criteria‐
little
thought
or
 consideration
given;
less
 than
average
punctuation,
 grammar



 
 
 


Failure
(5
or
lower):

 Work
is
plagiarized,
 inappropriate
to
the
task
or
 level
of
the
assignment.
 Indicates
an
absence
of
 understanding
or
effort.



 
 
 


ART 217—Survey of Art History II—Decker—Spring 2014 
 








Scoring
Criteria
 (across‐‐‐>)
 
 Grading
Scale
(down)


Criteria
1:

 outline
(that
matches
2
page
analysis)


Criteria
2:

 2
page
analysis

 500
words

  

Criteria
3:

 use
terms
from
Barnet


Criteria
4
a
&
b:

 second
source
through
database
or
 other
scholarly
material
 &

 
 submitted
earlier
assignment


Excellent
(10‐9):

 Shows
a
complete
 understanding
of
this
 criteria
and
is
exceptional
in
 the
level
of
detail
and
 sophistication;
excellent
 punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 


Average
(8‐7):

 Shows
a
reasonable
 understanding
of
this
 criteria
and
uses
and
 acceptable
level
of
detail;
 good
punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 


Poor
(6):

 Failed
to
demonstrate
 understanding
of
this
 criteria‐
little
thought
or
 consideration
given;
less
 than
average
punctuation,
 grammar



 
 
 


Failure
(5
or
lower):

 Work
is
plagiarized,
 inappropriate
to
the
task
or
 level
of
the
assignment.
 Indicates
an
absence
of
 understanding
or
effort.



 
 
 


ART 217—Survey of Art History II—Decker—Spring 2014 
 











Scoring
Criteria
 (across‐‐‐>)
 
 Grading
Scale
(down)


Criteria
1:
x
2
 2
pages
of
notes
for
your
comparison
 (is
there
enough
content
to
“take
a
 shared
approach
to
the
work
that
you
 have
selected
from
the
Jacobs
Collection
 and
the
work
that
you
have
selected
 from
the
textbook....”
 
 


Criteria
2:

 Image
citation
for
Jacobs
work
and
 Stokstad
work
  

Criteria
3:

 use
terms
from
Barnet
and
terms
from
 Stokstad



Criteria
4
(+/‐):

 
 submitted
earlier
assignments
(ES1
and
 ES2)


Excellent
(10‐9):

 Shows
a
complete
 understanding
of
this
 criteria
and
is
exceptional
in
 the
level
of
detail
and
 sophistication;
excellent
 punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 


Average
(8‐7):

 Shows
a
reasonable
 understanding
of
this
 criteria
and
uses
and
 acceptable
level
of
detail;
 good
punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 


Poor
(6):

 Failed
to
demonstrate
 understanding
of
this
 criteria‐
little
thought
or
 consideration
given;
less
 than
average
punctuation,
 grammar



 
 
 


Failure
(5
or
lower):

 Work
is
plagiarized,
 inappropriate
to
the
task
or
 level
of
the
assignment.
 Indicates
an
absence
of
 understanding
or
effort.



 
 
 


ART 217—Survey of Art History II—Decker—Spring 2014 
 

















Scoring
Criteria
 (across‐‐‐>)
 
 Grading
Scale
 (down)


Criteria
1:

 Thesis
double
underlined
 
 (structure
and
content
of
thesis)
 


Criteria
2:

 Supporting
claims
outlined
singly
 
 (structure
and
content
of
thesis)
  

Criteria
3:

 use
terms
from
Barnet
and
 terms
from
Stokstad

 
 support
claims
and
thesis
and
 illustrate
these



Criteria
4:

 image
citation
and
footnotes
 properly
done


Criteria
5:
 
 submitted
earlier
assignments
 (ES1
and
ES2
and
ES3)


Excellent
(10‐9):

 Shows
a
complete
 understanding
of
this
 criteria
and
is
 exceptional
in
the
level
 of
detail
and
 sophistication;
excellent
 punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 
 


Average
(8‐7):

 Shows
a
reasonable
 understanding
of
this
 criteria
and
uses
and
 acceptable
level
of
 detail;
good
 punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 
 


Poor
(6):

 Failed
to
demonstrate
 understanding
of
this
 criteria‐
little
thought
or
 consideration
given;
less
 than
average
 punctuation,
grammar



 
 
 
 


Failure
(5
or
 lower):

 Work
is
plagiarized,
 inappropriate
to
the
 task
or
level
of
the
 assignment.
Indicates
 an
absence
of
 understanding
or
effort.