CIVIL ENGG / PHYSICS HELP IN REPORT
instructionss.docx
just to make sure again i need u to extend the : introduction. literature review. adding conclusion. adding recomendation adding appendix adding references (for what i have now and what you will write more) the report now is 40 pages aprox i want it to be 65 pages (including everything.. apendix, referances, etc...)
transmission-tower.docx
Content
Chapter one: Introduction.................................................................................................
Chapter two: Literature review......................................................................................
Chapter three: Design and analysis.................................................................................
Chapter four: results and discussion..............................................................................
Chapter five: conclusion and recommendation..................................................................
Chapter one
Introduction
Electrical Power transmission towers are used to support a transmission line's phase conductors and shield wires for the transmission of voltages in excess of 345kV or less than that depending on the kind of structure and material used and the transmission requirement. The transmission tower structures can broadly be categorized into lattice types or the pole types. Whereas pole types can be made of wood, concrete or steel and used for lower voltage transmission, the lattice types are usually made of sections of steel angles and are used for higher voltages transmission. Also each transmission structure can be self supporting or it can be guyed. Another factor that affects design choice is the nature of prevalent climatic loads around the area of installation of transmission towers. Depending on the design loads, the configuration can vary largely between horizontal configuration, vertical or delta configuration and again accessibility and right of way issues will also have to be considered. Some relevant standards and codes will have to be followed in the design of transmission towers such as National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), ASCE loading code, OSHA operational safety codes, etc.
From the brief background given the main point is that in recent times some new tower designs that are both aesthetically pleasing and structurally sound have been required for the overhead transmission of power and this is what this project attempts to design.
Aim
The aim of the project is to investigate existing tower design literature and finally apply analyze and design a novel both aesthetically pleasing and structurally sound tower.
Loads on transmission towers
Before designing transmission tower structures state laws, rules and regulation will require that design follows standard codes in order to meet minimum for loading for acceptable level of safety. Relevant loading guidelines for electrical transmission line structural loading will have to be strictly followed to ensure safety and reliability under conditions like extreme ice, wind loads, safety and security loads.
Load calculations using codes
An example of loading calculation using NESC code groups wind and ice loads under heavy loading, medium loading and light loading. These codes specify the standard densities of ice and force coefficient required to calculate wind pressure.
Load structures
The structure loads are calculated in three directions which are:
· Vertical: These loads will include the weight of the structure with other superimposed loads such as transmission wires and ice coating.
· Transverse: The transverse loads are perpendicular to the transmission lines and are caused by pressure of the wind on the transmission wires and the tower structure.
· Longitudinal: These loads are parallel to the transmission line
Chapter two
Literature review
Introduction
Transmission Line is considered as integrated system consisting of the supporting structure and functional system i.e. Electrical Systems and its components.
The geometry of the supporting structure is dependent on the electrical system which is based on the line voltage. The electrical system includes:
• Conductor subsystem consisting of conductor and its holding clamps.
• Ground wire subsystem consisting of ground wire and its holding clamps.
In design of tower for weight optimization, the basic parameters of the structure are constrained on the basis for electrical requirements and these include:
· Base width.
· Height of the tower.
· Outline of the tower
One of the important concern is the structure must be able to resist both vertical and lateral loadings. Although the forces due to wind or earthquake are dynamic in nature, it is assumed static forces to simplify the analysis and design process. Values of static wind loading equivalents and factors are provided in NESC loading (National Electrical Safety Code, 2002) and CP 3: Chapter V: Part 2:1972/BS 6399-2:1997- Code of practice for wind loads.
Specification and Properties of the Structure
A transmission line tower, like any other exposed structure, has a super structure suitably shaped, dimensioned and designed to sustain the external loads acting on the strung cables (conductors and ground wires) and the super structure itself. The superstructure has a trunk and a hamper (cage) to which cables are attached, either through insulators or directly.
A.S.C.E manual “Guidelines for Electrical Transmission Line Structural Loading” has distinguished the overall configuration of a transmission line structure on the basis of following requirements:
• Ground clearance requirements
• Electric air gap clearance requirements
• Electric and magnetic field limits
• Insulation requirements
• Structural loading
• Number of circuits
• Right of way requirements
Determination of height
The configuration of a transmission line tower is dependent on the following parameters:
· Minimum permissible ground clearance, h1
· Maximum sag, h2
· Vertical spacing between conductors, h3
Figure 3.1 Determination of Tower Height
· Vertical clearance between earthwire and top conductor, h4
CBIP in its “Transmission Line Manual” has summed up the total height of a transmission line tower as summation of the following:
h=h1 + h2 + h3 + h4
Ground Clearances
It is the minimum distance from the ground to the lowest point of the bottom conductor. It is fixed as per the requirement of electric air gap clearance and the electric and magnetic field limitations.
The minimum permissible ground clearance as per IE Rules, 1956, Rule 77(4) can be determined from the equation
CL = 5.182 + 0.305*K
Where K =
Spacing between Conductors (Phases)
1) Mecomb’s Formula
Spacing (cm) =
Where:
V = Voltage of System in kV
D = Diameter of Conductor in cm
S = Sag in cm
W = Weight of Conductor in kg/m
2) VDE Formula
Spacing (cm) =
Where:
V = Voltage of System in kV
S = Sag in cm
3) Still’s Formula
Spacing (cm) =
Where:
V = Voltage of System in kV
l = Average span length (m)
4) NESC Formula
Spacing (cm) =
Where:
V = Voltage of System in kV
S = Sag in cm
L = Length of Insulator String in cm
5) Swedish Formula
Spacing (cm) =
Where:
E = Line Voltage in kV
S = Sag in cm
L = Length of Insulator String in cm
Table 3.1 Recommended Ground Clearance for Voltage Levels
|
Voltage Level |
Ground Clearance (m) |
|
<=33 kV |
5.20 |
|
66 kV |
5.49 |
|
132 kV |
6.10 |
|
220 kV |
7.01 |
|
400 kV |
8.84 |
6) French Formula
Spacing (cm) =
Where:
E = Line Voltage in kV
S = Sag in cm
L = Length of Insulator String in cm
Length of suspension insulator string:
It is an important parameter in deciding the phase to minimum ground metal Clearance, which in turn decides the length of cross arms. It is a function of insulation level, power frequency voltage and service conditions (pollution, altitude, humidity).
Vertical clearance between ground wire and top conductor:
This vertical clearance is decided by the requirement of the peak clearance and the mid span clearance.
Peak clearance is dependent on the angle of shielding made by the ground wire to protect the power conductors against the direct lightning stroke and to conduct the lightning current to the nearest earthed point when contacted by a lightning stroke.
Mid span clearance is the spacing required at the null points between the ground wire and the conductor to safe guard the conductor from flashover during lightning.
Maximum Sag
Sag-tension calculation
The sag of the conductor is defined as the distance between the point of attachment of the cable to the insulator/ tower and the null point in the cable (earth wireand conductor). It is dependent on the size and type of conductor, climatic conditions (wind temp., snow) and span length.
The sag and tension of the conductor are subject to variations due to the changes in temperatures and loading. For spans of the order of 300 meters and less, the sag and tension calculation can be carried out by parabolic formula with sufficient degree of accuracy. For the case of very long spans, catenary formula gives more accurate results than parabolic.
The horizontal tension at the lowest point (H) shall normally be taken 60 N/mm2 for span less than 300 m and 100 N/mm2 for span greater than 300 m span. This tension will be treated as a pretension.
Table 3.2 Spacing Between Conductors
|
System Voltage |
Type of Tower |
Vertical Spacing btw Conductors (mm) |
Horizontal Spacing btw Conductors (mm) |
|
|
66 kV |
Single Circuit |
A(0-2o) |
1080 |
4040 |
|
|
|
B(2-30o) |
1080 |
4270 |
|
|
|
C(30-60o) |
1220 |
4880 |
|
|
Double Circuit |
A(0-2o) |
2170 |
4270 |
|
|
|
B(2-30o) |
2060 |
4880 |
|
|
|
C(30-60o) |
2440 |
6000 |
|
132 kV |
Single Circuit |
A(0-2o) |
4200 |
7140 |
|
|
|
B(2-30o) |
4200 |
6290 |
|
|
|
C(30-60o) |
4200 |
7250 |
|
|
|
D(30-60o) |
4200 |
8820 |
|
|
Double Circuit |
A(0-2o) |
3965 |
7020 |
|
|
|
B(2-30o) |
3965 |
7320 |
|
|
|
C(30-60o) |
3965 |
7320 |
|
|
|
D(30-60o) |
4270 |
8540 |
Table 3.2 Spacing Between Conductors (Cont’d)
|
System Voltage |
Type of Tower |
Vertical Spacing btw Conductors (mm) |
Horizontal Spacing btw Conductors (mm) |
|
|
220 kV |
Single Circuit |
A(0-2o) |
5200 |
8500 |
|
|
|
B(2-30o) |
5250 |
10500 |
|
|
|
C(30-60o) |
6700 |
12600 |
|
|
|
D(30-60o) |
7800 |
140000 |
|
|
Double Circuit |
A(0-2o) |
5200 |
9900 |
|
|
|
B(2-30o) |
5200 |
10100 |
|
|
|
C(30-60o) |
5200 |
10500 |
|
|
|
D(30-60o) |
6750 |
12600 |
|
400 kV |
Single Circuit |
A(0-2o) |
7800 |
12760 |
|
|
|
B(2-30o) |
7800 |
12760 |
|
|
|
C(30-60o) |
7800 |
14000 |
|
|
|
D(30-60o) |
8100 |
16200 |
Loads on Structure
Load on the structure are calculated in three directions: vertical, transverse, and longitudinal, the transverse load is perpendicular to the transmission line and the longitudinal act parallel to the line.
Vertical Loads (NESC Code)
The vertical load on supporting structures consists of the weight of the structure, loads during construction and maintenance plus the superimposed weight, including all wires, ice coated where specified. The vertical load is given by the following equations
Vertical load of wire Vw is given by the following equations:
Vw = weight of bare wire x vertical design span x OCF
Vertical design span is the distance between low points of adjacent spans
Longitudinal Loads
Longitudinal loads are unbalanced forces developed at the structure due to various conditions on the line such as broken wire loads, differential in adjacent span length in rugged terrain, inclined spans and non-uniform loading of adjacent spans.
Figurre 3.1 Sag and Tension Formulae
Transverse Loads
These are caused by wind pressure on wires and structure, and the transverse component of the line tension at angles.
Wind Load on Wires (NESC Code)
For wind on wires, the wind on the overhead ground wires and conductors are considered. The transverse load due to the wires is given by:
F = q x d x Horizontal Span x OCF
Where
F = Transverse Wind Load on Wire
q= Dynamic Pressure of the Wind
OCF= Overload Capacity factor
The horizontal span is the distance between midpoints of adjacent span
Wind Load on Structures (CP3: Chapter V: Part 2: Sept 1972)
The exposed areas of the structure members are also subjected to wind loads. The wind coefficient of the structure depends on the shapes of member sections, solidity ratio, angle of incidence of wind i.e. face wind or diagonal wind, and shielding. The transverse load due to wind is obtained by calculating the dynamic pressure due to wind speed, and multiplying with the effective area of the members modified by a coefficient as below:
Va = V x S1 x S2 X S3
Where V = Basic Wind Speed
S1 = Topography Factor
S2 = Factor of ground roughness, structure size and height above the ground
S3 = Factor of Statistical Concept
Dynamic Wind Pressure q = kVa2
Where K = 0.613
Va= Design Wind Speed
Hence Load due to Wind, F = CrqAe
Where
Cr= the Overall force Coefficient
q = Dynamic pressure of the wind
Ae = Effective area of face
Loading Criteria
The Loading Criteria for the transmission line as given by CBIP in “Transmission Line Manual” is as follows:
i. Reliability
ii. Security
iii. Safety
Reliability of a transmission system is the probability that the system would perform its function/ task under the designed load criteria for a specified period. Thus, this covers climatic loads such as wind loads and/or ice loads.
Security of a transmission system is the capacity of the system to protect itself from any major failure arising out of the failure of its components. Thus, this covers unbalanced longitudinal loads and torsional loads due to broken wires.
Safety of a transmission system is the ability of the system to provide protection against any injuries or loss of lives to human beings out of the failure of any of its components. Thus, this covers loads imposed on tower during the construction of transmission line and loads imposed on tower during the maintenance of transmission line.
Chapter Four
Analysis and Design
1
2
3
2 Analysis
The lattice tower has 12 panels basic wind speed of 47 m/sec with open terrain with well scattered obstructions having height generally 1.5 m to 10 m (this category includes normal country lines with very few obstacles) and return period of design loads of 50 years was considered. The basic wind speed is applicable at 10 m height above mean ground level and based on peak gust averaged over a short time interval of about 3 seconds corresponding to mean height above ground level in an open terrain.
1.
2.
3.
4.
4.1 Configuration of Tower
· Base Width: 8.5m X 8.5m (Square Base)
· Hamper (Cage) Width (L.C.A): 3.6m X 3.6m
· Topmost Hamper width (Ground Wire): 2m X 2m
· Total Tower Height: 50m
· Permissible Weight Span:
Normal Condition: Maximum: 525 mm; Minimum: 200 mm
Broken Wire Condition: Maximum: 315 mm; Minimum: 100 mm
· Design Span: 350 mm
· Wind Span = Normal Span: 400 mm
· Weight Span: 550 mm
· Concrete Level to Ground Level: 225 mm
4.2 Transmission Line Components
The following parameters for transmission line and its components are assumed:
· Transmission Line Voltage: 220 kV (A. / C.)
· Tower Type: Suspension Tower
· Tower Configuration: Vertical Conductor Configuration
· No. of Circuits: Double
· Angle of Line Deviation: 0 to 2 degrees
· Terrain Type Considered: Plain
· Terrain Category: 2 (Normal cross country lines with very few obstacles)
· Return Period: 50 yrs
· Wind Zone: 4
· Basic Wind Speed: 47 m/s
· Basic Wind Pressure: 71.45 kg/sqm
· Weight of Insulator Disk: 3.5kN
· Weight of Ground Wire Attachment: 2.00kN
· Cross Arm: Pointed
4.3 Conductor and Ground Wire Parameters
· Conductor Material: ACSR, (Aluminum Conductor Steel Reinforced)
· Maximum Temperature: 75°C (ACSR)
· Number of Ground Wires: Single
· G.W. Type: Earth wire – 7 / 3.66
· Shielding Angle: 30o
· Maximum Temperature: 53°C (7 / 3.66)
· Insulator Type: I String
· Number of Insulator Discs: 14
· Size of Insulator Disc: 255 * 145 mm (Skirt Diameter)
· Length of Insulator String: 2,340 mm
· Minimum Ground Clearance: 7,500 m Sag Error Considered: 160 mm
· Mid Span Clearance: 8,500 mm
· Minimum Height above G.L.: 50,000 mm
· Phase to Phase Clearance: Vertical Spacing between Conductors (Minimum): 7,500 mm.
· Horizontal Spacing between Conductors (Minimum): 8,500 mm
· Lightning Impulse Level (Air Clearance): 1700 mm
· Minimum Phase to Earth (Air Clearance): 1970 mm
· Minimum Thickness of Member: Leg Member, G.W. Peak and Lower Member of C.A.: 5 mm; Others: 4 mm
4.4 Sag and Tension
Sag Tension Calculation by using the Catenary formula for Span >300m computed in Excel Spreadsheet for both the conductor and ground wire. The results of the Sag and Tension Calculations are given in Table 4.1, the detailed calculations are shown in Appendix 1.
Table 4.1 Sag and Tension in Wires
|
|
Conductors |
G.Wire |
||
|
Height of Crossarms, Z (m) (above Tower base) |
28.2 |
36.2 |
44.2 |
50.0 |
|
Mean Wind Speed, VZ(m/s) |
41.3 |
43.0 |
44.5 |
45.4 |
|
Dynamic Wind Pressure,Vd (N/m2) |
1046.1 |
1136.0 |
1213.3 |
1263.7 |
|
Sag of Conductor, D (mm) |
19.9 |
21.0 |
22.0 |
56.6 |
|
Tension, T (kN) |
49.0 |
49.0 |
49.1 |
8.0 |
4.5 Loading
4.5.1 Wind Loading on Tower
The wind loads on the members of the tower were calculated according to BS CP3: Chapter V Part 2, 1972. The dynamic wind pressures calculated at the panel heights were applied to the panels to obtain equivalent load on the projected faces of the tower. The wind forces were applied to the leg members at the top and bottom ends of the panels. The forces due to the wind load are shown in Table 4.2. The detailed calculations and Panels are shown in Appendix 2.
4.5.2 Wind Loading on Conductor and Earth Wire
The wind loads on the members of conductors were calculated according to the NESC code, by applying dynamic wind pressure at the crossarms on the wind span and diameter of the wire. The wind forces were applied as transverse load at the tip of the crossarms. The forces due to the wind load on the wires are shown in Table 4.3. The detailed calculations are shown in Appendix 3.
4.5.3 Vertical Load
The vertical loads on the tower consists of the
· Self Weight of the tower members
This is computed automatically in the Software used for Analysis)
· The weight of the conductors, ground wire and insulators
This is computed by using the weight span of the wires
The longitudinal loads on the tower consist of forces due to broken wire conditions, and considered to be negligible under normal conditions
Table 4.2 Wind Force on Tower (Divided into 12 Panels)
|
Panel No |
Bottom Height (m) |
Wind Force (kN) |
|
|
Top Height (m) |
|
|
1 |
0 |
2.18 |
|
|
8.0 |
5.28 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
5.71 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
5.17 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
24.2 |
4.62 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
28.2 |
3.78 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
30.1 |
4.81 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
36.2 |
4.66 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
37.9 |
4.67 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
44.2 |
4.57 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
45.8 |
2.89 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
48.0 |
2.26 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
50 |
1.65 |
Table 4.3 Loads due to Conductor and Ground Wire
|
Load |
Vertical |
Transverse |
Longitudinal |
|
|
Normal Condition |
||||
|
Earth Wire |
3.14 |
5.14 |
0.00 |
|
|
Conductors |
U.C.A |
9.43 |
14.32 |
0.00 |
|
|
M.C.A |
9.43 |
13.54 |
0.00 |
|
|
L.C.A |
9.43 |
12.60 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken Wire Condition (Earth Wire) |
||||
|
Earth Wire |
3.14 |
5.00 |
7.98 |
|
|
Conductors |
U.C.A |
9.43 |
14.32 |
0.00 |
|
|
M.C.A |
9.43 |
13.54 |
0.00 |
|
|
L.C.A |
9.43 |
12.60 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken Wire Condition (Top Right Conductor) |
||||
|
Earth Wire |
3.14 |
5.14 |
0.00 |
|
|
Conductors |
U.C.A |
9.43 |
13.21 |
34.34 |
|
|
M.C.A |
9.43 |
13.54 |
0.00 |
|
|
L.C.A |
9.43 |
12.60 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken Wire Condition (Mid Right Conductor) |
||||
|
Earth Wire |
3.14 |
5.14 |
0.00 |
|
|
Conductors |
U.C.A |
9.43 |
14.32 |
0.00 |
|
|
M.C.A |
9.43 |
12.43 |
34.31 |
|
|
L.C.A |
9.43 |
12.60 |
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Broken Wire Condition (Lower Right Conductor) |
||||
|
Earth Wire |
3.14 |
5.14 |
0.00 |
|
|
Conductors |
U.C.A |
9.43 |
14.32 |
0.00 |
|
|
M.C.A |
9.43 |
13.54 |
0.00 |
|
|
L.C.A |
9.43 |
11.49 |
34.27 |
The longitudinal and vertical loads due to the wires are shown in Table 4.3. The detailed calculation notes are shown in Appendix 3
4.6 Modeling of Tower
The transmission tower is modeled as a three dimensional space truss using STAAD Pro V8, the loading are then synchronized at the tip of peak and at the three tips of the cross arms. (Appendix 8)
4.7 Load and Load Conditions
The following Load Combinations were considered for the design of the Transmission tower: (Appendix 9)
· Normal Condition- SelfWeight of Structure, Vertical and Transverse Load of Wires
· Broken Wire Conditions
· Earth Wire-Self Weight, Vertical, Transverse and Longitudinal Load due to broken earth wire
· Top Right Conductor-Self Weight, Vertical, Transverse and Longitudinal Loads due to Broken Top right conductor
· Middle Right Conductor-Self Weight, Vertical, Transverse and Longitudinal Loads due to Broken middle right conductor
· Bottom Right Conductor-Self Weight, Vertical, Transverse and Longitudinal Loads due to Broken bottom right conductor
Figure 4.1a-d below depicts the loading conditions.
4.8 Preliminary Design of Tower
The tower is designed using the Limit States Design Approach of BS 5950:2000.
Preliminary member sizing is done to provide input data for the analysis of the tower, the result of the forces and stresses in the members during the first analysis is then used to redesign the tower. These steps are repeated until an optimum and conservative member section is attained
.
Figure 4.1a Loading Tree for Normal Condition
Figure 4.1b Loading Tree for Broken Wire Condition (GW)
Figure 4.1c Loading Tree for Broken Wire Condition (TR)
Figure 4.1d Loading Tree for Broken Wire Condition (MR)
Figure 4.1b Loading Tree for Broken Wire Condition (BR)
Figure 4.2 2D Wire Frame Tower Model
Chapter Five
Results and Discussion
5
Results
5.1 Maximum Forces in Leg Members
The maximum forces in the Leg Members are as summarized as follows. (See Appendix 4 )
Table 5.1 Maximum compressive and Tensile Forces in Leg Members
|
Panel No. |
Compressive Force (kN) |
Tensile Force (kN) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
597.05 |
510.16 |
|
2 |
563.06 |
479.79 |
|
3 |
495.57 |
424.64 |
|
4 |
429.10 |
368.43 |
|
5 |
358.44 |
308.12 |
|
6 |
363.25 |
303.53 |
|
7 |
308.51 |
265.17 |
|
8 |
181.46 |
145.39 |
|
9 |
137.80 |
109.11 |
|
10 |
51.70 |
39.67 |
|
11 |
31.23 |
20.40 |
|
12 |
8.31 |
5.24 |
5.2 Maximum Forces in the Cross Arms
The maximum forces in the Cross Arms from Analysis are summarized in the table below. (See Appendix 4)
Table 5.2 Maximum Forces in Cross Arms
|
Cross Arms |
Compressive Force (kN) |
Tensile Force (kN) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Cross Arm |
Upper Member |
46.07 |
27.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Member |
9.66 |
41.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mid Cross Arm |
Upper Member |
52.45 |
31.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Member |
12.10 |
44.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Upper Cross Arm |
Upper Member |
63.83 |
39.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Member |
18.72 |
52.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top Cross Arm (Peak) |
Upper Member |
8.52 |
3.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lower Member |
2.50 |
10.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 Maximum Forces in the Horizontal Lattices
The maximum forces in the lattice members from Analysis are shown in the table below: (See Appendix 4)
Table 5.3 Maximum Forces in horizontal members
|
Panel No. |
Compressive Force (kN) |
Tensile Force (kN) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
63.56 |
77.32 |
|
2 |
54.96 |
67.36 |
|
3 |
63.93 |
78.14 |
|
4 |
71.66 |
86.39 |
|
5 |
31.49 |
49.47 |
|
6 |
15.79 |
23.17 |
|
7 |
31.14 |
11.37 |
|
8 |
13.09 |
28.46 |
|
9 |
38.60 |
5.82 |
|
10 |
7.71 |
30.57 |
|
11 |
4.76 |
3.18 |
|
12 |
1.62 |
4.41 |
5.4 Maximum Forces in the Secondary bracings
The maximum forces in the secondary braces from Analysis are shown in the table below: (See Appendix 4)
Table 5.4 Maximum Force in secondary braces
|
Panel No. |
Compressive Force (kN) |
Tensile Force (kN) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
84.57 |
63.96 |
|
2 |
56.28 |
52.71 |
|
3 |
74.26 |
54.62 |
|
4 |
84.35 |
61.24 |
|
5 |
98.62 |
74.24 |
|
6 |
46.26 |
46.39 |
|
7 |
75.60 |
69.77 |
|
8 |
31.56 |
33951.00 |
|
9 |
72.37 |
68.46 |
|
10 |
18.43 |
17.43 |
|
11 |
111.94 |
16.98 |
|
12 |
8.22 |
8.40 |
5.5 Maximum Reactions at Supports
The maximum reactions at the tower supports from Analysis are summarized in the table below; (See Appendix 5)
Table 5.4 Maximum Reactions at Support
|
|
Force-X kN |
Force-Y kN |
Force-Z kN |
|
1 |
86.38 |
572.46 |
81.97 |
|
2 |
65.79 |
487.19 |
77.10 |
|
3 |
86.87 |
605.46 |
95.65 |
|
4 |
91.09 |
684.21 |
109.41 |
5.6 Maximum Deflections
The maximum deflections along the tower height from Analysis are summarized in the table below; the detailed table of deflection is attached in the Appendix 6
Table 5.4 Maximum Deflection along Tower Height
|
Panel No. |
Height(m) |
Deflection (mm) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
8.0 |
5.8 |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
14.0 |
17.4 |
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
19.0 |
31.0 |
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
24.2 |
50.7 |
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
28.2 |
65.2 |
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
30.1 |
80.8 |
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
36.2 |
116.3 |
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
37.9 |
131.9 |
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
44.2 |
178.1 |
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
45.8 |
192.6 |
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
48.0 |
209.8 |
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
50.0 |
224.5 |
5.7 Design of Tower Members
The following sections have been designed to be adequate to resist the forces obtained from the analysis summarized above. The sections are selected based on the requirements of BS 5950: Part2, as grouped into Legs, Lattices, trusses and redundant members.
The table below shows a summary of the selected members
Table 5.5 Selected sections for Tower Members
|
Panel No. |
Equal Angles Section |
||
|
|
Leg |
Horizontal |
Bracing |
|
1 |
200x150x15 |
120x120x8 |
100x100x8 |
|
2 |
200x150x15 |
120x120x8 |
90x90x7 |
|
3 |
120x120x15 |
120x120x9 |
100x100x8 |
|
4 |
120x120x16 |
100x100x8 |
100x100x8 |
|
5 |
120x120x10 |
100x100x8 |
100x100x8 |
|
6 |
120x120x12 |
120x120x10 |
90x90x7 |
|
7 |
120x120x12 |
120x120x10 |
90x90x7 |
|
8 |
120x120x12 |
120x120x10 |
75x75x6 |
|
9 |
120x120x12 |
120x120x10 |
75x75x6 |
|
10 |
120x120x12 |
120x120x10 |
70x70x6 |
|
11 |
120x120x12 |
120x120x10 |
70x70x6 |
|
12 |
120x120x12 |
120x120x10 |
70x70x6 |
Table 5.5 Selected sections for Tower Members (Cross Arms) (cont’d)
|
Cross Arm |
Equal Angles Section |
|
|
|
Main Members |
Trusses |
|
LCA |
100x100x8 |
45x45x5 |
|
MCA |
100x100x8 |
50x50x4 |
|
UCA |
100x100x10 |
50x50x4 |
|
TCA |
50x50x4 |
45x45x5 |
The detailed code check is attached in Appendix 7
image6.wmf
image7.wmf
image8.wmf
image9.wmf
image10.jpeg
image11.png
image12.png
image1.png
image2.emf
image3.png
image4.wmf
image5.wmf
sample-only-for-help.docx
Analysis and design of transmission towers
Chapter one
Introduction
Electrical Power transmission towers are used to support a transmission line's phase conductors and shield wires for the transmission of voltages in excess of 345kV or less than that depending on the kind of structure and material used and the transmission requirement. The transmission tower structures can broadly be categorized into lattice types or the pole types. Whereas pole types can be made of wood, concrete or steel and used for lower voltage transmission, the lattice types are usually made of sections of steel angles and are used for higher voltages transmission. Also each transmission structure can be self supporting or it can be guyed. Another factor that affects design choice is the nature of prevalent climatic loads around the area of installation of transmission towers. Depending on the design loads, the configuration can vary largely between horizontal configuration, vertical or delta configuration and again accessibility and right of way issues will also have to be considered. Some relevant standards and codes will have to be followed in the design of transmission towers such as National Electrical Safety Code (NESC), ASCE loading code, OSHA operational safety codes, etc.
From the brief background given the main point is that in recent times some new tower designs that are both aesthetically pleasing and structurally sound have been required for the overhead transmission of power and this is what this project attempts to design.
Aim
The aim of the project is to investigate existing tower design literature and finally apply analyze and design a novel both aesthetically pleasing and structurally sound tower.
Loads on transmission towers
Before designing transmission tower structures state laws, rules and regulation will require that design follows standard codes in order to meet minimum for loading for acceptable level of safety. Relevant loading guidelines for electrical transmission line structural loading will have to be strictly followed to ensure safety and reliability under conditions like extreme ice, wind loads, safety and security loads.
Load calculations using codes
An example of loading calculation using NESC code groups wind and ice loads under heavy loading, medium loading and light loading. These codes specify the standard densities of ice and force coefficient required to calculate wind pressure.
Load structures
The structure loads are calculated in three directions which are:
· Vertical: These loads will include the weight of the structure with other superimposed loads such as transmission wires and ice coating.
· Transverse: The transverse loads are perpendicular to the transmission lines and are caused by pressure of the wind on the transmission wires and the tower structure.
· Longitudinal: These loads are parallel to the transmission line
Chapter two
Literature review
Introduction
Transmission Line is considered as integrated system consisting of the supporting structure and functional system i.e. Electrical Systems and its components.
The geometry of the supporting structure is dependent on the electrical system which is based on the line voltage. The electrical system includes:
• Conductor subsystem consisting of conductor and its holding clamps.
• Ground wire subsystem consisting of ground wire and its holding clamps.
In design of tower for weight optimization, the basic parameters of the structure are constrained on the basis for electrical requirements and these include:
· Base width.
· Height of the tower.
· Outline of the tower
One of the important concern is the structure must be a be to resist both vertical and lateral loadings. Although the forces due to wind or earthquake are dynamic in nature, it is assumed static forces to simplify the analysis and design process. Values of static wind loading equivalents and factors are provided in NESC loading (National Electrical Safety Code, 2002) and CP 3: Chapter V: Part 2:1972/BS 6399-2:1997- Code of practice for wind loads.
Loads on Structure
Load on the structure are calculated in three directions: vertical, transverse, and longitudinal, The transverse load is perpendicular to the transmission line and the longitudinal act parallel to the line.
Vertical Loads (NESC Code)
The vertical load on supporting structures consists of the weight of the structure, loads during construction and maintenance plus the superimposed weight, including all wires, ice coated where specified. The vertical load is given by the following equations
Vertical load of wire Vw is given by the following equations:
Vw = weight of bare wire x vertical design span x OCF
Vertical design span is the distance between low points of adjacent spans
Longitudinal Loads
Longitudinal loads are unbalanced forces developed at the structure due to various conditions on the line such as broken wire loads, differential in adjacent span length in rugged terrain, inclined spans and non-uniform loading of adjacent spans.
Transverse Loads
These are caused by wind pressure on wires and structure, and the transverse component of the line tension at angles.
Wind Load on Wires (NESC Code)
For wind on wires, the wind on the overhead ground wires and conductors are considered. The transverse load due to the wires are given by:
F = q x d x Horizontal Span x OCF
Where
F = Transverse Wind Load on Wire
q= Dynamic Pressure of the Wind
OCF= Overload Capacity factor
The horizontal span is the distance between midpoint of adjacent span
Wind Load on Structures (CP3: Chapter V: Part 2: Sept 1972)
The exposed areas of the structure members are also subjected to wind loads. The wind coefficient of the structure depends on the shapes of member sections, solidity ratio, angle of incidence of wind i.e. face wind or diagonal wind, and shielding. The transverse load due to wind is obtained by calculating the dynamic pressure due to wind speed, and multiplying with the effective area of the members modified by a coefficient as below:
Va = V x S1 x S2 X S3
Where V = Basic Wind Speed
S1 = Topography Factor
S2 = Factor of ground roughness, structure size and height above the ground
S3 = Factor of Statistical Concept
Dynamic Wind Pressure q = kVa2
Whre K = 0.613
Va= Design Wind Speed
Hence Load due to Wind, F = CrqAe
Where
Cr= The Overall force Coefficient
q = Dynamic pressure of the wind
Ae = Effecive area of face
Specification and Properties of the Structure
A transmission line tower, like any other exposed structure, has a super structure suitably shaped, dimensioned and designed to sustain the external loads acting on the strung cables (conductors and ground wires) and the super structure itself. The superstructure has a trunk and a hamper (cage) to which cables are attached, either through insulators or directly. Suffice it to say, a tower is very much like a tall tree.
A.S.C.E manual “Guidelines for Electrical Transmission Line Structural Loading” has distinguished the overall configuration of a transmission line structure on the basis of following requirements:
• Ground clearance requirements
• Electric air gap clearance requirements
• Electric and magnetic field limits
• Insulation requirements
• Structural loading
• Number of circuits
• Right of way requirements
• Aesthetic design criteria
IS 802: Part 1: Sec: 1:1995 states that the configuration of a transmission line tower is dependent on the following parameters:
• The length of the insulator assembly.
• The minimum clearances to be maintained between conductors and between conductor and tower.
• The location of ground wire or wires with respect to the outermost conductor.
• The mid span clearance required from considerations of the dynamic behavior of conductors and lightning protection of the line.
• The minimum clearance of the lowest conductor above ground level.
CBIP in its “Transmission Line Manual” has summed up the total height of a transmission line tower as summation of the following:
1. Minimum permissible ground clearance: It is the minimum distance from the ground to the lowest point of the bottom conductor. It is fixed as per the requirement of electric air gap clearance and the electric and magnetic field limitations.
2. Maximum sag: The sag of the conductor is defined as the distance between the point of attachment of the cable to the insulator/ tower and the null point in the cable (earth wire and conductor). It is dependent on the size and type of conductor, climatic conditions (wind
temp., snow) and span length.
3. Length of suspension insulator string: It is an important parameter in deciding the phase to minimum ground metalClearance, which in turn decides the length of cross arms. It is a function of insulationlevel, power frequency voltage and service conditions (pollution, altitude, humidity).
4. Vertical spacing between conductors: It is the minimum permissible spacing maintained between two conductors on thebasis of electrical requirements.
5. Vertical clearance between ground wire and top conductor: This vertical clearance is decided by the requirement of the peak clearance and themid span clearance.
Peak clearance is dependent on the angle of shielding made by the ground wire toprotect the power conductors against the direct lightning stroke and to conduct thelightning current to the nearest earthed point when contacted by a lightning stroke.
Mid span clearance is the spacing required at the null points between theground wire and the conductor to safe guard the conductor from flashover duringlightning.
Loading Criteria
The Loading Criteria for the transmission line as given by CBIP in “TransmissionLine Manual” is as follows:
i. Reliability
ii. Security
iii. Safety
Reliability of a transmission system is the probability that the system would performits function/ task under the designed load criteria for a specified period. Thus, this coversclimatic loads such as wind loads and/or ice loads.
Security of a transmission system is the capacity of the system to protectitself from any major failure arising out of the failure of its components. Thus, thiscovers unbalanced longitudinal loads and torsional loads due to broken wires.
Safety of a transmission system is the ability of the system to provide protectionagainst any injuries or loss of lives to human beings out of the failure of any of itscomponents. Thus, this covers loads imposed on tower during the construction oftransmission line and loads imposed on tower during the maintenance of transmission line.
Chapter three
Analysis and design
Transmission Line Components
The following parameters for transmission line and its components are assumed:
· Transmission Line Voltage: 220 kV (A. / C.)
· Right of Way (recommended): 35, 000 mm
· Angle of Line Deviation: 0 to 2 degrees
· Terrain Type Considered: Plain
· Terrain Category: 2 (Normal cross country lines
· with very few obstacles)
· Return Period: 50 yrs
· Wind Zone: 4
· Basic Wind Speed: 47 m/s
· Basic Wind Pressure: 71.45 kg/sqm
· Tower Type: Self-Supporting Tower, Suspension
· Type Tower, Tower Type “A”
· Tower Geometry: Square Base Tower
· No. of Circuits: Single Circuit
· Tower Configuration: Vertical Conductor
· Configuration
· Tower Shape: Barrel Shaped
· Bracing Pattern: Warren Type (Double Web
· System), Portal System (K Type)
· Cross Arm: Pointed
· Body Extension: Not Considered
· Steel Used: Mild Steel
· Slope of Tower Leg: 40 to 90 (Permissible)
· Conductor Material: ACSR, (Aluminium Conductor Steel Reinforced)
· Conductor Configuration: Zebra
· Maximum Temperature: 75°C (ACSR)
· Number of Ground Wires: Single
· Peak Type: Triangular
· G.W. Type: Earth wire – 7 / 3.66
· Shielding Angle: 300
· Maximum Temperature: 53°C (7 / 3.66)
· Insulator Type: I String
· Number of Insulator Discs: 14
· Size of Insulator Disc: 255 * 145 mm (Skirt
· Diameter)
· Length of Insulator String: 2,340 mm
· Minimum Ground Clearance: 7,000 m Sag Error Considered: 160 mm
· Creep Effect: Not Considered
· Mid Span Clearance: 8,500 mm
· Minimum Height above G.L.: 28,555 mm
· Width at Hamper Level: 1,500 mm (Square Tower)
· Width at Base: 4,500 mm (Square Tower)
· Phase to Phase Clearance: Vertical Spacing between Conductors (Minimum): 5,200 mm.
· Horizontal Spacing between Conductors (Minimum): 8,500 mm
· Lightning Impulse Level (Air Clearance): 1700 mm
· Minimum Phase to Earth (Air Clearance): 1970 mm
· Phase to Ground Metal Clearance:
· -Swing Angle:
0° - 2130 mm
15° - 1980 mm
30° - 1830 mm
45° - 1675 mm
· Tower Weight (Minimum): 2,570 kg
· Base Width (C.L.) / Height above G.L. = 1: 6.3
· Minimum Thickness of Member: Leg Member, G.W. Peak and Lower Member of C.A.: 5 mm; Others: 4 mm
· Permissible Weight Span:
Normal Condition: Maximum: 525 mm; Minimum: 200 mm
Broken Wire Condition: Maximum: 315 mm; Minimum: 100 mm
· Normal Span: 320 mm to 380 mm
· Design Span: 350 mm
· Wind Span = Normal Span: 350 mm
· Weight Span: 1.5 X 350 mm
· Concrete Level to Ground Level: 225 mm
Analysis of Load and Load Conditions
Sag Tension
Sag Tension Calculation by using the parabolic equations computed in Excel Spreadsheet for both the conductor and ground wire.
Parabolic Equation:
F22. (F2 – (K – α.t.E)) = L2.∂2.q22.E / 24
Take K= F – (L2.∂2.qo2.E / 24.F12)
|
Sag Tension for Conductor (ASCR) |
||||||
|
Temperature Variation (oC) |
0 |
|
32 |
|
|
75 |
|
Wind Variation (%) |
0 |
0.36 |
0 |
0.75 |
1.0 |
0 |
|
Tension (F*A) (kg) |
4060 |
4879 |
3222 |
5763 |
6804 |
2687 |
|
Sag (w.L2/8T) (m) |
6.114 |
5.088 |
7.471 |
4.307 |
3.648 |
9.239 |
|
Sag Tension for Ground Wire |
||||||
|
Temperature Variation (oC) |
0 |
|
32 |
|
|
75 |
|
Wind Variation (%) |
0 |
0.36 |
0 |
0.75 |
1.0 |
0 |
|
Tension (F*A) (kg) |
1520 |
2001 |
1327 |
2629 |
3127 |
1226 |
|
Sag (w.L2/8T) (m) |
5.874 |
4.462 |
6.725 |
3.395 |
2.855 |
7.824 |
Wind Loading on Tower
|
Height from Ground Level (m) |
Wind (kg) |
|
0 |
306 |
|
12.14 |
461 |
|
18.9 |
210 |
|
20.2 |
111 |
|
24.1 |
119 |
|
25.4 |
101 |
|
29.1 |
118 |
|
Total |
|
Modeling of Tower
The transmission tower is modeled as a three dimensional space truss using STAAD Pro V8, the loading are then synchronized at the tip of peak and at the three tips of the cross arms. The wind load is also applied to the truss at height along the main legs
3D Wireframe
3D Model
Typical Loading Pattern
Analysis of Tower
The following are the results of the analysis obtained from the analysis of the tower using StaadPro:
|
Maximum Force in the Leg Member |
||
|
Panel |
Tensile Load (kg) |
Compressive Load (kg) |
|
1 |
28214 |
31163 |
|
2 |
25880 |
28483 |
|
3 |
22318 |
24742 |
|
4 |
19262 |
21388 |
|
5 |
16195 |
18368 |
|
6 |
11833 |
13799 |
|
7 |
8330 |
9986 |
|
8 |
6786 |
7445 |
|
9 |
4986 |
6225 |
|
10 |
4597 |
6920 |
|
11 |
2668 |
4578 |
|
12 |
3509 |
4578 |
|
|
Maximum Force in Cross Arm |
||
|
|
|
Tensile Load (kg) |
Compressive Load (kg) |
|
Upper Cross arm |
Lower Member |
2302 |
5423 |
|
|
Upper Member |
5674 |
846 |
|
Lower Cross arm |
Lower Member |
3512 |
4952 |
|
|
Upper Member |
5163 |
1060 |
|
Maximum Deflection |
|
|
Height (m) |
Deflection (mm) |
|
0 |
0 |
|
18.9 |
73 |
|
20.2 |
100 |
|
24.1 |
121 |
|
25.4 |
131 |
|
29.9 |
177 |
Appendix