Crime Prevention Criminal Justice

profileEclpse1
first_discussion_response_from_student_ac.docx

FIRST DISCUSSION RESPONSE FROM STUDENT AC

There are a lot of troubled children or juveniles, youngsters (whatever you want to call them) in this world today. The question many ask is how we as a society should respond to them who straight up refuse to obey and listen to their parents? What can their parents do? What can the public officials do? What these youngsters or juveniles don’t know is they are being tested. They are testing them too purposely and forcible evaluate just how unpleasant they wish to control the juveniles lives. For years society has generally taken the position that these youngsters require intervention or at least could benefit from it. But left alone or ignored they will move down the path toward self- harm and serious criminal involvement. This article deals vaguely with the moral reasoning and more directly with the attempts and failures to intervene effectively in the lives of youth who commit status offenses simply because they commit such offenses. The attempts and failures occur at the federal level of state legislation and at the level of local community agencies. The attempts represent our assumptions with some consistency we seem to do the wrong things to the wrong juveniles for the wrong reasons. Most of this article explores the results of a complex assessment of status offender interventions that has come to be known as the DSO II project, the second major project in deinstitutionalization of status offender’s assessment to be funded by the office of juvenile justice and delinquency prevention. The article taught there are ways that are designed to demonstrate effective ways of removing and excluding status offenders from a secure confinement by providing alternative treatment for them.

References:

Klein, Malcolm W.; Maxson, Cheryl L.. Responding to Troubled Youth.Cary, NC, USA: Oxford University Press, USA, .1997http://site.ebrary.com/lib/ashford/Doc?id=10278845&ppg=16

(MUST PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON THIS DISCUSSION, NO NEGATIVE BUT POSITIVE REMARKS).

SECOND DISCUSSION RESPONSE FROM JE KN

Crime prevention is not the primary objective of sport and physical activity, but it might be an extremely positive product. Criminal justice professionals, politicians, and members of the community have realized that the patrol and investigative resources of the police are limited in preventing many types of crime and that the courts and prisons also have only a small impact on crime rates. Because of this there has been a greater emphasis on crime prevention programs that involve close cooperation between those working in the criminal justice system, other professionals, business people, and community residents. Such programs often use outdoor adventure activities, or ‘demanding physical activity programs’, aimed at developing personal and social skills, and improving self-confidence and self-efficacy. It is hoped that these will transfer to the wider social context and reduce offending behavior (Ehsani, et al., 2012).

Many of the core values inherent in sport are compatible with the principles necessary for development and peace, such as fair play, co-operation, sharing and respect. The life skills learned through sport help empower individuals and enhance psychosocial well-being, such as increased resiliency, self-esteem and connections with others. These features of sport are beneficial to people of all ages, but they are especially vital to the healthy development of young people (Ehsani, et al., 2012).

Sport, however, is a reflection of society. It should be acknowledged that sport, like many aspects of society, simultaneously encompasses some of the worst human traits, including violence, corruption, discrimination, hooliganism, excessive nationalism, cheating and drug abuse. However, these negative aspects of sport by no means outweigh its potential positive benefits (Ehsani, et al., 2012).

Central to the United Nations notion of development is sustainable human development, which recognizes that development is more than economic growth (Ehsani, et al., 2012). Development is a process of enlarging people’s choices and increasing the opportunities available to all members of society. Based on the principles of inclusion, equity and sustainability, emphasis is on the importance of increasing opportunities for the current generation as well as generations to come. Sport can directly help build these capabilities (Ehsani, et al., 2012). Sport and physical activity can combine with other interventions to reduce crime in particular groups and communities (Ehsani, et al., 2012). It appears that sport and physical activity can reduce crime by providing accessible, appropriate activities in a supportive social context. In other words, sport and physical activity must be connected positively within the social fabric of groups and communities. This does not suggest “one size fits all” strategies; instead, they represent the value of community development approaches to tailor programs to particularly needs of high-risk youth (Ehsani, 2012).

References: Ehsani, M., PhD., Dehnavi, A., M.Sc, & Heidary, A., PhD. (2012). The influence of sport and recreation upon crime reduction: A literature review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 2(6), 98-104. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1440572909?accountid=32521

(MUST PROVIDE FEEDBACK ON THIS DISCUSSION, NO NEGATIVE BUT POSITIVE REMARKS).