research paper
School budget cuts and education in the U.S.
Aya Fujita
Ms. Clowser
EFLN 170
5 December 2011
Fujita 1
Table of Contents
I. Introduction― The situation of the budget cuts on campus had been caused by the 1
financial crisis since 2007.
II. The causes of the budget cuts problem
A. Rose up the default rate in housing and housing financial sectors 1
B. The Subprime loan problem 2
C. Strong relation between property tax and state revenue 3
III. The situation of the budgets cuts
A. Example: Washington state 3
IV. The effects in school and measure by the Federal government
A. Inferior quality of school program and services 4
B. Many teachers and faculty laid off 4
C. Fiscal policies by the Federal government 6
V. Conclusion-The cause-and-effect of budget cuts and what I learned 8
VI. Works Cited 9
VII. Appendix 11
Comment [C1]: Table of Contents
includes the Works Cited page and the
Appendix
Fujita 1
Aya Fujita
Ms. Clowser
EFLN 170
5 December 2011
School budget cuts and education in the U.S.
“We are 99 percent!” One day, I found a bunch of protesters by faculty the center of
campus. The teachers and staffs were screaming together with signs that said slogans and
placed blame. I felt it was weird and out of the ordinary. The budget cuts have caused
unemployment of faculty. Some campuses of the Cal State system reduced employed
lecturers 20 percent or more, though lecturers account for more than half
of all the faculty. Lecturers who have Ph.D are expected to specialize to teach their expert
field not research for themselves (Lum 6). The reason obviously is the financial crisis,
which began in 2007. As this crisis has deepened, state budgets especially education
spending has been squeezed more and more. How has the financial crisis affected the
education budget cuts in the U.S.? What problems has the budget cut caused in our
educational system? How did the federal and state government deal with the problem of
the budget cuts?
The causes of the budget cuts problem
At first, I describe the cause of the financial crisis, especially so-called Subprime loan
Comment [C2]: Color Coding =
Yellow – writers voice
Green – In-text citation information
Grey – Paraphrased source information
Pink – Direct quotes from sources
Fujita 2
problem. The end of prolonged run-up in residential real estate in 2007 triggered the crisis.
Ashok Bardhan explains how the crisis had spread out all over the U.S., a downturn in
housing prices led to rising foreclosures, then, enterprises government owned, private
investment banks and financial companies securitized their assets back according to
collapsing real estate (1). “CDO (collateralized debt obligations) and other issuance went
up from $20 billion in 2004 to $180 billion in late 2006. The national amount of
outstanding credit default swaps reached $69 trillion. Thus the whole financial sectors
including the credit market were getting nonfunctional and insolvent” (Bardhan 1). This
is the brief cause of the spread of the financial crisis. Why did the woes spread all over the
U.S. as well as around the world?
Secondly, I would like to clarify the linkage between the housing market and the U.S.
economy. Bardhan describes the U.S. housing market is significant and has played an
important role from a view of demographics; this sector is also bound up with housing
finance, global finance, and shadow banking system(2). Gregory Mankiw explains this
problem from the view of macroeconomics, the Federal government lowered interest
rates to historically lower levels after the recession in 2001, which made the borrowers
easier to get a mortgage and buy a home. It contributes to rising in housing prices (332).
This is why and how housing market is likely to be affected by the shock of the economic
Fujita 2
systems.
As a third cause for the budget cuts in every state, one big issue is housing tax for
revenue in states. In addition, education spending is different between each state in the
U.S. Alyson Klien, in her article "Recession's Toll On Education Budgets Proves Both
Widespread And Uneven", demonstrates about this, though educational spending usually
accounts for more than a half of their budgets, except only a few unscathed states, almost
of all have been struggling terrible fiscal damages to which complex and regional factors
contribute to the worst economic crisis. This great recession has been enormously
widespread all over the United States though there are some differences in degree. A few
states with more agricultural economies or energy based economies protected them from
the funding effects of economic downturn. In some states that bore the brunt of the
foreclosure crisis in the housing market, the economic situation is particularly dire,
including Arizona, California, Florida, and Nevada. The impact on pre-collegiate
education is due to the strong link between property taxes and school funding (19).
The situation of the budget cuts
Therefore, because of the financial crisis, which the subprime loan problem originally
caused, at least 46 states plus the District of Columbia have been struggling to close
budget shortfalls and the effects of the recession. Sean Cavanagh suggests examples of
Fujita 2
severe budget cuts. ”Washington state officials suspended programs to reduce class size
and provide professional development for teachers saving $78.5 million and to $15.6
million”(6). I construct the following paragraphs for three effects, the problem in schools,
unemployment, and fiscal policies by the Federal government.
The effects in school and measure by the Federal government
The budget cuts have directly affected school programs and services. Klien suggests
Nevada to be said as an example of severe effects by the budget. Nevada, which
experienced the biggest housing boom, is still suffering from squeezing revenue and has
already taken drastic action. Many districts had to cut after-school classes like art, music
and drama. McBride, Lawrence, and Braun provide us some board members’ opinion.
They have removed the transportation and custodian services in a school in Michigan. A
school located in a valley is struggling significantly with decreases in enrollment, because
of higher gas prices and more leaving families in Idaho (13). Students and their family
also have to bear higher tuition. In Michigan, the education funding had run up from $154
to $7162 per student (Klien 17). A student at a California State University says her tuition
fees have skyrocketed more than 50 percent from her freshman year up to $4840 (Lum 8).
The other serious effect is many teachers and faculties have been laid off in many states.
The largest district in Nevada laid off more than 500 school employees in 2010 (Klien 18).
Fujita 2
Lum describes the situation in California, three higher education institutions, University
of California, California State University and California Community College have laid
off stuff, cut faculty pay and reduced the number of courses offered. Cal State University
employed less than 2100 lecturers, which accounts for 16 percent less (7). I took the
survey for 30 California State University Chico students about consciousness for this
problem. The following chart shows the results of the survey questionnaire.
(Fujita, Aya, 2011)
According to Table 1, first of all, in the question 1 and 3, ”The budget cuts have affected
your decision for your course” and “The courses and faculties in your department have
been getting less,” more than half of students agreed with these statements. This indicates
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
5
18
14 12
11
8
9 13 7
3
3
4 5
1
2
1 2 0
2 0
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Not Sure
Agree
Strongly Agree
Table 1
Comment [C3]: Table 1 correctly
introduced, labeled , and cited.
Fujita 2
the number of courses and faculties have decreased, which caused their decision for
courses. Moreover, 86.6% of the students agreed with the question 2 “You feel some
decrease in quality of programs and services”. Thirdly, we can see clearly most students
in California feel their “state has been damaged seriously” because of the crisis.
Though education differs from state to state, even district to district, the Federal
government cannot leave burgeoning unemployment alone without taking
countermeasures.
Finally, I illustrate the fiscal policies of the Federal government took place as the third
effect. Cindin and Leo suggest a fiscal stimulus by the Bush Administration’s Keynesian
turn of a $150 billion. It is evaluated that this has stimulated at the Federal level, but not
been done at the state level due to their massive dependence on property taxes.(28)
In comparison to the fiscal policy by Bush Administration, Cavanagh discusses about
the ARRA by the Obama Administration,
The financial duress would almost certainly have been much worse had it
not been for an unprecedented infusion of emergency federal aid over the
past two years, most notably some $100 billion in education funding
through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the $787 billion
economic-stimulus package passed by Congress in 2009 at the urging of
Comment [C4]: This paragraph is an
explanation of the content of the Chart.
Comment [C5]: Block Quote (Long
quote) Ten space indentation.
Fujita 2
President Barack Obama (7).
Due to the variance in need, the government has to weigh the amount each state and
district needs from this act. According to the Chart.2 from my survey, the surveyed
students’ opinions were split over government policy. 40 percent of the surveyed students
agreed with the statement, “The government should provide more subsidies for each state
even though our taxes will go up,” but 27 percent disagreed with the statement.
(Fujita, Aya, 2011)
Conclusion: the cause-and-effect of budget cuts and what I learned
In summary, the Subprime loan problem and housing collapse triggered the financial
Strongly Agree
20%
Agree
20%
Not Sure
33%
Disagree
17%
Strongly
Disagree
10%
Q5: The government should provide more subsidies for each state
even though our taxes will go up.
Table 2
Fujita 2
crisis and serious recession that has spread across the U.S. since 2007. The property tax
represents an important part in state revenue. The default problem has squeezed the state
budget. During this time of crisis, the education budget has been reduced, which has
caused many serious problems. Some notable effects of the budget cuts are less courses,
extracurricular activities and higher tuition. The dismissal of many teachers and faculty is
another more serious issue. Many professors who have Ph.D lost their position. The
Federal government proposed policies and put the ARRA in effect as protective measures.
They should have acted earlier to prevent some of the serious effects that we are
experiencing now such as reduced faculty and less courses. Additionally, the government
should consider the need state by state.
I read many articles, books related with the financial crisis and the educational system
in the U.S. in order to deepen the comprehension of the cause and effect of this problem.
All of the processes to complete this research paper became a good experience for me.
Also, I understand how the budget cuts problem is serious because it has caused various
effects on many lives of students and faculty. I hope this situation would get better soon at
least before the faculty’s anger reach the peak ‘100 percent’.
Fujita 2
Works Cited
Bardhan, Ashok. "Housing And The Financial Crisis In The US: Cause Or Symptom?"
Vikalpa: The Journal For Decision Makers 34.3 (2009): 1-7. Business Source
Premier.Web.26.Oct.2011.
Cavanagh, Sean. “Educators Regroup In Recession’s Aftermath”. Education Week,
Vol.30 Issue 16, p6-10, 5p, 13.Jan.2011. Academic Search Premier, EBSCO. 19
Oct.2011
Cindin, Sam, and Leo Panitch. "Perspectives On The U.S. Financial Crisis." Canadian
Dimension 42.4 (2008): 28-31. Academic Search Premier. Web. 6 Dec. 2011.
Fujita, Aya. Personal Survey. Nov. 2011.
Klien, Alyson. "Recession's Toll On Education Budgets Proves Both Widespread and
Uneven." Education Week 30.16 (2011): 16-19. Academic Search Premier. Web.
24Oct.2011
Lum, Lydia. "A Cut Below." Diverse: Issues In Higher Education 26.25 (2010): 6-9.
Academic Search Premier. Web. 7 Nov. 2011.
Mankiw, Gregory, N. Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publisher, 2009.
McBride, Linda L., Robert Lawrence, and Randal Braun. "Budget-Cutting Season Is
Upon Us." American School Board Journal 195.7 (2008): 12-13. Academic
Comment [C6]: Works Cited starts on its
own page. Title of Works Cited is
centered one inch down from the top.
Comment [C7]: All Source entries are
listed Alphabetically by authors last
name or title of Article, if there was no
author named.
Comment [C8]: NOTICE: You must cite
your Survey in your Works Cited page.
You are the “author”. ; )
Fujita 2
SearchPremier.Web.1Nov.2011.
Appendix
Fujita 2
Table.1,
Table.2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
5
18
14 12
11
8
9 13 7
3
3
4 5
1
2
1 2 0
2 0
Strongly Disagree
Disagree
Not Sure
Agree
Strongly Agree
Fujita 2
Strongly Agree
20%
Agree
20%
Not Sure
33%
Disagree
17%
Strongly
Disagree
10%
Q5: The government should provide more subsidies for each
state even though our taxes will go up.