For Expert_Researcher
MN502 Theoretical Foundations of Advanced Nursing
Scoring Rubric: Personal Philosophy Rubric
[100 points] – Due Unit 5
|
Project Content Criteria |
Unsatisfactory |
Satisfactory |
Above Average |
Excellent |
Total Points |
|
Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Describes the organizational definition and/or mission/vision statement. If not available, provides an explanation.
|
No paper or does not provide the organizational definition and/or mission/vision statement; or if not available, does not provide an explanation. |
The evaluation is brief and contains only a few concrete details. |
The evaluation contains many concrete details. |
The evaluation is thorough and extensive. |
|
|
|
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
A = ____ pts |
|
Provision of definitions of a concept from within the nursing philosophy using nursing literature. |
No paper or does not provide any definitions from the nursing literature. |
Definitions provided are not from the nursing literature. |
Provides a 2-3 definitions from the nursing literature. |
Provides 4-6 definitions from within the nursing literature. |
|
|
|
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
B = ____pts |
|
Develops definition of the concept for your organization with an explanation for the definition. |
No paper or does not redefine concept for the organization. |
Redefines the concept to apply to your organization, but it is poorly presented. |
Redefines the concept to apply to your organization; focus needs to be clearer. |
Redefines the concept to apply to your organization; definition and explanation are clear and well stated. |
|
|
|
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
C = ____ pts |
|
Description of how the concept supports your professional practice model.
|
No paper or does not describe how the concept supports your professional practice model. |
The description is superficial or unclear. |
The description is brief and needs more detail. |
The student clearly described how this concept supports the model of practice. |
|
|
|
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
D = ____ pts |
|
Format/Style |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are frequent errors in consistency of the text, title page, and references page with APA format. There are numerous errors in which iIdeas and information from other sources are not cited correctly. There are numerous errors in rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation. There are numerous spelling and/or proofreading errors. Overall style is inadequate for formal, professional work; many areas needs need style improvement. |
There are some errors, but much of the text, title page, and references page is consistent with the APA format. Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with few exceptions. Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with few exceptions. Assignment has few spelling and/or proofreading errors. Overall style is adequate for formal, professional work; some areas need style improvement. |
There are rare errors; most of the text, title page, and references page is consistent with APA format. Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly with rare exceptions. Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed with rare exceptions. Assignment has rare spelling and/or proofreading errors. Overall style is consistent with that expected of formal, professional work with rare exceptions. |
Text, title page, and references page are consistent with APA format. Ideas and information from other sources are cited correctly. Rules of grammar, word usage, and punctuation are followed. Assignment is spellchecked and proofread. Overall style is consistent with that expected of formal, professional work. |
|
|
|
5 |
10 |
15 |
20 |
E = ____ pts. |
|
|
|
|
TOTAL POINTS of 100 |
A + B + C + D + E = TOTAL PTS |
_____ pts. |
PAGE
1