personality theory project due tonight
PSY111 Personality Theory Project Rubric – 100 Points
Student Name_______________________
|
|
Excellent/Exceeds Expectations |
Good/Meets Most Expectations |
Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations |
|
|
Points Possible |
5 |
4 |
3-1 |
POINTS EARNED = |
|
(5 points) Part I a.) What is the underlying theory supporting the personality assessment you took? |
Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Fully supports description that explains how this assessment is an example of the theory selected. |
Correctly identifies the theory on which the assessment is based. Needs some additional detail to explain how this assessment is an example of the theory selected. |
Attempts to identify the theory on which the assessment is based. May identify incorrect personality theory OR needs significant detail to support theory selected. |
Feedback Comments:
|
|
Points Possible |
20-19 |
18-15 |
14-1 |
POINTS EARNED = |
|
(20 points) b.) Discuss the results of your assessment to show an understanding of the variables being assessed and the results. |
Complete discussion of assessment results to show an understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Fully supports discussion. |
Discusses assessment results to show an understanding of theory and most of the variables being assessed. Needs minor additional detail or support to be complete. |
Partial discussion of assessment results. Demonstrates partial understanding of theory and variables being assessed. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. |
Feedback Comments: |
|
Points Possible |
30-28 |
27-22 |
21-1 |
POINTS EARNED = |
|
(30 points)
c.) Application of assessment: Describe two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mention terms or traits from the personality assessment. |
Describes at least two events that exemplify how personality influences thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of event. Mentions the terms/traits in the personality assessment. Examples properly apply concepts from assessment/theory and show understanding of the personality trait in question. |
Describes two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Mentions some of the terms or traits from the personality assessment. Examples properly apply most concepts from assessment/theory and show some understanding of the personality trait in question. Needs minor additional detail to be complete.
|
Attempts to describe two events that exemplify how personality influenced thoughts, behavior, and/or outcome of the event. Demonstrates partial application of the results throughout examples OR example(s) are not appropriate application of results. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. |
Feedback Comments: |
|
Points Possible |
25-24 |
23-19 |
18-1 |
POINTS EARNED = |
|
(25 points)
Part II. Describe which theory most accurately explains personality development psychodynamic, humanistic, or cognitive-social. Justifies how this theory applies to personality development. |
Demonstrates ability to describe and apply theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Justifies how the theory applies to and exemplifies personality development. Fully supports description. |
Demonstrates some ability to describe and justify theory to explain personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs minor additional detail or support. |
Provides description of a personality theory and attempts to apply and justify how theory explains personality variation and development across the lifespan. Needs significant detail or support to be complete. |
Feedback Comments: |
|
|
Excellent/Exceeds Expectations |
Good/Meets Most Expectations |
Incomplete/Meets Partial Expectations |
|
|
Points Possible |
10-9 |
8-7 |
6-1 |
POINTS EARNED = |
|
(10 points) Writing Mechanics sentence structure, run-ons, fragments, agreement, punctuation, capitalization, spelling, etc. |
Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics, enhances the readability |
Demonstrates knowledge and use of writing mechanics but with errors that may detract from the readability |
Difficulties with readability due to inappropriate use of writing mechanics |
Feedback Comments: |
|
Points Possible |
10-9 |
8-7 |
6-1 |
POINTS EARNED = |
|
(10 points)
Writing Organization Coherence: all writing fits together, makes sense, and flows in effective order – beginning, middle, end
Clarity: all writing is consistent and logical |
Coherence: Well organized and purposeful writing; has beginning, middle, and end; strong and appropriate transitions Clarity: Expresses ideas clearly and logically
|
Coherence: Sequence of information difficult to follow; lacks a clear beginning, middle, and end; few or inappropriate transitions Clarity: Attempts to express ideas clearly; sometimes difficult to follow
|
Coherence: Unclear; lacks beginning, middle and end; fails to use transitions appropriately
Clarity: Disjointed connection of ideas; difficult to follow |
|
|
|
For each requirement not completed, points(s) will be deducted as explained below. (Maximum Deduction 10 Points) |
POINTS DEDUCTED: |
||
|
Requirements for basic APA document formatting and citations (Maximum Deduction 10 Points) |
Your assignment requires the following: - Name at top of document (-1 point) - 1 inch margins (-1 point) - Times/Times New Roman font (-1 point) - 12 point font (-1 point) - Double spaced (-1 point) - Informal citations within the worksheet (-1 point) - Informal list of references (-2 points) - Quotation marks when directly quoting a source (-2 points) |
Feedback Comments: |
||
|
|
FINAL SCORE: |
|||
|
Additional Feedback Comments:
|