HRM 594 Staffing Final Paper - I need help developing the paper - I started
Week 2 - Case 1
| TANGLEWOOD CASE 1 | Possible | Earned | Comments | Actual | Comments |
| Introduction | |||||
| Discussed case and scenario, which effectively introduced case. | 5 | 5 | |||
| Statements | |||||
| Effectively discussed Tanglewood’s business strategy and goals, which supported their decisions throughout the paper. | 20 | 10 | |||
| Statement Validation | |||||
| Addressed the 13 strategic staffing decisions and made a viable case for each decision based on Tanglewood’s background, business strategy, and goals. | 65 | 10 | |||
| 1. Acquire or develop talent | 5 | ||||
| 2. Hire or outsource | 5 | ||||
| 3. External or internal hiring | 5 | ||||
| 4. Core or flexible workforce | 5 | ||||
| 5. Hire or retain | 5 | ||||
| 6. National or global | 5 | ||||
| 7. Attract or relocate | 5 | ||||
| 8. Overstaff or understaff | 5 | ||||
| 9. Short- or long-term focus | 5 | ||||
| 10. Person job or person organization match | 5 | ||||
| 11. Specific or general KSAO | 5 | ||||
| 12. Exceptional or acceptable workforce quality | 5 | ||||
| 13. Active or passive diversity | 5 | ||||
| Conclusion | |||||
| Summarized paper with a well thought out conclusion. | 5 | 3 | |||
| Organization & Cohesiveness of Work | |||||
| Paper was organized with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation; was easy to read and understand; and was graduate-level writing. Followed APA or MLA formatting standards. | 5 | ||||
| Total | 100 | ERROR:#REF! | 0 |
Week 4 - Case 3
| TANGLEWOOD CASE 3 | Possible | Earned | Comments | Actual | Comments |
| Introduction | |||||
| Discussed case and scenario, which effectively introduced case. | 5 | 5 | |||
| Development of Recruitment Guide | |||||
| Presented a fully-developed recruitment guide. | 10 | 10 | |||
| Statement Validation | |||||
| Evaluated the various methods of recruiting for open or targeted. | 20 | 10 | |||
| Thoroughly reviewed how each method fares in terms of yields and costs. | 20 | ||||
| Effectively assessed Northern Oregon’s suggestion for other divisions. | 20 | ||||
| Identified and reviewed appropriate employee performance measures and addressed management concerns for these measures. | 20 | ||||
| Provided viable proposals for targeted, realistic, and branded recruiting messages for Tanglewood’s customer store associate positions, including review of traditional arguments for and against realistic recruiting policies. | 20 | ||||
| Conclusion, Organization, & Cohesiveness of Work | |||||
| Summarized paper with a well thought out conclusion. Paper was organized with proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation; was easy to read and understand; and was graduate-level writing. Followed APA or MLA formatting standards. | 5 | ||||
| Total | 120 | 25 | 0 | 0 |
Week 7 - Course Project
| Course Project | Possible | Earned | Comments | Actual | Comments |
| Title Page | |||||
| Title page provided, which included title of course paper, student name, email address, school name, instructor’s name, date of submittal, and Course ID # HR594. | 5 | 5 | |||
| Introduction | |||||
| Thoroughly introduced/described the selected strategic staffing topic and rationale. Provided background/facts to clearly review the issues. | 20 | 10 | |||
| Problem | |||||
| Identified and clearly stated the issues or problems. Assessment included an in-depth review, which identified the real problem(s). Combined or separated issues accordingly. Problem statement was short and concise. Specified point of view when identifying the problem. | 30 | 10 | |||
| Topical Area | |||||
| Connected problem to strategic staffing topical area. Included synthesis of at least four scholarly, professional studies, or articles that were relevant to inquiry. | 60 | ||||
| Causes | |||||
| Identified and described causes, which directly related to the problem/issue. Applied concepts and models from the text, class discussions, and literature review. Discussed concepts, ideas, or insights that substantiated the staffing problem core issue(s). Supported analysis with research. | 60 | ||||
| Solutions | |||||
| Suggested potential organizational consequences over the next year, two years, or more if no action taken. Provided recommendations and proposed at least two action steps that leveraged the organization towards a more desirable state. Thoroughly described action plan, including by whom, with whom, and in what sequence. Included substantive reflective statement about how assignment influenced personal, academic, and professional leadership and managerial development. | 40 | ||||
| Reflection | |||||
| Used at least eight scholarly resources (not including textbook). | 15 | ||||
| References | |||||
| Properly cited sources both in text and in a reference list following APA or MLA formatting standards. | 10 | ||||
| Total | 240 | 25 | 0 | 0 |