Business modeling
anserplouis
zz_airlines_simulation_case_study.doc
Nova Southeastern University H. Wayne Huizenga School of Business & Entrepreneurship
|
Assignment for Course: |
QNT5040-Business Modeling |
|
Submitted to: |
Dr. Phillip |
|
Submitted by: |
Nicole Mateus |
|
|
Robert Edson Abdellah Sabere Ralph Petit
|
Date of Submission: October 27, 2013
Title of Assignment: ZZ Airlines Simulation Case Study
CERTIFICATION OF AUTHORSHIP: I certify that I am the author of this paper and that any assistance I received in its preparation is fully acknowledged and disclosed in the paper. I have also cited any sources from which I used data, ideas or words, either quoted directly or paraphrased. I also certify that this paper was prepared by me specifically for this course.
Student's Signature: NM, RE, AS, RP___________
*****************************************************************
Instructor's Grade on Assignment:
Instructor's Comments:
|
TITLE OF RUBRIC: Case Analysis (Page 1 of 2) |
Course: QNT 5040 |
|
LEARNING OUTCOME/S: (see syllabus) |
Date: 10-27-13 |
|
PURPOSE: To facilitate effective decision making under uncertain conditions by quantifying risk. |
Name of Student: NM, RE, AS, RP |
|
VALIDITY: Best practices in Monte Carlo simulation. |
Name of Faculty: |
|
COMPANION DOCUMENTS: Assignment and format instructions, Case |
|
|
Earning maximum points in each box in ‘PROFICIENT’ column and / or points in columns to the right of ‘PROFICIENT’ meets standard. |
|||||
|
|
<<<<<<<<<< less quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . more quality >>>>>>>>>> |
|||||
|
Performance Criteria |
Basic |
Developing
|
Proficient
|
Accomplished
|
Exemplary
|
Score |
|
Identify the problem
|
Does not identify the problem, or does not identify the right problem. (0 pts) |
Identifies symptoms (5 pts) |
Identifies some elements of the problem. (10 pts) |
Substantially identifies the problem. (12 pt) |
Effectively and succinctly identifies the problem. (15 pts) |
|
|
Describes assumptions and methods
|
Does not describe assumptions and methods used (0 pts) |
Does not precisely describe the assumptions and methods used (3 pts) |
Somewhat describes assumptions and methods used (7 pts)
|
Substantially describes assumptions and methods used (8 pts) |
Effectively describes assumptions and methods used (10 pts)
|
|
|
Calculate statistics using a spreadsheet
|
Does not calculate appropriate statistics using a spreadsheet and/or does not provide evidence of calculations (0 pt) |
Calculates appropriate statistics using a spreadsheet (most answers are not correct) (13 pts) |
Calculates appropriate statistics using a spreadsheet (not all answers are correct) (21 pts)
|
Calculates appropriate statistics using a spreadsheet (most answers are correct) (25 pts)
|
Effectively calculates statistics using a spreadsheet (almost all answers are correct) (30 pts)
|
|
|
Explain implications of output of statistical analysis
|
Does not explain implications of output of statistical analysis (0 pt) |
Partially explains implications of output of statistical analysis (3pts) |
Somewhat explains implications of output of statistical analysis (7 pts)
|
Substantially explains implications of output of statistical analysis (8 pts) |
Effectively explains implications of output of statistical analysis (10 pts) |
|
|
TITLE OF RUBRIC: Case Analysis, cont. (Page 2 of 2) |
Course: QNT 5040 |
|
LEARNING OUTCOME/S: (see syllabus) |
Date: 10-27-13 |
|
PURPOSE: To facilitate effective decision making under uncertain conditions by quantifying risk. |
Name of Student: NM, RE, AS, RP |
|
VALIDITY: Best practices in Monte Carlo simulation. |
Name of Faculty: |
|
COMPANION DOCUMENTS: Assignment and format instructions, Case |
|
|
Earning maximum points in each box in ‘PROFICIENT’ column and / or points in columns to the right of ‘PROFICIENT’ meets standard. |
|||||
|
|
<<<<<<<<<< less quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . more quality >>>>>>>>>> |
|||||
|
Performance Criteria |
Basic |
Developing
|
Proficient
|
Accomplished
|
Exemplary
|
Score |
|
Generates solutions based on analysis and context
|
Does not generate appropriate solutions based on analysis and context. (0 pt) |
Generates solutions (does not justify conclusions). (7 pts) |
Partially: *generates and justifies solutions based on analysis and context; and *justifies conclusions. (15 pts) |
Substantially: *generates and justifies solutions based on analysis and context; and *justifies conclusions. (17 pts) |
Effectively: *generates and justifies solutions based on analysis and context; and *justifies conclusions. (20 pts)
|
|
|
Uses prescribed format (including cover sheet and grading rubric) and writing style (language, grammar, punctuation, and spelling)
|
Does not use prescribed format and writing style (0 pt) |
May use prescribed format OR writing style (only one) (3 pts)
|
Generally uses prescribed format and writing style (7 pts)
|
Substantially uses prescribed format and writing style (8 pts)
|
Effectively uses prescribed format and writing style (10 pts)
|
|
|
Uses APA format (APA Style Manual 6.0)
|
Does not provide references. (0 pt) |
Does not apply APA style to references. (1pts)
|
Partially applies APA style to references. (3 pts) |
Substantially applies APA style to references. (4 pts)
|
Effectively applies APA style to all references. Optimal quality and quantity of citations. (5 pts)
|
|
|
OVERALL GRADE (100 total possible points): |
% |
Comments: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
