two essay editing

profilei.hmda
rough_draft.docx

Ibrahim Abdulrahman Alhamdan.

Professor: Ms. Glick.

Class: 113A. Time: 08:00.

Everything has a Price

Weapons are like a double-edged sword. It could harm both sides whither you are defending or assaulting, in the past people have used it in wars to defend and attack people and it has its own price, weapons these days are used in unmoral way, it’s not surprising to hear about a gun shot that happened every time you read the news. Therefore, there is this movement poses that the government should have control on guns and there should intense laws about weapon position, and to whom is it going to be sold to, people are calling for having more laws on guns, people are tired of hearing about little kids getting killed for being in the wrong place and the wrong time, but still people are not seeing the big image of what it would happen if gun became more restricted or even banned.

The U.S have gained their freedom by fighting for it, even if it was war and it had a price, thousands of people were killed during the wars, but they were fighting for the right cause, freedom, so what would happen if those weapons are banned to people and they have taken possession of every weapon that people have, we could be back to the same days when the U.S wasn’t free, it has the same idea in one of the books that I’ve read –The Giver- it’s having a concept about if there was a society with no wars, crimes, or even violence between people, this society was safe, but still they striped them away from the right of being free, they don’t think for them self, they do what they were told to do, everyone has a job since the day he was born, and who ever obey the rules even for a good reason they get punished, that was one of the ideas that could happen that could lead people to forget why their grandfathers fought for, so that everyone have the opportunity that they didn’t have, freedom, thinking for your future, planning what you want to be when you grow up, making decisions.

That was one of the concepts if there were restricted laws about firearms position, but still having some resections won’t harm, not banning them for all of the people, instead we should keep it away from the wrong hands, every week there is a gun shot in the news and the amount of victims are raising, so there must be a problem in the roots, guns laws are not efficient that makes people who have psychological problems or even mental illness, they are not asked if they have any criminal records, we need to keep it away from the wrong hands, also laws should be restricted on the retailers, they should be careful to whom they are selling the weapons to, because not only the people in dangerous but also the people who made a commitment to protect those people are in dangerous.

Eventually, weapons are considered deadly but also used for self-defense, the National Rifle Association says “Guns don’t kill people, people do.’’, we don’t need to ban weapons if we had the right education to people about weapons usage and how they are a devise to protect your-self and not to a toy, they need to learn the responsibility that lays behind it.

Condon, George E., Jr. "Obama Will Bring Emotional Appeal for Gun Control." National Journal Daily 7 Apr. 2013. General OneFile. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.

Skelton, George. “Governor, Californians split on gun legislation.” latimes.com. Los Angeles Times Local, 10 Nov. 2013. Web. 13 Nov 2013.

Morabia, Alfredo, and Michael Costanza. “Evidence-based gun control.” sciencedirect.com. Science Direct, Oct. 2012. Web. 12 Nov. 2013.

LaFollette, Hugh. “Ethics.” jstor.org. J stor, Jan. 2000. Web. 13 Nov. 2013.