Acct504 Oracle vs Microsoft
Title Page
| Go to Doc Sharing for the detailed Course Project instructions and grading rubric. | ||||||
| Sharon K. Garland | ||||||
| Course Project | ||||||
| A Comparative Analysis of Oracle Corporation & Microsoft Corporation | ||||||
| Accounting 504 - Managerial and Finance | ||||||
| Professor: S. Wright | ||||||
| Date: February 07, 2014 (Revised - February 16,2014) | ||||||
Profiles
| ORACLE CORPORATION | ||||
| Oracle Corporation is a company that manages data management for companies. They have been in business for over 30 years and is currently known as the leader in database software. Under the leadership of Larry Ellis, Oracle has expanded into their technology footprint, from servers, and storage, to databases and middleware, through applications and into the "Cloud". Since the conception of Oracle in 1977, as a software development laboratory, since has been switched to relational software Inc. in 1979. Larry Ellison is the only CEO that has been at the helm of the Oracle Corporation. The CIA was one of the first companies that was hired software development for Oracle; which created a relational database for the spy organization. The CIA project was name Oracle. Larry Ellison was able to focus on the fact that there was a huge business need for relational database models. Oracle is now known for their innovated commercializing technology that now become or driving focus of the organization. The headquarters of Oracle is located in Redwood City, California; which has grown to a global corporation. | ||||
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | ||||
| Microsoft Corporation was founded by Bill Gates and Paul Allen in 1975 . Originally the company was based out of Albuquerque, New Mexico, but moved to Bellevue, Washington in the first quarter of 1979. The footprint of Microsoft consist of computer software, such as MS DOS operating system; which we are now much familiar or known as the Microsoft Window Operating System. Microsoft is now headed by Steve Ballmer chairman Bill Gages with the assistance of former chairman Bill Gates. Globally, the company roughly employees 92,000 staff members. The financial rating for Microsoft, is AAA; which was given to them by Standard and Poor's and Moody's for the fiscal year of 2011. Over the years, microsoft has introduced the following operating systems and applications...Microsoft Office Suite, the Xbox video gaming console, and peripherals and consumer electronics such as the Zune MP3 player and Windows OS phone and Skype. In 2011, Microsoft Research celebrates it's 20 year anniversary. |
Ratios
| RATIOS | Explanation | ||||||||
| Oracle Corporation | Microsoft Corporation | ||||||||
| Earnings per share (basic - common) | As given in the income statement | $ 1.69 | $ 2.73 | Microsoft has a higher earning share than Oracle does. | |||||
| Current ratio | Current assets | $39,174 | = | 2.76 | $74,918 | = | 2.60 | Oracle has more liquide asset than Microsoft against each unit of current liability. | |
| Current liabilities | $14,192 | $28,774 | |||||||
| Gross profit ratio | Gross profit | $24,101 | = | 67.7% | $54,366 | = | 77.7% | Microsoft has a higher gross margin than Oracle Corporation of 77.7 % opposed to Oracle 67.7% | |
| Net Sales | $35,622 | $69,943 | |||||||
| Profit margin ratio | Net Income | $8,547 | = | 24.0% | $23,150 | = | 33.1% | Microsoft has shown to be more profitable than Oracle Corporation. | |
| Net Sales | $35,622 | $69,943 | |||||||
| Inventory turnover | Cost of Goods Sold | $11,521 | 41.0 | $15,577 | 14.8 | Oracle is more efficient in Inventory management. | |||
| Average Inventory | $281 | times | $1,056 | times | |||||
| Days in inventory | 365 days | 365 | = | 9 | 365 | = | 25 | Oracle holds inventory for a shorter period than Microsoft does. | |
| Inventory turnover | 41.0 | days | 14.8 | days | |||||
| Receivable turnover ratio | Net credit sales | $24,935 | = | 4.1 | $48,960 | = | 3.5 | Assumption: Credit sales is 70% of the net sales. | Oracle is more efficient in receivable management. |
| Average Net Receivables | $6,107 | $14,001 | |||||||
| Average collection period | 365 | 365 | = | 89.4 | 365 | = | 104.4 | Oracle collects its receivables faster than Microsoft does. | |
| Receivable Turnover Ratio | 4.1 | days | 3.5 | days | |||||
| Assets turnover ratio | Net Sales | $35,622 | = | 0.53 | $69,943 | = | 0.72 | Microsoft uses its total assets more efficiently to generate revenues | |
| Average Total Assets | $67,557 | $97,409 | |||||||
| Return on assets ratio | Net Income | $8,547 | = | 12.7% | $23,150 | = | 23.8% | Microsoft generates more profit agaist total assets than Oracle does. | |
| Average Total Assets | $67,557 | $97,409 | |||||||
| Debt to total assets ratio | Total Liabilities | $33,290 | = | 45.3% | $51,621 | = | 47.5% | Oracle has more borrowing capacity than Microsoft. | |
| Total Assets | $73,535 | $108,704 | |||||||
| Times interest earned ratio | Net Income + Int Expense + Tax Expense | $12,219 | = | 15.1 | 28,366 | = | 96.2 | Microsoft is in a more favorable position to cover its fixed obligations. | |
| Interest Expense | $808 | 295 | |||||||
| Payout ratio | Cash dividend declared on common stock | $1,061 | = | 12.4% | $5,180 | = | 22.4% | Microsoft pays more than Oracle does out of its net income. | |
| Net income | $8,547 | $23,150 | |||||||
| Return on common stockholders' equity | Net income - Preferred stock dividend | $8,547 | = | 24.2% | $23,150 | = | 44.8% | Microsoft generates more porfit for their common stockholders. | |
| Average common stockholders' equity | 35,287.00 | $51,629 | |||||||
| Free cash flow | Cash provided by operations minus capital expenditures minus cash dividends paid | $9,703 | = | $9,703 | $19,459 | $19,459 | Microsoft generates more free cash which can be used for acquisition or stock repurchase. | ||
| = | |||||||||
| Current cash debt coverage ratio | Cash provided by operations | $11,214 | = | 0.78 | $26,994 | = | 0.98 | Microsoft maintains higher liquidity to cover its current obligation. | |
| Average current liabilities | $14,442 | $27,461 | |||||||
| Cash debt coverage ratio | Cash provided by operations | $11,214 | = | 0.35 | $26,994 | = | 0.59 | Microsoft maintains higher liquidity to cover its outside obligation. | |
| Average total liabilities | $31,835 | $45,780 | |||||||
| Price/earnings ratio | Stock Price | $34.22 Nafiz Ahamed: Nafiz Ahamed: Price of Oracle Corporation on May 31, 2011 | = | 20 | $26.00 | = | 10 | Microsoft is relatively underpriced and would attract new investors with its lower P/E ratio. | |
| EPS | $1.69 | $ 2.73 | |||||||
Summary
| Summary |
| Liquidity: Oracle Corporation has the better current ratio; with an inventory turnover ratio (41 to 14.8) and accounts receivable turnover ratio (4.1 to 3.5) than that of the Microsoft Corporation. Oracle Corporation has $2.76 in current assets for every dollar in current liabilities while Microsoft Corporation has $2.60 in current assets for every dollar in current liabilities. Microsoft Corporation has the advantage for current cash debt coverage ratio (0.98 to 0.78). |
| Solvency: Microsoft Corporation is in a better financial situation for times interest earned ratio and free cash flow. Microsoft is able to cover their interest expense 96.2 times with income before interest and taxes. However, Oracle can only cover their interest expense 15.1 times with their income before interest and taxes. Microsoft has positive free cash flow of $19,459 million while Oracle has positive free cash flow of $9,703 million. |
| Profitability: Microsoft Corporation definitely has the advantage here since for each of the profitability ratios. Microsoft Corporation has a higher return on common stockholders’ equity (44.8% to 24.2%), a higher gross profit rate (77.7% to 67.7%), a higher profit margin ratio (33.1% to 24.0%) and a lower Price-Earnings ratio (10 to 20). |
| Conclusion: Considering the solvency and profitability ratios Microsoft Corporation is the safer investment. Yet, Oracle Corporation has the better liquidity ratios with exception of the current cash debt coverage ratio. Microsoft has current ratio which shows to be the better of the 2. Therefore, for both the conservative and growth-oriented investors Microsoft Corporation would be the best option based of the reportings. |
Bibliography
| Bibliography |
| Kimmel, P., Weygandt, J., Kieso, D. (2013). Tools for business decisions making. (7th ed). |
| Microsoft Corporation (July 2011), http://www.microsoft.com/investor/SEC/default.aspx?year=2011&filing=annua, retreived Feb, 2014 |
| Oracle Corporation (June 2011) http://www.oracle.com/us/corporate/investor-relations/sec/index.html, retreived Feb, 2014 |