Management Course: Discussion Topic 12
Organizational Change
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
*
15-*
Umpqua Bank’s
Umpqua Bank has become the largest regional community bank in the Pacific Northwest by applying effective organizational change practices
OrganizationalChange
15-*
Lewin’s Force Field Analysis Model
- Developed by Kurt Lewin
- Driving forces
- Push organizations toward change
- External forces or leader’s vision
- Restraining forces
- Resistance to change -- employee behaviors that block the change process
Driving
Forces
Restraining
Forces
*
15-*
Desired
Conditions
Current
Conditions
Before
Change
After
Change
Force Field Analysis Model
During
Change
Driving
Forces
Restraining
Forces
Driving
Forces
Restraining
Forces
Driving
Forces
Restraining
Forces
*
15-*
Not Hoppy About Change
Mina Ishiwatari(front) wanted to improve Hoppy drink’s brand image, but most staff didn’t want to change. “I tried to take a new marketing approach to change the image of Hoppy . . . but no one would listen to me.” She improved Hoppy’s popularity with limited support or budget. Most employees who opposed Ishiwatari’s changes have since left the company.
*
15-*
Restraining Forces (Resistance to Change)
Many forms of resistance
- e.g., complaints, absenteeism, passive noncompliance
View resistance as a resource
Symptoms of deeper problems in the change process
A form of constructive conflict -- may improve decisions in the change process
A form of voice – helps procedural justice
*
15-*
Why People Resist Change
Direct costs
- Losing something of value due to change
Saving face
- Accepting change acknowledges own imperfection, past wrongdoing
Fear of the unknown
- Risk of personal loss
- Concern about being unable to adjust
*
15-*
Why People Resist Change
(con’t)
Breaking routines
- Organizational unlearning is part of change process
- But past practices/habits are valued by employees due to comfort, low cognitive effort
Incongruent organizational systems
- Systems/structures reinforce status quo
- Career, reward, power, communication systems
Incongruent team dynamics
- Norms contrary to desired change
*
15-*
Creating an Urgency for Change
- Inform employees about driving forces
- Most difficult when organization is doing well
- Customer-driven change
- Adverse consequences for firm
- Human element energizes employees
- Sometimes need to create urgency to change without external drivers
- Requires persuasive influence
- Use positive vision rather than threats
*
15-*
Minimizing Resistance to Change
Highest priority and first strategy for change
Improves urgency to change
Reduces uncertainty (fear of unknown)
Problems -- time consuming and costly
Communication
Learning
Involvement
Stress Mgt
Coercion
Negotiation
*
15-*
Minimizing Resistance to Change
Provides new knowledge/skills
Includes coaching and other forms of learning
Helps break old routines and adopt new roles
Problems -- potentially time consuming and costly
Communication
Involvement
Stress Mgt
Coercion
Negotiation
Learning
*
15-*
Minimizing Resistance to Change
- Employees participate in change process
- Helps saving face and reducing fear of unknown
- Includes task forces, future search events
- Problems -- time-consuming, potential conflict
Learning
Involvement
Stress Mgt
Coercion
Negotiation
Involvement
Communication
*
15-*
Minimizing Resistance to Change
When communication, learning, and involvement are not enough to minimize stress
Potential benefits
- More motivation to change
- Less fear of unknown
- Fewer direct costs
Problems -- time-consuming, expensive, doesn’t help everyone
Learning
Involvement
Coercion
Negotiation
Stress Mgt
Communication
*
15-*
Minimizing Resistance to Change
- Influence by exchange -- reduces direct costs
- May be necessary when people clearly lose something and won’t otherwise support change
- Problems
- Expensive
- Gains compliance, not commitment
Learning
Involvement
Stress Mgt
Coercion
Communication
Negotiation
*
15-*
Minimizing Resistance to Change
When all else fails
Assertive influence
Radical form of “unlearning”
Problems
- Reduces trust
- May create more subtle resistance
- Encourage politics to protect job
Coercion
Learning
Involvement
Communication
Stress Mgt
Negotiation
*
15-*
Refreezing the Desired Conditions
“When you are leading for growth, you know you are going to disrupt comfortable routines and ask for new behavior, new priorities, new skills… Even when we want to change, and do change, we tend to relax and the rubber band snaps us back into our comfort zones.”
Ray Davis, CEO, Umpqua Bank
15-*
Refreezing the Desired Conditions
- Realigning organizational systems and team dynamics with the desired changes
- Alter rewards to reinforce new behaviors
- Change career paths
- Revise information systems
*
15-*
Change Agents
- Change agent -- anyone who possesses enough knowledge and power to guide and facilitate the change effort
- Engage in transformational leadership
- Develop the change vision
- Communicate the vision
- Act consistently with the vision
- Build commitment to the vision
*
15-*
Strategic Vision & Change
- Need a vision of the desired future state
- Identifies critical success factors for change
- Minimizes employee fear of the unknown
- Clarifies role perceptions
*
15-*
Diffusion of Change
- Begin change as pilot projects
- Effective diffusion considers MARS model
- Motivation – pilot project is successful, reward diffusion of pilot project
- Ability – Train employees to adopt pilot project
- Role perceptions –Translate pilot project to new situations
- Situational factors – Provide resources to implement pilot project elsewhere
15-*
Action Research Approach
- Action orientation and research orientation
- Action – to achieve the goal of change
- Research – testing application of concepts
- Action research principles
Open systems perspective
Highly participative process
Data-driven, problem-oriented process
*
15-*
Form
client-
consultant
relations
Disengage
consultant’s
services
Action Research Process
Diagnose
need for
change
Introduce
intervention
Evaluate/
stabilize
change
*
15-*
BBC Takes the Appreciative Journey
To become a more creative organization, the British Broadcasting Company sponsored an appreciative inquiry process of employee consultation, called Just Imagine. “It gave me a powerful mandate for change,” said BBC’s chief executive at the time.
*
15-*
Appreciative Inquiry Approach
- Frames change around positive and possible future, rather than traditional problem focus.
- Application of positive organizational behavior
*
15-*
Four-D Model of Appreciative Inquiry
Designing
Engaging in dialogue about “what should be”
Dreaming
Forming ideas about “what might be”
Discovery
Discovering the best of “what is
Delivering
Developing objectives about “what will be”
*
15-*
Large Group Interventions
- Future search, open space, and other interventions that involve “the whole system”
- Large group sessions
- May last a few days
- High involvement with minimal structure
- Limitations of large group interventions
- Limited opportunity to contribute
- Risk that a few people will dominate
- Focus on common ground may hide differences
- Generates high expectations about ideal future
15-*
Parallel Learning Structure Approach
- Highly participative social structures
- Members representative across the formal hierarchy
- Sufficiently free from firm’s constraints
- Develop solutions for organizational change which are then applied back into the larger organization
*
15-*
Organization
Parallel
Structure
Parallel Learning Structures
*
15-*
Cross-Cultural and Ethical Concerns
- Cross-Cultural Concerns
- Linear and open conflict assumptions different from values in some cultures
- Ethical Concerns
- Privacy rights of individuals
- Management power
- Individuals’ self-esteem
*
15-*
Organizations are About People
“Take away my people, but leave my factories, and soon grass will grow on the factory floors. Take away my factories, but leave my people, and soon we will have a new and better factory.”
Andrew Carnegie (1835-1919)
Source: Library of Congress
*
Discussion of
Activity 15.3
Strategic Change Incidents
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
15-*
Scenario #1: “Greener Telco”
- Scenario #1 refers to Bell Canada’s Zero Waste program, which successfully changed employee behaviorby altering the causes of thosebehaviors.
- Pilot project in Toronto – 12 floor building of 1000 staff reduced waste from 1800 lb per day to just 75 lb per day within 3 years.
Courtesy of Bell Canada
*
15-*
Bell Canada’s Change Strategy
Relied on the MARS model to alter behavior:
- Motivation -- employee involvement, respected steering committee (photo)
- Ability -- taught paper reduction, email, food disposal
- Role perceptions – learned importance of reducing waste
- Situation -- created barriers to wasteful behavior, eg. removed garbage bins
Courtesy of Bell Canada
*
15-*
Scenario #2: “Go Forward Airline”
- Scenario #2 refers to Continental Airline’s “Go Forward” change strategy, which catapulted the company “from worst to first” within a couple of years.
15-*
Continental Airlines’ Change Strategy
Communicate, communicate, communicate
Introduced 15 performance measures
Established stretch goals (repainting planes in 6 months)
Replaced 50 of 61 executives
Rewarded new goals (on-time arrival, stock price)
Customers as drivers of change
Organizational Change
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
McShane/Von Glinow OB 5e
Copyright © 2010 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
*