The Harvard Business Review presents a story about Peachtree
individual written assignment grading rubric – week 4
Peachtree Healthcare Paper
Content/Development
|
Subject Matter · Key elements of assignments covered · 1,050-1,750 words in length · Discusses what you would recommend to Peachtree to solve their IT problems as if you were hired as a consultant. Support your recommendations with references and outside citations · Discusses how your opinions about what should be done differ before you read the commentaries, and after you read them · Compares and contrasts each commentator opinion and discuss key leadership implications from each · Discusses which of the commentators’ opinions resonated and made the most sense to you and why · Discusses which parts of the recommendations you will use, and which parts of your recommendation are unique · Provides a full explanation of what you would recommend and why · Content is comprehensive/accurate/persuasive · Displays an understanding of relevant theory · Major points supported by specific details/examples · Research is adequate/timely · Writer has gone beyond textbook for resources |
10 Points |
|
Higher-Order Thinking · Writer compares/contrasts/integrates theory/subject matter with work environment/experience · At an appropriate level, the writer analyzes and synthesizes theory/practice to develop new ideas and ways of conceptualizing and performing
|
|
Organization
|
Organization · The introduction provides a sufficient background on the topic and previews major points · Central theme/purpose is immediately clear · Structure is clear, logical, and easy to follow · Subsequent sections develop/support the central theme · Conclusion/recommendations follow logically from the body of the paper
|
2 Points |
Style/Mechanics
|
Format · Citations/reference page follow guidelines · Properly cites ideas/info from other sources · Paper is laid out effectively--uses, heading and other reader-friendly tools · Paper is neat/shows attention to detail
Grammar/Punctuation/Spelling · Rules of grammar, usage, punctuation are followed · Spelling is correct Readability/Style · Sentences are complete, clear, and concise · Sentences are well-constructed with consistently strong, varied structure · Transitions between sentences/paragraphs/sections help maintain the flow of thought · Words used are precise and unambiguous · The tone is appropriate to the audience, content, and assignment
|
2 Points |
|
Possible Late Penalty |
10% / day |
|
Possible Points Earned |
14 |