Project Risk Analysis -Sensitivity Analysis
CB_DATA_
Problem 3-1
| PROBLEM 3-1: Clayton Manufacturing Company | |||||||
| Given | Solution Legend | ||||||
| EBITDA (Year 1) | $ 200,000 | = Value given in problem | |||||
| Growth Rate in EBITDA | 5% | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | |||||
| Initial investment | $ 800,000 | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||||
| Depreciation (Straight line) over | 5 | years | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | ||||
| Estimated salvage value | $ - | = Crystal Ball Input | |||||
| Tax rate | 35% | = Crystal Ball Output | |||||
| Cost of capital | 12% | ||||||
| Solution | |||||||
| Years | |||||||
| a. | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| EBITDA | $ 200,000 | ||||||
| Less: Depreciation Expense | |||||||
| EBIT | |||||||
| Less: Taxes | |||||||
| NOPAT | |||||||
| Plus: Depreciation Expense | |||||||
| Less: CAPEX | - | - | - | - | |||
| Less: Change in Working Capital | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
| Project FCF | |||||||
| b. | |||||||
| NPV | |||||||
| c. | |||||||
| Using "Goal Seek" to solve for the EBITDA in year 1 (C5) that yields a NPV of 0 (C28). | |||||||
| Breakeven Year 1 EBITDA |
Problem 3-2
| PROBLEM 3-2: Breakeven Sensitivity Analysis | ||||||||||
| Given | Solution Legend | |||||||||
| Investment (enter with "-" sign) | $ (4,000,000) | = Value given in problem | ||||||||
| Plant life | 5 | Years | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | |||||||
| Salvage value | $ 400,000 | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | ||||||||
| Variable Cost % | 45% | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | ||||||||
| Fixed operating cost | $ 1,000,000 | = Crystal Ball Input | ||||||||
| Tax rate | 38% | = Crystal Ball Output | ||||||||
| Working capital | 10% | (Percent of the expected change in revenues for the year) | ||||||||
| Required Rate of Return | 15% | |||||||||
| Sales volume multiple | 1.00 | |||||||||
| Year | ||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
| Sales volume | $ 1,000,000 | $ 1,500,000 | $ 3,000,000 | $ 3,500,000 | $ 2,000,000 | |||||
| Unit price | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.50 | 2.50 | 2.50 | |||||
| Revenues | 2,000,000 | 3,000,000 | 7,500,000 | 8,750,000 | 5,000,000 | |||||
| Variable Operating Costs | (900,000) | (1,350,000) | (3,375,000) | (3,937,500) | (2,250,000) | |||||
| Fixed Operating Costs | (1,000,000) | (1,000,000) | (1,000,000) | (1,000,000) | (1,000,000) | |||||
| Depreciation Expense | (800,000) | (800,000) | (800,000) | (800,000) | (800,000) | |||||
| Net Operating Income | $ (700,000) | $ (150,000) | $ 2,325,000 | $ 3,012,500 | $ 950,000 | |||||
| Less: Taxes | 266,000 | 57,000 | (883,500) | (1,144,750) | (361,000) | |||||
| NOPAT | $ (434,000) | $ (93,000) | $ 1,441,500 | $ 1,867,750 | $ 589,000 | |||||
| Plus: Depreciation | 800,000 | 800,000 | 800,000 | 800,000 | 800,000 | |||||
| Less: CAPEX | (4,000,000) | - | - | - | - | 248,000 | ||||
| Less: Working Capital | (200,000) | (100,000) | (450,000) | (125,000) | 375,000 | 500,000 | ||||
| Free Cash Flow | $ (4,200,000) | $ 266,000 | $ 257,000 | $ 2,116,500 | $ 3,042,750 | $ 2,137,000 | ||||
| NPV | $ 419,435 | |||||||||
| IRR | 18% | |||||||||
| Equivalent Annual Cost | $ 125,124 | |||||||||
| Solution | ||||||||||
| a. What are the key sources of risk that you see in this project? | ||||||||||
| b. Breakeven sensitivity analysis | ||||||||||
| Estimated Value | Breakeven Value | Percent Difference | ||||||||
| Variable | ||||||||||
| Initial Capex | ||||||||||
| Variable Cost as a % of Sales | 49% | |||||||||
| Working Capital % of new Sales | 27% | |||||||||
| Sales volume multiplier | 1 | 0.92 | ||||||||
| c. Discuss results of part b. | ||||||||||
| d. Should you always seek to reduce project risk? |
Problem 3-3ab
| PROBLEM 3-3ab: Bridgeway Pharmaceuticals | ||||||||||
| Given | Solution Legend | |||||||||
| Investment cost (today) | $ (400,000) | = Value given in problem | ||||||||
| Project life | 5 | years | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | |||||||
| Depreciation expense | $ 80,000 | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | ||||||||
| Waste disposal cost savings per year | $ 18,000 | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | ||||||||
| Labor cost savings per year | $ 40,000 | = Crystal Ball Input | ||||||||
| Sale of reclaimed waste | $ 200,000 | = Crystal Ball Output | ||||||||
| Required rate of return | 20% | |||||||||
| Tax rate | 35% | |||||||||
| Solution | ||||||||||
| Part a. | Year | |||||||||
| Cash flow estimation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||||
| Investment | $ (400,000) | |||||||||
| Waste disposal cost savings per year | ||||||||||
| Labor cost savings per year | ||||||||||
| Proceeds from sale of reclaimed waste materials | ||||||||||
| EBITDA | ||||||||||
| Less: Depreciation | ||||||||||
| Additional EBIT | ||||||||||
| Less: Taxes | ||||||||||
| NOPAT | ||||||||||
| Plus: Depreciation | ||||||||||
| Less: Capex | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
| Less: Additional working capital | - | - | - | - | - | |||||
| FCF | ||||||||||
| NPV | ||||||||||
| IRR | ||||||||||
| Analysis | ||||||||||
| b. | ||||||||||
| If sale of reclaimed waste drops in half, NPV | ||||||||||
| Critical B-E for sale of waste materials | ||||||||||
| Critical B-E Price decline in salvage materials | ||||||||||
| c. See next worksheet |
The terminal period growth rates were estimated such that the intrinsic valuation of the firm's equity would equal the current market capitalization of the firm using the "Goal Seek" function.
To answer part b. simply substitute $100,000 for the sale of reclaimed waste in C10.
Solver has been used to find this answer. Details given in text box above.
Problem 3-3c
| PROBLEM 3-3c: Bridgeway Pharmaceuticals | |||||||
| Given | Solution Legend | ||||||
| Investment cost (today) | $ (400,000) | = Value given in problem | |||||
| Project life | 5 | years | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | ||||
| Depreciation expense | $ 80,000 | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||||
| Waste disposal cost savings per year | $ 18,000 | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | |||||
| Labor cost savings per year | $ 40,000 | = Crystal Ball Input | |||||
| Sale of reclaimed waste | $ 200,000 | = Crystal Ball Output | |||||
| Required rate of return | 20% | ||||||
| Tax rate | 35% | ||||||
| Correlation (Year to year) in Proceeds from reclaimed waste | 0.90 | ||||||
| Solution | |||||||
| c. | Year | ||||||
| Cash flow estimation | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
| Investment | |||||||
| Waste disposal cost savings per year | |||||||
| Labor cost savings per year | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | 40,000 | ||
| Proceeds from sale of reclaimed waste | |||||||
| EBITDA | |||||||
| Less: Depreciation | |||||||
| Additional EBIT | |||||||
| Less: Taxes | |||||||
| NOPAT | |||||||
| Plus: Depreciation | |||||||
| Less: Capex | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | ||
| Less: Additional working capital | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | ||
| FCF | |||||||
| NPV | |||||||
| IRR | |||||||
| Part i. | |||||||
| Part ii. | |||||||
| Part iii. |
Note: Your results from the simulation experiment will differ slightly from those reported here where you did not use the same "seed" value for the random number generator. In fact, if you do not "fix" the same seed value for each simulation your results will differ slightly from one simulation of the same problem to another (see Run Preferences/Sampling).
Problem 3-4
| PROBLEM 3-4: TitMar Motor Company | ||||||||||
| Given | Solution Legend | |||||||||
| Assumptions and Predictions | Estimates | = Value given in problem | ||||||||
| Price per unit | $ 4,895 | Part a. Substitute 5% for market share (%) . | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | |||||||
| Market share (%) | 15.00% | Part b. Substitute $4,500 for the price per unit. | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||||||
| Market size (Year 1) | $ 200,000 | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | ||||||||
| Growth rate in market size beginning in Year 2 | 5.00% | = Crystal Ball Input | ||||||||
| Unit variable cost | $ 4,250 | = Crystal Ball Output | ||||||||
| Fixed cost | $ 9,000,000 | |||||||||
| Tax rate | 50.00% | |||||||||
| Cost of capital | 18.00% | |||||||||
| Investment in NWC | 5.00% | of the predicted change in firm revenues. | ||||||||
| Initial investment in PP&E | $ 7,000,000 | |||||||||
| Depreciation (5 year life w/no salvage) | $ 1,400,000 | |||||||||
| Solution | ||||||||||
| Year | ||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |||||
| Investment | $ (7,000,000) | |||||||||
| Revenue | 146,850,000 | 154,192,500 | 161,902,125 | 169,997,231 | 178,497,093 | |||||
| Variable Cost | (127,500,000) | (133,875,000) | (140,568,750) | (147,597,188) | (154,977,047) | |||||
| Fixed cost | (9,000,000) | (9,000,000) | (9,000,000) | (9,000,000) | (9,000,000) | |||||
| Depreciation | (1,400,000) | (1,400,000) | (1,400,000) | (1,400,000) | (1,400,000) | |||||
| EBT(Net Operating Income) | $ 8,950,000 | $ 9,917,500 | $ 10,933,375 | $ 12,000,044 | $ 13,120,046 | |||||
| Tax | (4,475,000) | (4,958,750) | (5,466,688) | (6,000,022) | (6,560,023) | |||||
| Net Operating Profit after Tax (NOPAT) | $ 4,475,000 | $ 4,958,750 | $ 5,466,688 | $ 6,000,022 | $ 6,560,023 | |||||
| Plus: Depreciation expense | 1,400,000 | 1,400,000 | 1,400,000 | 1,400,000 | 1,400,000 | |||||
| Less: Capex | (7,000,000) | - | - | - | - | - | ||||
| Less: Change in NWC | (7,342,500) | (367,125) | (385,481) | (404,755) | (424,993) | 8,924,855 | ||||
| Free Cash Flow | $ (14,342,500) | $ 5,507,875 | $ 5,973,269 | $ 6,461,932 | $ 6,975,029 | $ 16,884,878 | ||||
| Net Present Value | $ 9,526,209 | |||||||||
| Internal Rate of Return | 39.82% | |||||||||
| Units Sold | 30,000 | 31,500 | 33,075 | 34,729 | 36,465 | |||||
| a. If the market share is only 5% then the project's NPV = | ||||||||||
| b. If market share = 15% and the price of the PTV falls to $4,500 the NPV = | ||||||||||
| Breakeven Sensitivity Analysis | Critical % Change | Critical Value | ||||||||
| Price per unit | ||||||||||
| Market share (%) | ||||||||||
| Market size (Year 1) | ||||||||||
| Growth rate in market size beginning in Year 2 | ||||||||||
| Unit variable cost | ||||||||||
| Fixed cost | ||||||||||
| Tax rate | ||||||||||
| Cost of capital | ||||||||||
| Investment in NWC | ||||||||||
| Analysis: |
Problem 3-5
| PROBLEM 3-5: TitMar Motor Company | |||||||
| Given | Solution Legend | ||||||
| Assumptions and Predictions | Estimates | = Value given in problem | |||||
| Price per unit | $ 4,895 | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | |||||
| Market share (%) | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | ||||||
| Market size (Year 1) | 200,000 | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | |||||
| Growth rate in market size beginning in Year 2 | 5.00% | = Crystal Ball Input | |||||
| Unit variable cost | $ 4,250 | = Crystal Ball Output | |||||
| Fixed cost | $ 9,000,000 | ||||||
| Tax rate | 50.0% | ||||||
| Cost of capital | 18.00% | ||||||
| Investment in NWC | 5.00% | of the predicted change in firm revenues. | |||||
| Initial investment in pp&e | $ 7,000,000 | ||||||
| Depreciation (5 year life w/no salvage) | $ 1,400,000 | ||||||
| Solution | |||||||
| Year | |||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| Investment | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | - 0 | ||
| Growth rate in market size | |||||||
| Market Size (total PTV sold) | |||||||
| Market Share (units sold by Titmar) | |||||||
| Revenue | |||||||
| Variable Cost | |||||||
| Fixed cost | |||||||
| Depreciation | |||||||
| EBT(Net Operating Income) | |||||||
| Tax | |||||||
| Net Operating Profit after Tax (NOPAT) | |||||||
| Plus: Depreciation expense | |||||||
| Less: Capex | |||||||
| Less: Change in NWC | |||||||
| Free Cash Flow | |||||||
| Net Present Value | |||||||
| Internal Rate of Return |
Problem 3-6
| PROBLEM 3-6: Biolizer Problem--Decision Tree | ||||||||||
| Given | ||||||||||
| EPA after-tax cost | $ 80,000 | |||||||||
| Abandonment Value | $ 350,000 | |||||||||
| Probability of Good EPA Ruling | 80% | |||||||||
| Solution | Solution Legend | |||||||||
| Panel a. No Option to Abandon | = Value given in problem | |||||||||
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | ||||
| Favorable EPA Ruling--Expected Project FCFs | $ (580,000) | $ 87,600 | $ 78,420 | $ 93,320 | $ 109,710 | $ 658,770 | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||
| NPV (Favorable EPA Ruling) = | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | |||||||||
| = Crystal Ball Input | ||||||||||
| Unfavorable EPA Ruling--Expected FCFs | = Crystal Ball Output | |||||||||
| NPV (Unfavorable EPA Ruling) | ||||||||||
| Revised Expected Project FCFs | ||||||||||
| E[NPV] with No Option to Abandon | ||||||||||
| Panel b. Option to Abandon | ||||||||||
| 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 | |||||
| Project Not Abandoned (Favorable EPA) | ||||||||||
| NPV (Favorable EPA Ruling) = | ||||||||||
| Project Abandoned (Unfavorable EPA) | $ - | $ - | $ - | $ - | ||||||
| NPV (Unfavorable EPA Ruling) | ||||||||||
| Revised Expected Project FCFs | ||||||||||
| E[NPV] with the Option to Abandon | ||||||||||
| Analysis: |
Problem 3-7
| PROBLEM 3-7: Introductory Simulation Analysis Exercises | |||||
| a. Jason Enterprises | |||||
| Given | Solution Legend | ||||
| Operating Earnings/Sales | 25% | = Value given in problem | |||
| Sales (upper limit) | $ 10,000,000 | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | |||
| Sales (lower limit) | $ 7,000,000 | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||
| = Goal Seek or Solver cell | |||||
| Solution | = Crystal Ball Input | ||||
| Forecasted Sales | = Crystal Ball Output | ||||
| Operating Earnings | |||||
| b. Aggiebear Dog Snacks, Inc. | |||||
| Given | |||||
| Revenues | Minimum | $ 18,000,000 | |||
| Most likely | $ 25,000,000 | ||||
| Maximum | $ 35,000,000 | ||||
| Cost of Goods sold/Revenues | Minimum | 70% | |||
| Maximum | 80% | ||||
| Solution | |||||
| Forecasted Sales | |||||
| Cost of Goods Sold/Sales | |||||
| Part i-iii. | |||||
| Sales | |||||
| Less: Cost of Goods Sold | |||||
| Operating Earnings |
Solution 3-8
| PROBLEM 3-8: Rayner Aeronautics | |||||
| Given | Solution Legend | ||||
| Investment Outlay (Year 0) | $ 12,500,000 | = Value given in problem | |||
| Year 1 Expected Cash Flow | $ 2,000,000 | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | |||
| Required Rate of Return | 18% | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||
| = Goal Seek or Solver cell | |||||
| = Crystal Ball Input | |||||
| = Crystal Ball Output | |||||
| Solution | |||||
| a. | |||||
| Break-Even Growth Rate in Cash flows | |||||
| Year | Growth Rate | Cash Flows | |||
| 0 | NPV = | ||||
| 1 | 0 | ||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| b. | |||||
| Simulation Model | |||||
| Variable | Mean | Std. Deviation | |||
| Year 1 cash flow | Normal distribution | ||||
| Annual Growth Rates | Triangular Distrbution | ||||
| Year | Most likely | Minimum | Maximum | ||
| 2 | 40.00% | 20.00% | 80.00% | ||
| 3 | 40.00% | 10.00% | 160.00% | ||
| 4 | 40.00% | 5.00% | 320.00% | ||
| 5 | 40.00% | 2.50% | 640.00% | ||
| Year | Growth Rate | Cash Flows | |||
| 0 | |||||
| 1 | |||||
| 2 | |||||
| 3 | |||||
| 4 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| c. | |||||
| Results of Simulation | |||||
| NPV | |||||
| IRR | |||||
| Expected NPV | see mean value in chart below | ||||
| Expected IRR | see mean value in chart below |
Problem 3-9
| PROBLEM 3-9: ConocoPhillips Natural Gas Wellhead Project | |||||||||||||||
| Given | |||||||||||||||
| ConocoPhillips's Cost of Capital for project | 15.00% | ||||||||||||||
| Project life | 10 years | ||||||||||||||
| Solution | Solution Legend | ||||||||||||||
| 1. | Years | = Value given in problem | |||||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | ||||
| Investment | $ 1,200,000 | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||||||||||||
| Increase in NWC | 145,000 | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | |||||||||||||
| MACRS Depr Rate (7 year) | 0.1429 | 0.2449 | 0.1749 | 0.1249 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 | 0.0893 | 0.0445 | = Crystal Ball Input | ||||||
| Natural Gas Wellhead Price (per MCF) | 6 | = Crystal Ball Output | |||||||||||||
| Volume (MCF/day) | 900 | ||||||||||||||
| Days per year | 365 | ||||||||||||||
| Fee to Producer of Natural Gas | $3.00 | ||||||||||||||
| Compression & processing costs (per MCF) | 0.65 | ||||||||||||||
| Cash Flow Calculations | |||||||||||||||
| Natural Gas Wellhead Price Revenue | |||||||||||||||
| Lease fee expense | |||||||||||||||
| Compression & processing costs | |||||||||||||||
| Depreciation expense | |||||||||||||||
| Net operating Profit | |||||||||||||||
| Less: Taxes (40%) | |||||||||||||||
| Net operating profit after tax (NOPAT) | |||||||||||||||
| Plus: Depreciation expense | |||||||||||||||
| Return of net working capital | |||||||||||||||
| Project Free Cash Flow | |||||||||||||||
| NPV | |||||||||||||||
| IRR | |||||||||||||||
| 2a-c. Scenario Summary | |||||||||||||||
| Current Values | Best Case | Most Likely Case | Worst Case | ||||||||||||
| Changing Cells | |||||||||||||||
| NG Price | 6 | 8 | 6 | 3 | |||||||||||
| Production Rate | 900 | 1200 | 900 | 700 | |||||||||||
| Result Cells | |||||||||||||||
| NPV | |||||||||||||||
| IRR | |||||||||||||||
| Notes: Current Values column represents values of changing cells at time Scenario Summary Report was created. | |||||||||||||||
| 3. Breakeven Sensitivity Analsyis Students should use Goal Seek in Excel to answer this question. | |||||||||||||||
| a. | |||||||||||||||
| Breakeven nautral gas price for an NPV = 0 | |||||||||||||||
| b. | |||||||||||||||
| Breakeven natural gas volume in Year 1 for an NPV = 0 | |||||||||||||||
| c. | |||||||||||||||
| Breakeven investment for an NPV = 0 | |||||||||||||||
| 4. Student answers will vary but most will probably recommend the project. |
Problem 3-10
| PROBLEM 3-10: Blended Profile Applied, per Aircraft B737-700 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Given | Solution Legend | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Purchase Cost (pre-installed) $000 | $ (700,000) | Airframe Maintenance Cost | $ (2,100) | per year | = Value given in problem | |||||||||||||||||
| Installation $000 | $ (56,000) | Useful Life (yrs) Average | 20 | = Formula/Calculation/Analysis required | ||||||||||||||||||
| Downtime Days (installation) | 1 | Runway Savings | $ 500 | per year | = Qualitative analysis or Short answer required | |||||||||||||||||
| Downtime Cost/Day $000 | $ (5,000) | Facility cost | $ 1,200 | per aricraft | = Goal Seek or Solver cell | |||||||||||||||||
| Salvage % | 15.00% | Depreciation | MACRS (see below) | = Crystal Ball Input | ||||||||||||||||||
| Gen. Escalation | 3.00% | Fuel Price (all-in) | $ 0.80 | includes delivery, taxes and into plane charges | = Crystal Ball Output | |||||||||||||||||
| Marginal Tax Rate | 39.00% | Fuel (gallons saved) | 178,500 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Discount Rate | 9.28% | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Solution | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Year | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | ||
| Winglet Purchase | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Winglet Installation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Install. Downtime costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Airport Reconfiguration | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel Savings | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Airframe Maint. Costs | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Reduced restrictions (inflated 3%/yr) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| EBIT | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Less: Income Tax | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Net Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Plus: Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operating Cash Flow | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Salvage Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Tax on Salvage Value | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Total Project Cash Flow | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| b. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NPV | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IRR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| MIRR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| DEPRECIATION DETAILS | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| MACRS Table | Normal Table | Normal Table x | Year 1(a) Additional | valid til 9/11/04 | ||||||||||||||||||
| 50.00% | 50.00% | Total (modified table) | Tax Depr | |||||||||||||||||||
| 1 | 14.29% | 7.15% | 50.00% | 57.15% | ||||||||||||||||||
| 2 | 24.49% | 12.25% | 12.25% | |||||||||||||||||||
| 3 | 17.49% | 8.75% | 8.75% | |||||||||||||||||||
| 4 | 12.49% | 6.25% | 6.25% | |||||||||||||||||||
| 5 | 8.93% | 4.47% | 4.47% | |||||||||||||||||||
| 6 | 8.92% | 4.46% | 4.46% | |||||||||||||||||||
| 7 | 8.93% | 4.47% | 4.47% | |||||||||||||||||||
| 8 | 4.46% | 2.23% | 2.23% | |||||||||||||||||||
| (a) Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| c. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Breakeven fuel cost | per gallon | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Breakeven fuel savings | gallons | |||||||||||||||||||||
| d. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Current Values | Best Case | Worst Case | ||||||||||||||||||||
| Changing Cells | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel Price | $ 0.80 | $ 1.10 | $ 0.50 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Gallons Saved | 178,500 | 214,000 | 142,000 | |||||||||||||||||||
| Result Cells | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NPV | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IRR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| MIRR | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Notes: Current Values column represents values of changing cells at time Scenario Summary Report was created. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| e. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| f. Impact on NPV and IRR if winglets have no salvage value. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NPV | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| IRR |