The Challenges and Benefits to the Proposal

kelinc

rubric_detail_soc.htm

Home >Social Science homework help >The Challenges and Benefits to the Proposal

Current Location

Rubric Detail

Skip to Course Menu Skip to Top Frame Tabs

You can interact with a rubric to grade in Grid View or List View. More Help

Content

Name: SOC400 Week 8 Assignment 3: The Challenges and Benefits to the Proposal

Description: SOC400 Week 8 Assignment 3: The Challenges and Benefits to the Proposal

	Unacceptable Below 60% F	Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D	Fair 70-79% C	Proficient 80-89% B	Exemplary 90-100% A
SOC400-A3-1 1. Revise Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Weight: 10%	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 8.39 (5.99%) Did not submit or incompletely revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 8.4 (6%) - 9.79 (6.99%) Insufficiently revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 9.8 (7%) - 11.19 (7.99%) Partially revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 11.2 (8%) - 12.59 (8.99%) Satisfactorily revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12.6 (9%) - 14 (10%) Thoroughly revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback:
SOC400-A3-2 2. Analyze two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Weight: 25%	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20.99 (14.99%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (15%) - 24.49 (17.49%) Insufficiently analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24.5 (17.5%) - 27.99 (19.99%) Partially analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 28 (20%) - 31.49 (22.49%) Satisfactorily analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 31.5 (22.5%) - 35 (25%) Thoroughly analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Feedback:
SOC400-A3-3 3. Provide a logical response to each of the challenges. Weight: 15%	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 12.59 (8.99%) Did not submit or incompletely provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12.6 (9%) - 14.69 (10.49%) Insufficiently provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 14.7 (10.5%) - 16.79 (11.99%) Partially provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 16.8 (12%) - 18.89 (13.49%) Satisfactorily provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 18.9 (13.5%) - 21 (15%) Thoroughly provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Feedback:
SOC400-A3-4 4. Analyze two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Weight: 25%	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 20.99 (14.99%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 21 (15%) - 24.49 (17.49%) Insufficiently analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 24.5 (17.5%) - 27.99 (19.99%) Partially analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 28 (20%) - 31.49 (22.49%) Satisfactorily analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 31.5 (22.5%) - 35 (25%) Thoroughly analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Feedback:
SOC400-A3-5 5. Provide a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Weight: 10%	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 8.39 (5.99%) Did not submit or incompletely provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 8.4 (6%) - 9.79 (6.99%) Insufficiently provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 9.8 (7%) - 11.19 (7.99%) Partially provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 11.2 (8%) - 12.59 (8.99%) Satisfactorily provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12.6 (9%) - 14 (10%) Thoroughly provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Feedback:
SOC400-A3-6 6. Include five to seven (5-7) credible and reliable references in addition to the textbook. Weight: 5%	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 4.19 (2.99%) No references provided Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4.2 (3%) - 4.89 (3.49%) Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 4.9 (3.5%) - 5.59 (3.99%) Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 5.6 (4%) - 6.29 (4.49%) Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 6.3 (4.5%) - 7 (5%) Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. Feedback:
SOC400-A3-7 7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%	Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) - 8.39 (5.99%) More than 8 errors present Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 8.4 (6%) - 9.79 (6.99%) 7-8 errors present Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 9.8 (7%) - 11.19 (7.99%) 5-6 errors present Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 11.2 (8%) - 12.59 (8.99%) 3-4 errors present Feedback:	Points: Points Range: 12.6 (9%) - 14 (10%) 0-2 errors present Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

SOC400-A3-1 1. Revise Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Weight: 10%--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 8.39 (5.99%) Did not submit or incompletely revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 8.4 (6%) - 9.79 (6.99%) Insufficiently revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Fair 70-79% C 9.8 (7%) - 11.19 (7.99%) Partially revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Proficient 80-89% B 11.2 (8%) - 12.59 (8.99%) Satisfactorily revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Exemplary 90-100% A 12.6 (9%) - 14 (10%) Thoroughly revised Part I based on your professor’s feedback. Feedback:

SOC400-A3-2 2. Analyze two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Weight: 25%--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 20.99 (14.99%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 21 (15%) - 24.49 (17.49%) Insufficiently analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Fair 70-79% C 24.5 (17.5%) - 27.99 (19.99%) Partially analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Proficient 80-89% B 28 (20%) - 31.49 (22.49%) Satisfactorily analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Exemplary 90-100% A 31.5 (22.5%) - 35 (25%) Thoroughly analyzed two to three (2-3) likely challenges (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) to achieving the proposed change(s). Feedback:

SOC400-A3-3 3. Provide a logical response to each of the challenges. Weight: 15%--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 12.59 (8.99%) Did not submit or incompletely provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 12.6 (9%) - 14.69 (10.49%) Insufficiently provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Fair 70-79% C 14.7 (10.5%) - 16.79 (11.99%) Partially provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Proficient 80-89% B 16.8 (12%) - 18.89 (13.49%) Satisfactorily provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Exemplary 90-100% A 18.9 (13.5%) - 21 (15%) Thoroughly provided a logical response to each of the challenges. Feedback:

SOC400-A3-4 4. Analyze two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Weight: 25%--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 20.99 (14.99%) Did not submit or incompletely analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 21 (15%) - 24.49 (17.49%) Insufficiently analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Fair 70-79% C 24.5 (17.5%) - 27.99 (19.99%) Partially analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Proficient 80-89% B 28 (20%) - 31.49 (22.49%) Satisfactorily analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Exemplary 90-100% A 31.5 (22.5%) - 35 (25%) Thoroughly analyzed two to three (2-3) possible benefits (economic, social, political, legal, etc.) that could be realized following the proposed change(s). Feedback:

SOC400-A3-5 5. Provide a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Weight: 10%--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 8.39 (5.99%) Did not submit or incompletely provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 8.4 (6%) - 9.79 (6.99%) Insufficiently provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Fair 70-79% C 9.8 (7%) - 11.19 (7.99%) Partially provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Proficient 80-89% B 11.2 (8%) - 12.59 (8.99%) Satisfactorily provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Exemplary 90-100% A 12.6 (9%) - 14 (10%) Thoroughly provided a summary of the articles you have written that includes a quote, question, and / or statistic along with a call for readers to respond by taking some specific action. Feedback:

SOC400-A3-6 6. Include five to seven (5-7) credible and reliable references in addition to the textbook. Weight: 5%--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 4.19 (2.99%) No references provided Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 4.2 (3%) - 4.89 (3.49%) Does not meet the required number of references; all references poor quality choices. Fair 70-79% C 4.9 (3.5%) - 5.59 (3.99%) Does not meet the required number of references; some references poor quality choices. Proficient 80-89% B 5.6 (4%) - 6.29 (4.49%) Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. Exemplary 90-100% A 6.3 (4.5%) - 7 (5%) Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. Feedback:

SOC400-A3-7 7. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements Weight: 10%--

Levels of Achievement: Unacceptable Below 60% F 0 (0%) - 8.39 (5.99%) More than 8 errors present Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D 8.4 (6%) - 9.79 (6.99%) 7-8 errors present Fair 70-79% C 9.8 (7%) - 11.19 (7.99%) 5-6 errors present Proficient 80-89% B 11.2 (8%) - 12.59 (8.99%) 3-4 errors present Exemplary 90-100% A 12.6 (9%) - 14 (10%) 0-2 errors present Feedback: