This is a series of 7 questions-- 4 of them are only 75 word min. and 3 of them are 250 word min.

Here is a list of the questions that needs to be answered. They have to be individually answered. They can be submitted back to me all on the same page, just need to be labeled as they appear—Question 1, then the answer and so on. It is very important to include in-text citations and references, and the word count requirement has to be met. This is due by tomorrow evening, so I would like to have it by 5:00 P.M Eastern Time if not before then. We are required to use at least our textbook as source material for our response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying citations. Our textbook is:

Harr, J. S., Hess, M. H., & Orthmann, C. H. (2012). Constitutional law and the criminal justice system (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

1. Describe how one might efficiently and effectively research an area of law? (Min. 75 words)

 

2. Describe the difference between the Supreme Court’s original and appellate jurisdiction. Explain which area of jurisdiction is more significant and why. (Min. 75 words)

3. What are some factors to consider in evaluating the reliability of research information? How do you determine if a case is still good law? (Min. 75 words)

4. What authority does Congress have over jurisdiction of the Supreme Court? (Min. 75 words)

5.  What is a Writ of Certiorari? How is such a writ granted, and what is the significance of a writ being granted or denied? ( Min. 250 words)

6.   Explain the establishment and rationale behind the Supreme Court’s power of judicial review as it relates to governmental entities. What are the arguments for and against this type of review? (Min. 250 words)

7. What is the importance of reading dissenting opinions and concurring opinions of the Supreme Court if they are not binding law? ( Min. 250 words)