Bus system analysis

profilesajeer
kendall_sad9_pp_041.ppt

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4

Kendall & Kendall
Systems Analysis and Design, 9e

Information Gathering: Interactive Methods

*

*

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Objectives

  • Recognize the value of interactive methods for information gathering.
  • Construct interview questions to elicit human information requirements and structure them in a way that is meaningful to users.
  • Understand the purpose of stories and why they are useful in systems analysis.
  • Understand the concept of JAD and when to use it.
  • Write effective questions to survey users about their work.
  • Design and administer effective questionnaires.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Interactive Methods to Elicit Human Information Requirements

  • Interviewing
  • Joint Application Design (JAD)
  • Questionnaires

*

The commonality of these methods is talking with and listening to people in the organization in order to understand their interactions with technology through a series of carefully composed questions.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Major Topics

  • Interviewing
  • Interview preparation
  • Question types
  • Arranging questions
  • The interview report
  • User Stories
  • Joint Application Design (JAD)
  • Involvement
  • Location
  • Questionnaires
  • Writing questions
  • Using scales
  • Design
  • Administering

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Interviewing

  • Interviewing is an important method for collecting data on human and system information requirements
  • Interviews reveal information about:

Interviewee opinions

Interviewee feelings

Goals

Key HCI concerns

*

Opinions—may be more revealing and more important then facts. By seeking opinion rather then fact you can discover key problems.

Feelings—you can understand the organization’s culture more fully by listening to the feelings of the respondent.

Goals – project the organization’s future. You may not be able to determine goals through any other method.

HCI – the ergonomic aspects, the system usability, how pleasing and enjoyable the system is, and how useful it is in supporting individual tasks.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Interview Preparation

  • Reading background material
  • Establishing interview objectives
  • Deciding whom to interview
  • Preparing the interviewee
  • Deciding on question types and structure

*

Reading background material—read and understand as much background information about the interviewees and their organization as possible.

  • Corporate website
  • Current annual report
  • Corporate news letter
  • Any publication sent out to explain the organization to the public
  • Standard & Poor’s

Trying to build a common vocabulary to phrase interview questions and to maximize the interview time.

Establishing interview objectives—four to six key areas concerning HCI, information processing and decision-making behavior.

Deciding whom to interview—strive for balance so that as many users’ needs are addressed as possible.

Preparing the interviewee—call ahead; keep to 45 minutes to an hour at the most.

Deciding on question types and structure—write questions to cover the key areas of decision making that you discovered when you ascertained interview objectives.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Question Types

  • Open-ended
  • Closed

*

Each question type can accomplish something a little different from the other, and each has benefits and drawbacks.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Open-Ended Questions

  • Open-ended interview questions allow interviewees to respond how they wish, and to what length they wish
  • Open-ended interview questions are appropriate when the analyst is interested in breadth and depth of reply

*

“Open” actually describes the interviewee’s options for responding. They are open.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Advantages of Open-Ended Questions

  • Puts the interviewee at ease
  • Allows the interviewer to pick up on the interviewee’s vocabulary
  • Provides richness of detail
  • Reveals avenues of further questioning that may have gone untapped

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Advantages of Open-Ended Questions (continued)

  • Provides more interest for the interviewee
  • Allows more spontaneity
  • Makes phrasing easier for the interviewer
  • Useful if the interviewer is unprepared

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Disadvantages of Open-Ended Questions

  • May result in too much irrelevant detail
  • Possibly losing control of the interview
  • May take too much time for the amount of useful information gained
  • Potentially seeming that the interviewer is unprepared
  • Possibly giving the impression that the interviewer is on a “fishing expedition”

*

The analyst needs to carefully consider the implications of using open-ended questions for interviewing.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Closed Interview Questions

  • Closed interview questions limit the number of possible responses
  • Closed interview questions are appropriate for generating precise, reliable data that is easy to analyze
  • The methodology is efficient, and it requires little skill for interviewers to administer

*

The alternative to open-ended questions.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Benefits of Closed Interview Questions

  • Saving interview time
  • Easily comparing interviews
  • Getting to the point
  • Keeping control of the interview
  • Covering a large area quickly
  • Getting to relevant data

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Disadvantages of Closed Interview Questions

  • Boring for the interviewee
  • Failure to obtain rich detailing
  • Missing main ideas
  • Failing to build rapport between interviewer and interviewee

*

As the interviewer you must think carefully about the question types you will use.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Attributes of Open-Ended and Closed Questions (Figure 4.5)

*

Choosing one question type over the other involves a trade-off; although an open-ended question affords breath and depth of reply, responses to open-ended questions are difficult to analyze.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Bipolar Questions

  • Bipolar questions are those that may be answered with a “yes” or “no” or “agree” or “disagree”
  • Bipolar questions should be used sparingly
  • A special kind of closed question

*

This type of closed question limits the interviewee even further by allowing a choice on either “pole,” such as yes or no, true or false, agree or disagree.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Probes

  • Probing questions elicit more detail about previous questions
  • The purpose of probing questions is:
  • To get more meaning
  • To clarify
  • To draw out and expand on the interviewee’s point
  • May be either open-ended or closed

*

Used as a follow-up question.

The strongest probe is simply—Why?

It is essential to probe so that we don’t accept superficial answers.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Arranging Questions

  • Pyramid
  • Starting with closed questions and working toward open-ended questions
  • Funnel
  • Starting with open-ended questions and working toward closed questions
  • Diamond
  • Starting with closed, moving toward open-ended, and ending with closed questions

*

There are two ways of organizing interviews—pyramid and funnel, the diamond approach combines both.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Pyramid Structure

  • Begins with very detailed, often closed questions
  • Expands by allowing open-ended questions and more generalized responses
  • Is useful if interviewees need to be warmed up to the topic or seem reluctant to address the topic

*

Inductive organization of interview questions.

Also useful if you want an ending determination about the topic.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Pyramid Structure for Interviewing Goes from Specific to General Questions (Figure 4.7 )

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Funnel Structure

  • Begins with generalized, open-ended questions
  • Concludes by narrowing the possible responses using closed questions
  • Provides an easy, nonthreatening way to begin an interview
  • Is useful when the interviewee feels emotionally about the topic

*

Deductive organization of interview questions.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Funnel Structure for Interviewing Begins with Broad Questions then Funnels to Specific Questions (Figure 4.8)

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Diamond Structure

  • A diamond-shaped structure begins in a very specific way
  • Then more general issues are examined
  • Concludes with specific questions
  • Combines the strength of both the pyramid and funnel structures
  • Takes longer than the other structures

*

The diamond structure combines the strengths of the pyramid and funnel approach but has the disadvantage of taking longer.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Diamond-Shaped Structure for Interviewing Combines the Pyramid and Funnel Structures (Figure 4.9)

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Closing the Interview

  • Always ask “Is there anything else that you would like to add?”
  • Summarize and provide feedback on your impressions
  • Ask whom you should talk with next
  • Set up any future appointments
  • Thank them for their time and shake hands.

*

“Is there anything else that you would like to add?” —considered a formula question the response will often be “No.”

In form the interviewee about the next steps to take.

Always remember to thank the interviewee for their time.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Interview Report

  • Write as soon as possible after the interview
  • Provide an initial summary, then more detail
  • Review the report with the respondent

*

The longer you wait to write your report, the more suspect your data becomes.

Review the report with the respondent—helps clarify the meaning the interviewee had in mind and lets the interviewee know that you care.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Stories

  • Stories originate in the workplace
  • Organizational stories are used to relay some kind of information
  • When a story is told and retold over time it takes on a mythic quality
  • Isolated stories are good when you are looking for facts
  • Enduring stories capture all aspects of the organization and are the ones a systems analyst should look for

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Purposes for Telling a Story

  • There are four purposes for telling a story:
  • Experiential stories describe what the business or industry is like
  • Explanatory stories tell why the organization acted a certain way
  • Validating stories are used to convince people that the organization made the correct decision
  • Prescriptive stories tell the listener how to act
  • Systems analysts can use storytelling as a complement to other information gathering methods

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Joint Application Design (JAD)

  • Joint Application Design (JAD) can replace a series of interviews with the user community
  • JAD is a technique that allows the analyst to accomplish requirements analysis and design the user interface with the users in a group setting

*

An alternative approach to interviewing users one by one.

Developed by IBM.

The motivation was to cut the time and hence the cost required by interviews. It also creates more use identification with new systems as a result of the participative process.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Conditions That Support the Use of JAD

  • Users are restless and want something new
  • The organizational culture supports joint problem-solving behaviors
  • Analysts forecast an increase in the number of ideas using JAD
  • Personnel may be absent from their jobs for the length of time required

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Who Is Involved

  • Executive sponsor
  • IS analyst
  • Users
  • Session leader
  • Observers
  • Scribe

*

All project team members must be committed to the JAD approach and become involved.

Executive sponsor—a senior person who will introduce and conclude the JAD session.

IS Analyst—gives an expert opinion about any disproportionate costs of solutions proposed.

Users—try to select users that can articulate what information they need to perform their jobs as well as what they desire in anew or improved computer system.

Session leader—someone who has excellent communication skills to facilitate appropriate interactions.

Observers—analysts or technical experts from other functional areas to offer technical explanations and advice.

Scribe—formally write down everything that is done.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Where to Hold JAD Meetings

  • Offsite
  • Comfortable surroundings
  • Minimize distractions
  • Attendance
  • Schedule when participants can attend
  • Agenda
  • Orientation meeting

*

Hold offsite to minimize the daily distractions and responsibilities of the participants’ regular work.

Do not hold the session unless everyone can attend. An agenda should be giving out before the meeting so the participants know what to expect. If possible an orientation meeting can be given.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Benefits of JAD

  • Time is saved, compared with traditional interviewing
  • Rapid development of systems
  • Improved user ownership of the system
  • Creative idea production is improved

*

Some organizations have estimated a 15 percent time savings over traditional.

Helps users become involved early in systems projects and treats their feedback seriously.

Much like brainstorming which allows for creative idea production.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Drawbacks of Using JAD

  • JAD requires a large block of time to be available for all session participants
  • If preparation or the follow-up report is incomplete, the session may not be successful
  • The organizational skills and culture may not be conducive to a JAD session

*

It is not possible to do other activities concurrently or to time-shift any activities, as is typically done in one-to-one interviewing.

It is a judgmental decision if the organization is truly committed to, and prepared for , this approach.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Questionnaires

Questionnaires are useful in gathering information from key organization members about:

  • Attitudes
  • Beliefs
  • Behaviors
  • Characteristics

*

Attributes—what people in the organization say they want.

Beliefs—what people think is actually true.

Behavior—what organizational members do.

Characteristics—properties of people or things.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Planning for the Use of Questionnaires

  • Organization members are widely dispersed
  • Many members are involved with the project
  • Exploratory work is needed
  • Problem solving prior to interviews is necessary

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Question Types

Questions are designed as either:

  • Open-ended
  • Try to anticipate the response you will get
  • Well suited for getting opinions
  • Closed
  • Use when all the options may be listed
  • When the options are mutually exclusive

*

Even when you write an open-ended question, it must be narrow enough to guide respondents to answer in a specific way.

Use open-ended questions when it is impossible to list effectively all possible responses to a question.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Trade-offs between the Use of Open-Ended and Closed Questions on Questionnaires (Figure 4.12)

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Questionnaire Language

  • Simple
  • Specific
  • Short
  • Not patronizing
  • Free of bias
  • Addressed to those who are knowledgeable
  • Technically accurate
  • Appropriate for the reading level of the respondent

*

Write questionnaires in the respondents own language usage.

Simple – Use the language of the respondents whenever possible.

Specific – work at being specific rather then vague in wording.

Short – keep questions short

Not patronizing – do not talk down to participants through low-level language choices.

Free of bias – also means avoiding objectionable questions.

Addressed to those who are knowledgeable – target questions to correct respondents.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Measurement Scales

  • The two different forms of measurement scales are:
  • Nominal
  • Interval

*

Scaling is the process of assigning numbers or other symbols to an attribute or characteristic for the purpose of measuring that attribute or characteristic.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Nominal Scales

  • Nominal scales are used to classify things
  • It is the weakest form of measurement
  • Data may be totaled

What type of software do you use the most?

1 = Word Processor

2 = Spreadsheet

3 = Database

4 = An Email Program

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Interval Scales

  • An interval scale is used when the intervals are equal
  • There is no absolute zero
  • Examples of interval scales include the Fahrenheit or Centigrade scale

How useful is the support given by the Technical Support Group?

NOT USEFUL EXTREMELY

AT ALL USEFUL

1 2 3 4 5

*

More complete analysis can be performed on interval scales.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Validity and Reliability

  • Reliability of scales refers to consistency in response—getting the same results if the same questionnaire was administered again under the same conditions
  • Validity is the degree to which the question measures what the analyst intends to measure

*

Questionnaires must be valid and reliable.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Problems with Scales

  • Leniency
  • Central tendency
  • Halo effect

*

Construction of scales is a serious task, which must consider the problems associated with their construction.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Leniency

  • Caused by easy raters
  • Solution is to move the “average” category to the left or right of center

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Central Tendency

  • Central tendency occurs when respondents rate everything as average
  • Improve by making the differences smaller at the two ends
  • Adjust the strength of the descriptors
  • Create a scale with more points

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Halo Effect

  • When the impression formed in one question carries into the next question
  • Solution is to place one trait and several items on each page

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Designing the Questionnaire

  • Allow ample white space
  • Allow ample space to write or type in responses
  • Make it easy for respondents to clearly mark their answers
  • Be consistent in style

*

A well designed, relevant questionnaire can help overcome some of this resistance to respond.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Order of Questions

  • Place most important questions first
  • Cluster items of similar content together
  • Introduce less controversial questions first

*

You want respondents to feel as unthreatened by and interested in the questions being asked as possible, without getting overwrought about a particular issue.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Administering Questionnaires

  • Administering questionnaires has two main questions:
  • Who in the organization should receive the questionnaire
  • How should the questionnaire be administered

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Ways to Capture Responses When Designing a Web Survey (Figure 4.13)

*

When you design questionnaires for the Web, apply the same rules you use when designing paper questionnaires.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Methods of Administering the Questionnaire

  • Convening all concerned respondents together at one time
  • Personally administering the questionnaire
  • Allowing respondents to self-administer the questionnaire
  • Mailing questionnaires
  • Administering over the Web or via email

*

The choice of administering the questionnaire may be determined by the existing business situation.

Both email and Web surveys are self–administered; response are a little lower then other methods, but may result in less guarded answers.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Electronically Submitting Questionnaires

  • Reduced costs
  • Collecting and storing the results electronically

*

Reminders can be sent.

Kendall & Kendall Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall

4-*

Summary

  • Interviewing
  • Interview preparation
  • Question types
  • Arranging questions
  • The interview report
  • Stories
  • Joint Application Design (JAD)
  • Involvement and location
  • Questionnaires
  • Writing questions
  • Using scales and overcoming problems
  • Design and order
  • Administering and submitting

4-*

Copyright © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc.  

Publishing as Prentice Hall

*