Analysis paper
Name: Title:
CAPSTONE PAPER GRADING RUBRIC (100 POINTS)
FAILING UNACCEPTABLE ACCEPTABLE GOOD EXCEPTIONAL POINTS
1-F 2- D 3-C 4-B 5-A
Introduction Problem selected is not
well-defined– too narrow or
too broad
Problem area is vague or
confusing
Problem area is clearly
identified
Identified problem is
unique; exceeds minimum
level
Identified problem is complex;
original and multi-dimensional
Organization Fails to arrange paper
accordingly and does not
follow format
Unclear, confusing- paper
does not provide direction
or follow suggested
format
Follows format and
provides description of
problem
Follows format, provides
description of problem,
presents information in an
understandable easy to
follow format
Organizational skills are excellent –
follows format, good chronology of
problem, superior information
presentation and documentation
within paper
Literature
Review
Fails to provide pertinent
information on problem
Literature review defines
problem yet lacks
supportive information on
problem
Literature review provides
basic background and
description of problem
Literature review provides
good depth and breadth
description of problem
Literature review provides excellent
breadth and depth of explanation of
problem.
Theory Fails to apply and explain
the problem
Improper theory
selection/application –
lacks depth
Acceptable standard of
theory application
Theory selection based
upon sound reasoning -
Theory application goes
beyond minimum - good
Selection of theory shows excellent
ability to apply principles - Theory
application demonstrates depth and
originality
Position Fails to support position in
any manner through the use
of credible research and
uses inappropriate court
case.
Lacks supportive research
– personal opinions
interjected in paper along
with research results and
an unlinked court case.
Position meets acceptable
level of competence- uses
research to support
position and appropriate
court case.
Position is supported by
good research materials,
extremely relevant court
case and student
explanation of materials.
Position has excellent depth and
quality - uses outstanding reasoning
and informs beyond research and
provides in depth explanation of
relevancy of court case.
Alternative
Positions
Alternative viewpoints are
non-existent or fail to
explain problem
Alternative viewpoints are
unclear or lack acceptable
application
Alternative viewpoints are
acceptable--clearly
explains other
perspectives
Alternative viewpoints are
carefully developed based
on research and
considerate thought
process
Multiple alternative viewpoints are
offered. Viewpoints are carefully
developed based on research, critical
thinking and reflective thought
process.
Critical
Reflection
Ffail to explain overall
content of paper and no
reflection is offered.
Critical reflection and
conclusions are unclear –
lack basis in reasoning and
fail to illuminate key
concepts of paper, while
reflection is minimal.
Acceptable - detailed
conclusions reached based
upon research, reasoning
and critical thinking
through informed
reflection.
Conclusions based upon
sound research and
reasoning while
complementing key facets
of paper through critical
thinking and reflection.
Depth and quality of conclusions
clearly and cogently provide a sound
factual basis for understanding paper
while providing a superior critical
thinking basis for reflection on
problem.
Grammar
Mechanics
Grammar, spelling and
punctuation fails to reflect
quality necessary for degree
seeking BS/BA student-
Student fails
Grammar, spelling and
punctuation is poor, 5-7
mistakes
Grammar, spelling and
punctuation acceptable, 3-
4 mistakes
Grammar, spelling and
punctuation good – 1-2
mistakes
Grammar, spelling and punctuation
exceptional – no mistakes
References Fails to follow APA format
in text and References
section
APA format has more than
5 mistakes
APA format has 3-4
Mistakes
APA format has 1-2
mistakes
Excellent APA format- mistake free
TOTAL
TOTAL X
5.5