What is Organizational Knowledge

Introduction – No real introduction to the paper

Thorough discussion of topic – (1) (2) see below

Findings, conclusions, summary – very weak wrap up

Sufficient sources: minimum 10-15 (3) see below

APA style followed – (1) (4) see below

(1) I know that APA is not only a style that specifies how to cite its greatest value is that is tells how to write a paper, how to organize a paper and present it in the most organized logical way. This is based on using sub-headings (that I develop starting with the overview, then the topic broken down to its components, follow by the conclusion) that I develop an outline with. Then I should write the paper by filling in the outline. Not using sub-headings made my paper choppy and disorganized and makes it difficult to find all of the components that I put in the paper.

(2) This is very weak, basically a minimalist presentation of some things that I found in the sources that I did use. The purpose of this paper is for me to develop a sound understanding of the topic, thus using the simple question of "What is Organizational Knowledge?" the searching the literature, synthesizing what is found there, then presenting my discussion. This is extremely weak.

(3) The reason the minimum number of sources is 10-15 is to make sure that I gathered enough of the current knowledge on my topic (no pun intended) in order to do an adequate job of synthesizing that knowledge into my review of the literature as it applies to this topic. This would make my discussion much stronger.

(4) There are way too many citations missing from this.

Thanks you.