2 power point slides for critical thinking class
wheone
mgt_350_week_5_team_assignment_grading_rubric.docxGrading Rubric – PowerPoint® Presentation
|
Criterion |
Unsatisfactory |
Needs Improvement |
Meets Requirements |
Points earned |
|
Content & Development 50%
Each team member describes the decision-making processes most prevalent in their organization.
Discusses strengths and weaknesses of the problem identification and formulation styles in each team member’s organization.
For each problem identification style, describes examples of how problem statements could be prepared based on stakeholder needs.
|
Content is incomplete or omits some requirements.
Major points are not clear and /or persuasive. Presentation does not include presenter’s notes. |
Content is not comprehensive and /or persuasive.
Major points are addressed, but not well supported.
Research is inadequate or does not address course concepts.
Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.
Presenter’s notes are not complete |
Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive.
Major points are stated clearly and are well supported.
Research is adequate, timely and addresses course concepts.
Content and purpose of the writing are clear.
Presentation contains clear presenter’s notes |
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Organization & Structure 20% |
Organization and structure detract from the message of the writer.
Presentation is not directed towards appropriate audience.
Slides contain too much clip art or words.
|
Structure of the presentation is not easy to follow.
Presentation is not directed towards appropriate audience.
Section transitions need improvement.
Some slides contain too much information
|
Structure of the presentation is clear and easy to follow.
Presentation is directed towards the appropriate audience.
Transitions between sections aid in maintaining flow of thought.
|
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Format 10%
References are properly cited
URLs are provided for electronic sources
|
Presentation lacks many elements of correct APA format.
Citations and references are not provided. |
Presentation follows most guidelines for APA format.
Presentation provides citations, but they are incorrectly prepared.
Presentation provides reference slide, with some errors or omissions.
|
Presentation contains designated guidelines for APA format.
Citations and references are used appropriately. |
|
|
Comments |
|
|
|
|
|
Grammar, Punctuation, Spelling & Readability 20%
Presentation contains 10-15 slides |
Presentation contains numerous grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors;
Language uses jargon or conversational tone.
Presentation is inadequate/excessive length.
|
Presentation contains few grammatical, punctuation and spelling errors
Language lacks clarity or includes the use of some jargon or conversational tone.
Presentation is over/ under word length.
|
Rules of grammar, usage, and punctuation are followed; spelling is correct.
Language is clear and precise; sentences display consistently strong, varied structure.
Presentation is the appropriate length as described for the assignment.
|
|
|
Comments |
|
. |
|
|
|
Total Score |
|
|
|
|
