Ten pages Paper

profileLisa
key_terms__definitions.ppt

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

KEY TERMS & DEFINITIONS

 Theory
 Theoretical Assumptions (incl. ontological,
epistemological and axiological)
 Paradigms
 Models
 Methodology
 Methods

Professor Jim Macnamara PhD, FPRIA, FAMI, CPM, FAMEC

Professor of Public Communication

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Uh oh … theory!

  • Theory =
  • “An organised set of concepts, explanations and principles of some aspect of human experience” (Littlejohn & Foss 2008, p. 14)
  • A set of concepts used to define and/or explain some phenomenon (Silverman 2000)
  • “Theory consists of plausible relationships produced among concepts and sets of concepts (Strauss & Corbin 1994, p. 278)
  • “Theories are explanations of phenomena” (Balnaves, Donald & Shoesmith 2009, p. 278)

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Key terms

  • Concept
  • Terms and definitions that classify and label variables being studied according to perceived patterns (eg. symmetric communication)
  • Explanation
  • The “logical force” behind a theory, answering the question “why?” Can be causal or practical
  • Principles
  • The final dimension of theories – guidelines that enable interpretation of an event and aid interpretation and decisions on how to act
  • Taxonomies
  • List of categories without explanation of how they relate (taxonomies generally fall short of theory as they lack explanation and principles)

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Key terms

  • Ontology
  • Branch of philosophy that studies the nature of existence
  • Key questions:

What is truth? Is there ‘one truth’ waiting to be discovered – or multiple truths (i.e. valid perspectives, views, beliefs)?

What is reality? Scientific realism or social constructed – i.e. realist or relativist?

Are humans agentic (pragmatist) or determined by external conditions (determinist)

Is human behaviour mainly traits or states?

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Key terms

  • Epistemology
  • Branch of philosophy that studies how knowledge is created – how people know what they know
  • “the nature and status of knowledge” (Silverman 2000)
  • Key questions asked:

Is knowledge immutable and absolute (universalist) or constructed through perceptions, experiences, etc (relativist)

Can we be ‘objective’ or are we subjective – or intersubjective (sharing subjectivities)?

Can we be independent in our assessments or interdependent?

Does knowledge arise through rationalism, empiricism or constructivism?

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Key terms

  • Axiology
  • Branch of philosophy that studies values – what values guide or influence thinking and action and the implications of those values

Can we be value free – or are we value-laden (i.e. biased) in various ways?

Do we conduct value-conscious scholarship – or value-free scholarship?

To what extent does the process of inquiry itself affect what is being seen?

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Positivist v Naturalistic/Interpretative Paradigms

Based on Creswell, J. 1994 cited in Frey, et al. 2000, p. 18. (1) Grossberg, et al. 2006, p. 205.

ASSUMPTION KEY QUESTIONS POSITIVIST PARADIGM INTERPRETATIVE PARADIGM
Ontological Assumption What is the nature of reality? Singular (one reality) One truth Realist Multiple realities Multiple truths Relativist
Epistemological Assumption What is the relationship of the researcher to that being researched? (How do we acquire knowledge?) Independent Objectivist Interdependent Subjectivist Constructionist (Constructionism denies any access to reality other than representations)1
Axiological Assumption What is the role of values in the research process? Value-free Unbiased Value-laden Biased
Rhetorical Assumption What is the language used? Formal Impersonal Voice Informal Personal voice

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Positivist v Naturalistic/Interpretative Paradigms

Based on Creswell, J. 1994 cited in Frey, et al. 2000, p. 18.

ASSUMPTION QUESTION POSITIVIST PARADIGM INTERPRETATIVE PARADIGM
Methodological Assumption What is the process of inquiry or research? Deduction Search for cause an effect relationships between variables Static design Researcher controlled setting Quantitative methods Context-free generalisations Goals of explanation, prediction and control Induction Holistic understanding of patterns/behaviour Emergent design Natural setting Qualitative methods Context-bound findings Goals of understanding and social change

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Types of theory

  • Nomothetic theory
  • Seeks universal and general laws
  • Method is (1) develop questions; (2) form hypotheses; (3) test hypotheses; (4) formulate answers (theory)

Deductive

Rationalist and empirical

  • Practical theory (ideographic)
  • Seeks to capture differences and diversity to provide understanding that helps people to weigh up alternatives
  • Recognises knowledge is created by humans, it is created socially, is historically based, and is value laden

Inductive

Constructionist

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Nomothetic Ideographic/Practical

  • Objective
  • Scientific
  • Empirical
  • More quantitative
  • Effectiveness in persuasion
  • Systematic/logical
  • Causal/linear
  • The truth is out there
  • Knowledge is discovered through observation
  • Interpretive
  • Humanist
  • Contextual
  • More qualitative
  • Participation and negotiation
  • Free human agency
  • Non-linear, no sequence
  • Truth lies within – we create our own truths
  • Knowledge arises out of interaction between knower and known

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Theory and practice?

  • “There is nothing so practical as a good theory” (Kurt Lewin 1951, p. 169)
  • “Theory and practice vitally interact, and one renews the other” (Boyer 1990, p. 23)
  • Theory and practice can and should be integrated, each informing the other

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Three Approaches to Scholarship

  • Scientific
  • The ‘natural sciences’
  • Informed by ‘The Enlightenment’ and Modernism – rationalist, empirical
  • The “discovered world” – objective ‘truth’ is out there
  • Socio-scientific
  • Birth of the social sciences
  • Uses elements of the scientific approach, but focuses on humans – particularly in a social setting
  • How they behave in creating, exchanging and interpreting meaning
  • Humanist
  • Individual subjectivity, human interpretation
  • “The discovering person” – ‘truth’ is constructed inside

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Some terms

  • Paradigm
  • A framework within which theories are formulated, a theoretical framework (eg. postmodernism, constructionism)
  • From the Greek word paradeigma meaning a pattern
  • As well as providing a clearly articulated and accepted framework for understanding reality, paradigms can be confining (Kuhn)

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Some terms

  • Model
  • Some such as Silverman (2000, p. 77) use ‘model’ in the same sense as paradigm for an “overall framework for looking at reality”
  • A more common use is in referring to a set of procedures to follow,a mapping of an approach
  • A practical demonstration or visualisation or a theory or concept
  • “An abstract representation of a process, a description of its structure or function” (Trenholm 2008, p. 23)
  • Models are always incomplete because they are simplified representations of complex processes (Trenholm 2008, p 24)

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

Some terms

  • Methodology
  • The overall approach to studying research topics – often used in place of ‘method’ (see below).
  • “Methodology is the ontological beliefs that give shape to the process of knowing (the science of method)” (Balnaves, Donald & Shoesmith 2009, p. 278)
  • Usually considered to be quantitative or qualitative, or overall research approaches such as ethnographic
  • Method
  • A specific research technique – eg. experiments, surveys, interviews, case studies, observation, etc

UTS:

THINK. CHANGE. DO

References

Boyer, E. 1990, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.

Grossberg, L. Wartella, E. Whitney, D. & Macgregor Wise, J. 2006, Media Making: Mass Media in a Popular Culture, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.

Frey, L. Botan, C. & Kreps, G. 2000, Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methods, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.

Lewin, K. 1951, Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers, D. Cartwright (ed.), Harper & Row, New York.

Littlejohn, S. & Foss, K. 2008, Theories of Human Communication, 9th edn, Thomson-Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.

Silverman, D. 2000, Doing Qualitative Research, Sage, London.

Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1994, ‘Grounded theory methodology: An overview’ in N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 262-72.