Ten pages Paper
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
KEY TERMS & DEFINITIONS
Theory
Theoretical Assumptions (incl. ontological,
epistemological and axiological)
Paradigms
Models
Methodology
Methods
Professor Jim Macnamara PhD, FPRIA, FAMI, CPM, FAMEC
Professor of Public Communication
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Uh oh … theory!
- Theory =
- “An organised set of concepts, explanations and principles of some aspect of human experience” (Littlejohn & Foss 2008, p. 14)
- A set of concepts used to define and/or explain some phenomenon (Silverman 2000)
- “Theory consists of plausible relationships produced among concepts and sets of concepts (Strauss & Corbin 1994, p. 278)
- “Theories are explanations of phenomena” (Balnaves, Donald & Shoesmith 2009, p. 278)
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Key terms
- Concept
- Terms and definitions that classify and label variables being studied according to perceived patterns (eg. symmetric communication)
- Explanation
- The “logical force” behind a theory, answering the question “why?” Can be causal or practical
- Principles
- The final dimension of theories – guidelines that enable interpretation of an event and aid interpretation and decisions on how to act
- Taxonomies
- List of categories without explanation of how they relate (taxonomies generally fall short of theory as they lack explanation and principles)
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Key terms
- Ontology
- Branch of philosophy that studies the nature of existence
- Key questions:
What is truth? Is there ‘one truth’ waiting to be discovered – or multiple truths (i.e. valid perspectives, views, beliefs)?
What is reality? Scientific realism or social constructed – i.e. realist or relativist?
Are humans agentic (pragmatist) or determined by external conditions (determinist)
Is human behaviour mainly traits or states?
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Key terms
- Epistemology
- Branch of philosophy that studies how knowledge is created – how people know what they know
- “the nature and status of knowledge” (Silverman 2000)
- Key questions asked:
Is knowledge immutable and absolute (universalist) or constructed through perceptions, experiences, etc (relativist)
Can we be ‘objective’ or are we subjective – or intersubjective (sharing subjectivities)?
Can we be independent in our assessments or interdependent?
Does knowledge arise through rationalism, empiricism or constructivism?
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Key terms
- Axiology
- Branch of philosophy that studies values – what values guide or influence thinking and action and the implications of those values
Can we be value free – or are we value-laden (i.e. biased) in various ways?
Do we conduct value-conscious scholarship – or value-free scholarship?
To what extent does the process of inquiry itself affect what is being seen?
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Positivist v Naturalistic/Interpretative Paradigms
Based on Creswell, J. 1994 cited in Frey, et al. 2000, p. 18. (1) Grossberg, et al. 2006, p. 205.
| ASSUMPTION | KEY QUESTIONS | POSITIVIST PARADIGM | INTERPRETATIVE PARADIGM |
| Ontological Assumption | What is the nature of reality? | Singular (one reality) One truth Realist | Multiple realities Multiple truths Relativist |
| Epistemological Assumption | What is the relationship of the researcher to that being researched? (How do we acquire knowledge?) | Independent Objectivist | Interdependent Subjectivist Constructionist (Constructionism denies any access to reality other than representations)1 |
| Axiological Assumption | What is the role of values in the research process? | Value-free Unbiased | Value-laden Biased |
| Rhetorical Assumption | What is the language used? | Formal Impersonal Voice | Informal Personal voice |
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Positivist v Naturalistic/Interpretative Paradigms
Based on Creswell, J. 1994 cited in Frey, et al. 2000, p. 18.
| ASSUMPTION | QUESTION | POSITIVIST PARADIGM | INTERPRETATIVE PARADIGM |
| Methodological Assumption | What is the process of inquiry or research? | Deduction Search for cause an effect relationships between variables Static design Researcher controlled setting Quantitative methods Context-free generalisations Goals of explanation, prediction and control | Induction Holistic understanding of patterns/behaviour Emergent design Natural setting Qualitative methods Context-bound findings Goals of understanding and social change |
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Types of theory
- Nomothetic theory
- Seeks universal and general laws
- Method is (1) develop questions; (2) form hypotheses; (3) test hypotheses; (4) formulate answers (theory)
Deductive
Rationalist and empirical
- Practical theory (ideographic)
- Seeks to capture differences and diversity to provide understanding that helps people to weigh up alternatives
- Recognises knowledge is created by humans, it is created socially, is historically based, and is value laden
Inductive
Constructionist
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Nomothetic Ideographic/Practical
- Objective
- Scientific
- Empirical
- More quantitative
- Effectiveness in persuasion
- Systematic/logical
- Causal/linear
- The truth is out there
- Knowledge is discovered through observation
- Interpretive
- Humanist
- Contextual
- More qualitative
- Participation and negotiation
- Free human agency
- Non-linear, no sequence
- Truth lies within – we create our own truths
- Knowledge arises out of interaction between knower and known
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Theory and practice?
- “There is nothing so practical as a good theory” (Kurt Lewin 1951, p. 169)
- “Theory and practice vitally interact, and one renews the other” (Boyer 1990, p. 23)
- Theory and practice can and should be integrated, each informing the other
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Three Approaches to Scholarship
- Scientific
- The ‘natural sciences’
- Informed by ‘The Enlightenment’ and Modernism – rationalist, empirical
- The “discovered world” – objective ‘truth’ is out there
- Socio-scientific
- Birth of the social sciences
- Uses elements of the scientific approach, but focuses on humans – particularly in a social setting
- How they behave in creating, exchanging and interpreting meaning
- Humanist
- Individual subjectivity, human interpretation
- “The discovering person” – ‘truth’ is constructed inside
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Some terms
- Paradigm
- A framework within which theories are formulated, a theoretical framework (eg. postmodernism, constructionism)
- From the Greek word paradeigma meaning a pattern
- As well as providing a clearly articulated and accepted framework for understanding reality, paradigms can be confining (Kuhn)
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Some terms
- Model
- Some such as Silverman (2000, p. 77) use ‘model’ in the same sense as paradigm for an “overall framework for looking at reality”
- A more common use is in referring to a set of procedures to follow,a mapping of an approach
- A practical demonstration or visualisation or a theory or concept
- “An abstract representation of a process, a description of its structure or function” (Trenholm 2008, p. 23)
- Models are always incomplete because they are simplified representations of complex processes (Trenholm 2008, p 24)
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
Some terms
- Methodology
- The overall approach to studying research topics – often used in place of ‘method’ (see below).
- “Methodology is the ontological beliefs that give shape to the process of knowing (the science of method)” (Balnaves, Donald & Shoesmith 2009, p. 278)
- Usually considered to be quantitative or qualitative, or overall research approaches such as ethnographic
- Method
- A specific research technique – eg. experiments, surveys, interviews, case studies, observation, etc
UTS:
THINK. CHANGE. DO
References
Boyer, E. 1990, Scholarship Reconsidered: Priorities of the Professoriate, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ.
Grossberg, L. Wartella, E. Whitney, D. & Macgregor Wise, J. 2006, Media Making: Mass Media in a Popular Culture, 2nd edn, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
Frey, L. Botan, C. & Kreps, G. 2000, Investigating Communication: An Introduction to Research Methods, Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights, MA.
Lewin, K. 1951, Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers, D. Cartwright (ed.), Harper & Row, New York.
Littlejohn, S. & Foss, K. 2008, Theories of Human Communication, 9th edn, Thomson-Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.
Silverman, D. 2000, Doing Qualitative Research, Sage, London.
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. 1994, ‘Grounded theory methodology: An overview’ in N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (eds), Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 262-72.