Additional Excel
globalRiverConservancy.xlsx
Part A - Demographic Analysis
| Global River Conservancy | |||||
| Survey Demographic Analysis - Contributions | |||||
| Basic Assumptions: | |||||
| Percentage of | Contributions | ||||
| Income | Households | Average | per | Growth | |
| Level: | Contributing: | Contributions: | Household: | Rates: | |
| $0-$20K | 8.10% | $52 | |||
| $21-$40K | 25.37% | $91 | |||
| $41-$70K | 58.00% | $152 | |||
| $71-$100K | 65.10% | $168 | |||
| Over $100K | 55.14% | $177 | |||
| Estimates of Households: By Income Level | |||||
| Income | |||||
| Level: | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 |
| $0-$20K | 1181684 | 1033429 | 885174 | ||
| $21-$40K | 544895 | 671640 | 798355 | ||
| $41-$70K | 103037 | 352105 | 601173 | ||
| $71-$100K | 25766 | 109787 | 193828 | ||
| Over $100K | 17172 | 57735 | 98297 | ||
| Total | |||||
| Source: Adapted from U.S. Census Reports 1980,1990,2000 | |||||
| Estimated Environmental Contributions By Income Level | |||||
| Income | |||||
| Level: | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 |
| $0-$20K | |||||
| $21-$40K | |||||
| $41-$70K | |||||
| $71-$100K | |||||
| Over $100K | |||||
| Total | |||||
| Percentage Environmental Contributions By Income Level | |||||
| Income | |||||
| Level: | 1990 | 1995 | 2000 | 2005 | 2010 |
| $0-$20K | |||||
| $21-$40K | |||||
| $41-$70K | |||||
| $71-$100K | |||||
| Over $100K | |||||
PART B - Budget Analysis
| Global River Conservancy | |||||
| Survey Budget Analysis | |||||
| Basic Information: | |||||
| Standard Deviation: | Wage Rate: | /hr | |||
| Z(alpha = 0.01): | Office Rent: | /day | |||
| Tolerance: +/- | Phone Rental: | /day | |||
| Average time per call: | minutes | Days for Survey: | |||
| Calling Shift: | hrs | Training Costs: | /person | ||
| Sample size calculations | |||||
| based on above estimates : | n = | ||||
| Call calculations: | |||||
| Number of | Percent of | Regional | Regional | Number of | |
| Region | Households | Total | Sample size | Response Rate | Calls |
| A | 156315 | 0.35 | |||
| B | 84253 | 0.31 | |||
| C | 101999 | 0.32 | |||
| D | 132564 | 0.26 | |||
| E | 126324 | 0.33 | |||
| Totals: | |||||
| Budget Calculations: | |||||
| Cost per | Regional | Call Time by | |||
| Region | Call | Call Costs | Region (hrs) | ||
| A | $1.05 | ||||
| B | $1.34 | ||||
| C | $1.42 | ||||
| D | $1.44 | ||||
| E | $1.37 | ||||
| Totals: | |||||
| Shifts Required: | |||||
| Employees/Phones Required: | |||||
| Expenses: | |||||
| Wages: | |||||
| Training: | |||||
| Calls: | |||||
| Phone Rent: | |||||
| Office Rent: | |||||
| Misc. Supplies | |||||
| Total Expenses: | |||||
PART C - Survey Analysis
| Global River Conservancy | ||||||
| Survey Data Analysis | ||||||
| Total Survey Sample Size: | ||||||
| *** Frequency Distribution for Radio Responses *** | ||||||
| Cumulative | ||||||
| Radio¥ | Frequency | Frequency | ||||
| $0 | 43 | |||||
| $1 | to | $50 | 139 | |||
| $51 | to | $100 | 253 | |||
| $101 | to | $500 | 96 | |||
| More Than | $500 | 28 | ||||
| Total Radio Responses = | ||||||
| Median Donation for Radio = | Percent of Total Sample = | |||||
| *** Frequency Distribution for Newspaper Responses *** | ||||||
| Cumulative | ||||||
| Newspaper¥ | Frequency | Frequency | ||||
| $0 | 62 | |||||
| $1 | to | $50 | 165 | |||
| $51 | to | $100 | 338 | |||
| $101 | to | $500 | 127 | |||
| More Than | $500 | 46 | ||||
| Total Newspaper Responses = | ||||||
| Median Donation for Newspaper = | Percent of Total Sample = | |||||
| *** Frequency Distribution for Cable TV Responses *** | ||||||
| Cumulative | ||||||
| Cable TV¥ | Frequency | Frequency | ||||
| $0 | 62 | |||||
| $1 | to | $50 | 171 | |||
| $51 | to | $100 | 344 | |||
| $101 | to | $500 | 117 | |||
| More Than | $500 | 47 | ||||
| Total Cable TV responses = | ||||||
| Median Donation for Cable TV = | Percent of Total Sample = | |||||
| *** Frequency Distribution for Direct Mail Responses *** | ||||||
| Direct | Cumulative | |||||
| Mail¥ | Frequency | Frequency | ||||
| $0 | 71 | |||||
| $1 | to | $50 | 186 | |||
| $51 | to | $100 | 362 | |||
| $101 | to | $500 | 127 | |||
| More Than | $500 | 45 | ||||
| Total Direct Mail Responses = | ||||||
| Median Donation for Direct Mail = | Percent of Total Sample = | |||||
| *** Frequency Distribution for Telemarketing Responses *** | ||||||
| Tele- | Cumulative | |||||
| Marketing¥ | Frequency | Frequency | ||||
| $0 | 89 | |||||
| $1 | to | $50 | 193 | |||
| $51 | to | $100 | 348 | |||
| $101 | to | $500 | 102 | |||
| More Than | $500 | 38 | ||||
| Total Telemarketing Responses = | ||||||
| Median Donation for Telemarketing = | Percent of Total Sample = | |||||
| *** Expected Proceeds Calculations *** | ||||||
| Target Households = | 601172 | |||||
| Cost per | Median | Households | Gross | Expected | Net | |
| 1000 | Donation | Reached | Proceeds | Cost | Proceeds | |
| Radio | $6.79 | |||||
| Newspaper | $7.65 | |||||
| Cable TV | $7.38 | |||||
| Direct Mail | $4.50 | |||||
| Telemarketing | $4.75 | |||||
| ¥ Individual media for which responses to the donation question | ||||||
| have been tabulated for each frequency distribution. |