Intel Corporation--Optimal Financial Structure and Dividend Policy

profilevgaaju
financial_mix.pptx

Determining the Finance Mix

Learning Objectives

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Understanding the difference between risk and financial risk.

Use the technique of break-even analysis in a variety of

analytical settings.

Distinguish among the financial concepts of operating

leverage, financial leverage, and combined leverage.

Calculate the firm’s degree of operating leverage, financial

leverage, and combined leverage.

Understand the concept of an optimal capital structure.

Learning Objectives

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

Explain the main underpinnings of capital structure

theory.

Understand and be able to graph the moderate position

on capital structure importance.

Incorporate the concepts of agency costs and free cash

flow into a discussion on capital structure management.

Use the basic tools of capital structure management.

Understand how business risk and global sales impact

the multinational firm.

Slide Contents

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

Principles Used in this chapter

Risk

Break-even Analysis

Operating and Financial leverage

Planning the Financing Mix

Capital Structure Theory

Capital Structure Management (Basic Tools)

Capital Structure Management (Survey Results)

Finance and the Multinational Firm

1. Principles Used in this Chapter

Principles Used in this Chapter

• Principle 1:

– The Risk-Return Tradeoff – We Won’t Take on Additional

Risk Unless We Expect to Be Compensated With Additional

Return

• Principle 3:

– Cash-Not Profits-Is King

• Principle 7:

– The Agency Problem – Managers Won’t Work for the

Owners Unless It’s in Their Best Interest

• Principle 8:

– Taxes Bias Business Solutions

2. Risk

Risk

• The variability associated with expected revenue or

income streams. Such variability may arise due to:

– Choice of business line (business risk).

– Choice of an operating cost structure (operating risk).

– Choice of capital structure (financial risk).

Business Risk

Business Risk is the variation in the firm’s expected earnings

attributable to the industry in which the firm operates. There

are four determinants of business risk:

1. The stability of the domestic economy

2. The exposure to, and stability of, foreign economies

3. Sensitivity to the business cycle, and

4. Competitive pressures in the firm’s industry.

Operating Risk

• Operating risk is the variation in the firm’s operating

earnings that results from the firm’s cost structure

(mix of fixed and variable operating costs).

• Earnings of firms with higher proportion of fixed

operating costs are more vulnerable to change in

revenues.

Financial Risk

 Financial Risk is the variation in earnings as a

result of a firm’s financing mix or proportion of

financing that requires a fixed return.

3. Break-even Analysis

Break-even Analysis

• Break-even analysis is used to determine the

break-even quantity of a firm’s output by

examining the relationships among the firm’s cost

structure, volume of output, and profit.

• Break-even may be calculated in units or sales

dollars. Break-even point indicates the point of

sales or units at which EBIT is equal to zero.

Break-even Analysis

 Use of break-even model enables the

financial officer:

1. To determine the quantity of output that must

be sold to cover all operating costs, as distinct

from financial costs.

2. To calculate the EBIT that will be achieved at

various output levels.

Keown Martin Petty -

Chapter 12

15

Elements of Break-even Model

 Break-even analysis requires information on the

following:

1. Fixed Costs

2. Variable Costs

3. Total Revenue

4. Total Volume

 Break-even analysis requires classification of costs

into two categories:

– Fixed costs or indirect costs

– Variable costs or direct costs

• Since all costs are variable in the long-run, break-

even analysis is a short-run concept.

Fixed or Indirect Costs

• These costs do not vary in total amount as sales volume or

the quantity of output changes.

– As production volume increases, fixed costs per unit of

product falls, as fixed costs are spread over a larger and

larger quantity of output (but total remains the same).

– Fixed costs vary per unit but remain fixed in total.

– The total fixed costs are generally fixed for a specific range of

output.

Break-even Point (BEP)

• BEP = Point at which EBIT equals zero

• EBIT = (Sales price per unit) (units sold)

– [(variable cost per unit) (units sold) + (total

fixed cost)]

BEP for Pierce Grain Company

Example

• Selling price = $10 per unit

• Variable cost = $6 per unit

• Fixed cost = $100,000

• BEP (Units) = Total Fixed costs

(Unit sales price – Unit variable cost)

= 100000/4 = 25000 units

4. Operating and Financial Leverage

Operating Leverage

• Operating leverage measures the sensitivity of the

firm’s EBIT to fluctuation in sales, when a firm has

fixed operating costs.

• If the firm has no fixed operating costs, EBIT will

change in proportion to the change in sales.

Operating Leverage

• Operating Leverage (OL) = % change in EBIT

% change in sales

• Thus % change in EBIT

= OL X % change in sales

Where :

% change in EBIT = EBITt1 – EBITt / EBITt

% Change in sales =Salest1 – Salest / Salest

Operating Leverage

 Example: If a company has an operating leverage of 6,

then what is the change in EBIT if sales increase by 5%?

Percentage change in EBIT = Operating leverage X

Percentage change in sales = 5% x 6 = 30%

Thus if the firm increases sales by 5%, EBIT will increase by

30%

Operating Leverage

 Operating leverage is present when:

– Percentage change in EBIT / Percentage change in

sales > 1.00

• The greater the firm’s degree of operating

leverage, the more the profits will vary in

response to change in sales.

Operating Leverage for

Pierce Grain

Operating Leverage for

Pierce Grain

• Due to operating leverage, even though the sales

increase by only 20%, EBIT increases by 120%. (and

vice versa, if sales dropped by 20%, EBIT will fall by

120%; see next slide)

• If Pierce had no operating leverage (i.e. all of its

operating costs were variable), then the increase in

EBIT would have been in proportion to increase in

sales, i.e. 20%.

Financial Leverage

• Financial leverage is financing a portion of the firm’s

assets with securities bearing a fixed rate of return in

hopes of increasing the return to the common

stockholders.

• Thus, the decision to use preferred stock or debt exposes

the common stockholders to financial risk.

• Variability of EBIT is magnified by firm’s use of financial

leverage.

Three financing plans for Pierce

Grain

Three financing plans for Pierce

Grain

• Plan A: 0% debt – no financial risk

• Plan B: 25% debt – moderate financial risk

• Plan C: 40% debt – higher financial risk

• See next slide for impact of financial leverage on

earnings per share (EPS). The use of financial

leverage magnifies the impact of changes in EBIT on

earnings per share.

• A firm is employing financial leverage and

exposing its owners to financial risk when:

– Percentage change in EPS divided by Percentage

change in EBIT is greater than 1.00

Combined Leverage

• Operating leverage causes changes in sales revenues to

cause even greater changes in EBIT; furthermore, changes

in EBIT due to financial leverage create large variations in

both EPS and total earnings available to common

shareholders.

• Not surprisingly, combining operating and financial leverage

causes rather large variations in EPS

Combined Leverage

• Combined Leverage = Percentage change in

EPS/Percentage change in sales

• Or combined leverage = Operating Leverage X

Financial Leverage

• See table 12-6

Combining Operating and

Financial Leverage

5. Planning the Financing Mix

Capital Structure

• Financial Structure

– Mix of all items that appear on the right-hand side of

the company’s balance sheet

• Capital Structure

– Mix of the long-term sources of funds used by the firm

– Financial Structure – Current liabilities = Capital

Structure

Financial Structure

 Designing a prudent financial structure requires

answers to the following:

1. How should a firm best divide its total fund sources

between short- and long-term components?

2. Capital structure management: In what proportions

relative to the total should the various forms of

permanent financing be utilized?

• This chapter focuses on the second question.

Capital Structure Management

• A firm should mix the permanent sources of funds in

a manner that will maximize the company’s stock

price, or minimize the cost of capital.

• A proper mix of funds sources is called the “optimal

capital structure”.

6. Capital Structure Theory

Capital Structure Theory

• Theory focuses on the effect of financial leverage

on the overall cost of capital to the enterprise.

• In other words, Can the firm affect its overall cost

of funds, either favorably or unfavorably, by

varying the mixture of financing used?

• Firms strive to minimize the cost of using financial

capital.

M&M’s Independence Hypothesis

• According to Modigliani & Miller, neither the

total value of the firm nor the cost of capital is

influenced by the firm's capital structure. In

other words, the financing decision is

irrelevant!

• Their conclusions were based on restrictive

assumptions (such as no taxes, perfect or

efficient markets).

M&M’s Independence Hypothesis

• Figure 12-5 that shows that firm’s value

remains the same , despite the differences in

financing mix.

M&M’s Independence Hypothesis

• Figure 12-6 shows that the firm’s cost of

capital remains constant , although cost of

equity rises with increased leverage.

Extensions to Independence

Hypothesis

• How is the capital structure decision affected

when we consider:

– Tax benefit on interest expense

– Possibility of financial distress

– Agency cost of debt

Impact of taxes on capital

structure

• Interest expense is tax deductible.

• Because interest is deductible, the use of debt

financing should result in higher total market value

for firms outstanding securities.

• Tax Shield benefit = rd(m)(t)

r = rate, m = principal, t = marginal tax rate

• Interest on debt is tax deductible.

==> higher the interest expense,

lower

the taxes

• Thus, one would suggest that firms should maximize

Debt … indeed, firms should go for 100% debt to

maximize tax shield benefits!!

• But, we generally do not see 100% debt in the real

world. Why not?

• Two possible explanations are:

– Bankruptcy costs

– Agency costs

Impact of Bankruptcy on Capital

structure

• The Probability that a firm will be unable to meet its debt

obligations increases with debt. Thus probability of

bankruptcy (and hence costs) increases with increased

leverage. Threat of financial distress causes the cost of debt to

rise.

• As financial conditions weaken, expected costs of default can

be large enough to outweigh the tax shield benefit of debt

financing.

Impact of Bankruptcy on Capital

structure

• So higher debt does not lead to higher value. After a point

debt reduces the value of the firm to shareholders.

• This explains a tendency to restrain from maximizing the use

of debt.

• Debt capacity indicates the maximum proportion of debt the

firm can include in its capital structure and still maintain its

lowest composite cost of capital (see figure 12-7).

Agency Costs

• To ensure that agent-managers act in shareholders best

interest, firms must:

1. Have proper incentives

2. Monitor decisions

-bonding the managers

-auditing financial statements

-structuring the organization in unique ways that limit useful managerial

decisions

-reviewing the costs and benefits of management perquisites

• The costs of the incentives and monitoring must be borne

by the stockholders.

Impact of Agency Costs on Capital

Structur

• Capital structure management also gives rise to agency costs.

Bondholders are principals as essentially they have given a loan

to the corporation, that is owned by shareholders.

• Agency problems stem from conflicts of interest between

stockholders and bondholders. For example, pursuing risky

projects may benefit stockholders, but may not be appreciated

by bondholders

• Bondholders greatest fear is default by corporation or misuse

of funds leading to financial distress.

Impact of Agency Costs on

Capital Structure

• Agency costs may be minimized by agreeing to include

several protective covenants in the bond contract

• Bond covenants impose costs (such as periodic disclosure)

and impose constraints (on the type of project

management can undertake, Collateral, distribution of

dividends, and limits on further borrowing)

• Thus agency costs of debt reduces the attractiveness of

debt and decreases the value of the firm.

• Figure 12-8 indicates the trade-offs. For example,

increasing the protective covenants will reduce the

interest cost but increase the monitoring cost (which

is eventually borne by the shareholders).

Summary of Capital Structure

Theory

• Market value of levered firm

= Market value of unlevered firm

+ Present value of tax shields

- Present value of Financial distress costs

- Present value of agency costs

7. Capital Structure Management

WACC

70%

0

80%

90%

100%

20%

30%

40%

50%

10%

60%

63

WACC and Debt Ratios

Weighted Average Cost of Capital and Debt Ratios

Debt Ratio

9.80%

9.60%

9.40%

11.40%

11.20%

11.00%

10.80%

10.60%

10.40%

10.20%

10.00%

Current Cost of Capital: Disney

• Equity

– Cost of Equity =

– Market Value of Equity =

– Equity/(Debt+Equity ) =

• Debt

– After-tax Cost of debt =

– Market Value of Debt =

– Debt/(Debt +Equity) =

13.85%

$50.88 Billion

82%

7.50% (1-.36) = 4.80%

$ 11.18 Billion

18%

• Cost of Capital = 13.85%(.82)+4.80%(.18) = 12.22%

Estimating Cost of Equity

Current Beta = 1.25

Unlevered Beta = 1.09

Market premium = 5.5%

T.Bond Rate = 7.00%

t=36%

Debt Ratio

0%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

D/E Ratio

1.09

11%

25%

43%

67%

100%

150%

233%

400%

900%

Beta

13.00%

1.17

1.27

1.39

1.56

1.79

2.14

2.72

3.99

8.21

Cost of Equity

13.43%

13.96%

14.65%

15.56%

16.85%

18.77%

21.97%

28.95%

52.14%

Estimating Cost of Debt

Step

1

2

D/(D+E)

D/E

$ Debt

EBITDA

Depreciation

EBIT

$5,559

Interest

Taxable Income

Tax

0.00%

0.00%

$0

$6,693

$1,134

$5,559

$0

$5,559

$2,001

10.00%

11.11%

$6,207

$6,693

$1,134

$447

$5,112

$1,840

Calculation Details

= [D/(D+E)]/( 1 -[D/(D+E)])

= [D/(D+E)]* Firm Value

Kept constant as debt changes.

= Interest Rate * $ Debt

= EBIT - Interest

= Tax Rate * Taxable Income

Net Income $3,558

$3,272

= Taxable Income - Tax

Pre-tax Int. cov

12.44

= EBIT/Int. Exp

3

Likely Rating AAA

AAA

Based upon interest coverage

4

Interest Rate

7.20%

7.20%

Interest rate for given rating

5

Eff. Tax Rate 36.00%

After-tax kd 4.61%

36.00%

4.61%

See notes on effective tax rate

=Interest Rate * (1 - Tax Rate)

Firm Value = 50,888+11,180= $62,068

66

The Ratings Table

If Interest Coverage

Ratio is

> 8.50

6.50 - 8.50

5.50 - 6.50

4.25 - 5.50

3.00 - 4.25

2.50 - 3.00

2.00 - 2.50

1.75 - 2.00

1.50 - 1.75

1.25 - 1.50

0.80 - 1.25

0.65 - 0.80

0.20 - 0.65

< 0.20

Estimated

Bond Rating

AAA

AA

A+

A

A–

BBB

BB

B+

B

B –

CCC

CC

C

D

Default

spread

0.20%

0.50%

0.80%

1.00%

1.25%

1.50%

2.00%

2.50%

3.25%

4.25%

5.00%

6.00%

7.50%

10.00%

A Test: Can you do the 20% level?

20.00%

Second Iteration

D/(D+E)

D/E

$ Debt

EBITDA

Depreciation

0.00%

0.00%

$0

$6,693

$1,134

10.00%

11.11%

$6,207

$6,693

$1,134

EBIT $5,559

$5,559

Interest Expense

Pre-tax Int. cov

Likely Rating

Interest Rate

Eff. Tax Rate

Cost of Debt

$0

AAA

7.20%

36.00%

4.61%

$447

12.44

AAA

7.20%

36.00%

4.61%

Disney’s Cost of Capital Schedule

Debt Ratio

0.00%

10.00%

20.00%

30.00%

40.00%

50.00%

60.00%

70.00%

80.00%

90.00%

Cost of Equity

13.00%

13.43%

13.96%

14.65%

15.56%

16.85%

18.77%

21.97%

28.95%

52.14%

AT Cost of Debt

4.61%

4.61%

4.99%

5.28%

5.76%

6.56%

7.68%

7.68%

7.97%

9.42%

Cost of Capital

13.00%

12.55%

12.17%

11.84%

11.64%

11.70%

12.11%

11.97%

12.17%

13.69%

8. Capital Structure Management

(Survey Results)

The Ten Factors

A survey of 392 corporate executives reveals the

following ten factors as important determinants of

capital structure decision:

1.

Financial flexibility :

Firm’s bargaining position is better if it has choices

2.

Credit Rating:

Downgrading of credit rating will increase borrowing costs and

thus managers try to avoid anything that will trigger credit

downgrades

The Ten Factors

3.

Insufficient internal funds :

Firms follow a pecking order for raising funds – internal

funds followed by debt and then equity.

4.

Level of interest rates :

Firms tend to borrow when interest rates are low

relative to their expectations

5.

Interest tax savings

The Ten Factors

6.

Transaction costs and fees :

Cost of issuing equity is relatively higher than debt, making

equity a less attractive source.

7.

Equity valuation :

If shares are undervalued, firms will like to issue debt, and vice

versa.

8.

Competitor:

Firms from similar businesses tend to have similar capital

structures.

The Ten Factors

9.

Bankruptcy/distress costs :

Higher existing debt will increase the likelihood of financial

distress.

10.

Customer/supplier discomfort :

High levels of debt will increase discomfort among customers

(fearing disruption in supply) and suppliers (fearing disruption in

demand and late/non payment on existing contracts).

9. Finance and the Multinational Firm

Finance and the Multinational Firm:

Business Risk and Global Sales

Business risk is both multidimensional and

international, and is affected by:

1. The sensitivity of the firm’s product demand to

general economic conditions

2. The degree of competition to which the firm is

exposed

3. Product diversification

4. Growth prospects, and

5. Global sales volumes and production output.