english - gay adoption paper Counter Argument

profileebrown2430
counter_rubric.xls

Sheet1

Counter Argument Evaluation
English 112
Name:
Criteria Points Earned Points Possible Percent Grade Comments
I. Introduction/Purpose/Focus/Clarity 15
Identifies specific issue (shows claim) that is arguable and debatable
Clear sense of purpose and audience
No digression from topic
Media-based does not omit important information
Media-based draws audience into presentation
II. Organization/Coherence 20
Logical and clear progression
Appropriate to claim development
Successful transitional/cohesive devices
Uses main and subordinate ideas
Acknowledges opposing views of the claim
Introduction and conclusion effectively related to whole
Media graphics assist and enhance overall argument
Media-based is visually appealing and contributes to message
III. Style/Writing Conventions 15
Clarity and command of academic writing conventions
Error frequency and/or type does not distract from the overall effectiveness
Few errors in grammar and mechanics
Accurate word choice
Media text is appropriate to the length and target audience
IV. Critical Thinking 20
Essay effectively addresses diverse audience
Effectively addresses most significant viewpoints
Synthesis of ideas competently conveyed
V. References 20
Sources not merely present, but contribute to the writer's purpose/focus
Sources presented in such a way as to represent others' intellectual property accurately, fairly, appropriately and consistently
Sources follow MLA or APA style of documentation consistently
VI. Meets Criteria of Assignment 10
Meets MLA or APA format guidelines; or media presentation concepts
Meets assignment criteria, 250-500 words
VII. Total 0 100 0%
NOTE: The project will not be accepted if the number and type of sources are incorrect, if the length does not meet minimum standards, and if there are no in-text citations or Works Cited/Reference page.

Sheet2

Sheet3