Statistics for Managers Assignment
Data
| ID | Sal | Compa | Mid | Age | EES | SR | G | Raise | Deg | Gen1 | Gr | |||||
| 1 | 58 | 1.017 | 57 | 34 | 85 | 8 | 0 | 5.7 | 0 | M | E | The ongoing question that the weekly assignments will focus on is: Are males and females paid the same for equal work (under the Equal Pay Act)? | ||||
| 2 | 27 | 0.870 | 31 | 52 | 80 | 7 | 0 | 3.9 | 0 | M | B | Note: to simplfy the analysis, we will assume that jobs within each grade comprise equal work. | ||||
| 3 | 34 | 1.096 | 31 | 30 | 75 | 5 | 1 | 3.6 | 1 | F | B | |||||
| 4 | 66 | 1.157 | 57 | 42 | 100 | 16 | 0 | 5.5 | 1 | M | E | The column labels in the table mean: | ||||
| 5 | 47 | 0.979 | 48 | 36 | 90 | 16 | 0 | 5.7 | 1 | M | D | ID – Employee sample number | Sal – Salary in thousands | |||
| 6 | 76 | 1.134 | 67 | 36 | 70 | 12 | 0 | 4.5 | 1 | M | F | Age – Age in years | EES – Appraisal rating (Employee evaluation score) | |||
| 7 | 41 | 1.025 | 40 | 32 | 100 | 8 | 1 | 5.7 | 1 | F | C | SER – Years of service | G – Gender (0 = male, 1 = female) | |||
| 8 | 23 | 1.000 | 23 | 32 | 90 | 9 | 1 | 5.8 | 1 | F | A | Mid – salary grade midpoint | Raise – percent of last raise | |||
| 9 | 77 | 1.149 | 67 | 49 | 100 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 1 | M | F | Grade – job/pay grade | Deg (0= BS\BA 1 = MS) | |||
| 10 | 22 | 0.956 | 23 | 30 | 80 | 7 | 1 | 4.7 | 1 | F | A | Gen1 (Male or Female) | Compa - salary divided by midpoint | |||
| 11 | 23 | 1.000 | 23 | 41 | 100 | 19 | 1 | 4.8 | 1 | F | A | |||||
| 12 | 60 | 1.052 | 57 | 52 | 95 | 22 | 0 | 4.5 | 0 | M | E | |||||
| 13 | 42 | 1.050 | 40 | 30 | 100 | 2 | 1 | 4.7 | 0 | F | C | |||||
| 14 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 32 | 90 | 12 | 1 | 6 | 1 | F | A | |||||
| 15 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 32 | 80 | 8 | 1 | 4.9 | 1 | F | A | |||||
| 16 | 47 | 1.175 | 40 | 44 | 90 | 4 | 0 | 5.7 | 0 | M | C | |||||
| 17 | 69 | 1.210 | 57 | 27 | 55 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | F | E | |||||
| 18 | 36 | 1.161 | 31 | 31 | 80 | 11 | 1 | 5.6 | 0 | F | B | |||||
| 19 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 32 | 85 | 1 | 0 | 4.6 | 1 | M | A | |||||
| 20 | 34 | 1.096 | 31 | 44 | 70 | 16 | 1 | 4.8 | 0 | F | B | |||||
| 21 | 76 | 1.134 | 67 | 43 | 95 | 13 | 0 | 6.3 | 1 | M | F | |||||
| 22 | 57 | 1.187 | 48 | 48 | 65 | 6 | 1 | 3.8 | 1 | F | D | |||||
| 23 | 23 | 1.000 | 23 | 36 | 65 | 6 | 1 | 3.3 | 0 | F | A | |||||
| 24 | 50 | 1.041 | 48 | 30 | 75 | 9 | 1 | 3.8 | 0 | F | D | |||||
| 25 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 41 | 70 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | M | A | |||||
| 26 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 22 | 95 | 2 | 1 | 6.2 | 0 | F | A | |||||
| 27 | 40 | 1.000 | 40 | 35 | 80 | 7 | 0 | 3.9 | 1 | M | C | |||||
| 28 | 75 | 1.119 | 67 | 44 | 95 | 9 | 1 | 4.4 | 0 | F | F | |||||
| 29 | 72 | 1.074 | 67 | 52 | 95 | 5 | 0 | 5.4 | 0 | M | F | |||||
| 30 | 49 | 1.020 | 48 | 45 | 90 | 18 | 0 | 4.3 | 0 | M | D | |||||
| 31 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 29 | 60 | 4 | 1 | 3.9 | 1 | F | A | |||||
| 32 | 28 | 0.903 | 31 | 25 | 95 | 4 | 0 | 5.6 | 0 | M | B | |||||
| 33 | 64 | 1.122 | 57 | 35 | 90 | 9 | 0 | 5.5 | 1 | M | E | |||||
| 34 | 28 | 0.903 | 31 | 26 | 80 | 2 | 0 | 4.9 | 1 | M | B | |||||
| 35 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 23 | 90 | 4 | 1 | 5.3 | 0 | F | A | |||||
| 36 | 23 | 1.000 | 23 | 27 | 75 | 3 | 1 | 4.3 | 0 | F | A | |||||
| 37 | 22 | 0.956 | 23 | 22 | 95 | 2 | 1 | 6.2 | 0 | F | A | |||||
| 38 | 56 | 0.982 | 57 | 45 | 95 | 11 | 0 | 4.5 | 0 | M | E | |||||
| 39 | 35 | 1.129 | 31 | 27 | 90 | 6 | 1 | 5.5 | 0 | F | B | |||||
| 40 | 25 | 1.086 | 23 | 24 | 90 | 2 | 0 | 6.3 | 0 | M | A | |||||
| 41 | 43 | 1.075 | 40 | 25 | 80 | 5 | 0 | 4.3 | 0 | M | C | |||||
| 42 | 24 | 1.043 | 23 | 32 | 100 | 8 | 1 | 5.7 | 1 | F | A | |||||
| 43 | 77 | 1.149 | 67 | 42 | 95 | 20 | 1 | 5.5 | 0 | F | F | |||||
| 44 | 60 | 1.052 | 57 | 45 | 90 | 16 | 0 | 5.2 | 1 | M | E | |||||
| 45 | 55 | 1.145 | 48 | 36 | 95 | 8 | 1 | 5.2 | 1 | F | D | |||||
| 46 | 65 | 1.140 | 57 | 39 | 75 | 20 | 0 | 3.9 | 1 | M | E | |||||
| 47 | 62 | 1.087 | 57 | 37 | 95 | 5 | 0 | 5.5 | 1 | M | E | |||||
| 48 | 65 | 1.140 | 57 | 34 | 90 | 11 | 1 | 5.3 | 1 | F | E | |||||
| 49 | 60 | 1.052 | 57 | 41 | 95 | 21 | 0 | 6.6 | 0 | M | E | |||||
| 50 | 66 | 1.157 | 57 | 38 | 80 | 12 | 0 | 4.6 | 0 | M | E |
Week 1
| Week 1. | Describing the data. | ||
| 1. Using the Excel Analysis ToolPak function descriptive statistics, generate descriptive statistics for the salary data. | |||
| Which variables does this function not work properly for, even though we have some excel generated results? | |||
| 2. Sort the data by Gen or Gen 1 (into males and females) and find the mean and standard deviation for each gender for the following variables: | |||
| sal, compa, age, sr and raise. | Use the descriptive stats function for one gender and the Fx functions (average and stdev) for the other. | ||
| 3. What is the probability distribution table for a: | |||
| a. Randomly selected person being a male in a specific grade? | |||
| b. Randomly selected person being in a specific grade? | |||
| 4. Find: | |||
| a. The z score for each male salary, based on only the male salaries. | |||
| b. The z score for each female salary, based on only the female salaries. | |||
| 5. Repeat question 4 for compa for each gender. | |||
| 6. What conclusions can you make about the issue of male and female pay equality? Are all of the results consistent? If not, why not? |
Week 2
| Week 2 | Testing means | |||||
| 1 | Is either the male or female salary equal to the overall mean salary? | (Two hypotheses tests - 1 sample tests) | ||||
| 2 | Are the male and female salaries statistically equal to each other? | |||||
| 3 | Are the male and female compas equal to each other? | |||||
| 4. If the salary and compa mean tests in questions 3 and 4 provide different equality results, | ||||||
| which would be more appropriate to use in answering the question about salary equity? Why? | ||||||
| 5. What other information would you like to know to answer the question about salary equity between the genders? Why? |
Week 3
| Week 3 | ||||||
| 1. Is the average salary the same for each of the grade levels? (Assume equal variance, and use the analysis toolpak function ANOVA.) | ||||||
| Set up the input table/range to use as follows: Put all of the salary values for each grade under the appropriate grade label. | ||||||
| A | B | C | D | E | F | |
| 2. The factorial ANOVA with only 2 variables can be done with the Analysis ToolPak function 2-Way ANOVA with replication. Set up a data input table like the following: | ||||||
| Grade | ||||||
| Gender | A | B | C | D | E | F |
| M | ||||||
| F | ||||||
| For each empty cell randomly pick a male or female salary from each grade. | ||||||
| Interpret the results. Are the average salaries for each gender (listed as sample) equal? | ||||||
| Are the average salaries for each grade (listed as column) equal? | ||||||
| 3. Repeat question 2 for the compa values. | ||||||
| Grade | ||||||
| Gender | A | B | C | D | E | F |
| M | ||||||
| F | ||||||
| For each empty cell randomly pick a male or female salary from each grade. | ||||||
| Interpret the results. Are the average compas for each gender (listed as sample) equal? | ||||||
| Are the average compas for each grade (listed as column) equal? | ||||||
| 4. Pick any other variable you are interested in and do a simple 2-way ANOVA without replication. Why did you pick this variable and what do the results show? | ||||||
| 5. What are your conclusions about salary equity now? |
Week 4
| Week 4 | Confidence Intervals and Chi Square (CHs 11 - 12) | Q1 | Q2 | ||||||||||||||||
| Let's look at some other factors that might influence pay. | Gr | Deg | Gen1 | Sal | |||||||||||||||
| A | 0 | F | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
| 1. Is the probability of having a graduate degree independent of the grade the employee is in? | A | 0 | F | 41 | |||||||||||||||
| C | 0 | F | 77 | ||||||||||||||||
| 2. Construct a 95% confidence interval on the mean service for each gender? Do they intersect? | C | 0 | F | 55 | |||||||||||||||
| D | 1 | M | 77 | ||||||||||||||||
| 3. Are males and females distributed across grades in a similar pattern? | D | 1 | M | 60 | |||||||||||||||
| 4. Do 95% confidence intervals on the mean length of service for each gender intersect? | |||||||||||||||||||
| 5. How do you interpret these results in light of our equity question? |
Week 5
| Week 5 Correlation and Regression | |
| 1. Create a correlation table for the variables in our data set. (Use analysis ToolPak function Correlation.) | |
| 2. Create a multiple regression equation (using the Analysis ToolPak function Regression) to predict either salary or compa using the mid | |
| (a substitute variable for grade level), age, ees, sr, raise, and deg variables. (Note: since salary and compa are different ways of | |
| expressing an employee’s salary, we do not want to have both used in the same regression.) | |
| 3. Based on all of your results to date, is gender a factor in the pay practices of this company? Why or why not? | |
| 4. In looking at equal pay issues across an entire company, which is a better variable to use – compa or salary? Why? | |
| 5. Why did the single factor tests and analysis (such as t and single factor ANOVA tests on salary equality) not provide a complete answer to our salary equality question? | |
| What outcomes in your life or work might benefit from a multiple regression examination rather than a simpler one varable test? |