homework for shahimermaid
*
Chapter 2
Diversification and Risky Asset Allocation
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
36.pdf
VALUATION AND MANAGEMENT
Investments
JORDAN MILLER DOLVIN YÜCE
third canadian edition
fundamentals of
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Learning Objectives
To get the most out of this chapter,
spread your study time across:
1. How to calculate expected returns and variances for a security.
2. How to calculate expected returns and variances for a portfolio.
3. The importance of portfolio diversification.
4. The efficient frontier and the importance of asset allocation.
*
*
*
*
Diversification
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- Intuitively, we all know that if you hold many investments
- Through time, some will increase in value
- Through time, some will decrease in value
- It is unlikely that their values will all change in the same way
- Diversification has a profound effect on portfolio return and portfolio risk.
- But, exactly how does diversification work?
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Diversification and Asset Allocation
- Our goal in this chapter is to examine the role of diversification and asset allocation in investing.
- In the early 1950s, professor Harry Markowitz was the first to examine the role and impact of diversification.
- Based on his work, we will see how diversification works, and we can be sure that we have “efficiently diversified portfolios.”
- An efficiently diversified portfolio is one that has the highest expected return, given its risk.
- You must be aware that diversification concerns expected returns.
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Expected Returns
- Expected return is the “weighted average” return on a risky asset, from today to some future date. The formula is:
- To calculate an expected return, you must first:
- Decide on the number of possible economic scenarios that might occur.
- Estimate how well the security will perform in each scenario, and
- Assign a probability, ps, to each scenario.
- (BTW, finance professors call these economic scenarios, “states.”)
- The upcoming slides show how the expected return formula is used when there are two states.
- Note that the “states” are equally likely to occur in this example.
- BUT! They do not have to be equally likely--they can have different probabilities of occurring.
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Expected Return
- Suppose:
- There are two stocks:
- Starcents
- Jpod
- We are looking at a period of one year.
- Investors agree that the expected return:
- for Starcents is 25 percent
- for Jpod is 20 percent
- Why would anyone want to hold Jpod shares when Starcents is expected to have a higher return?
*
*
*
*
Expected Return
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- The answer depends on risk
- Starcents is expected to return 25 percent
- But the realized return on Starcents could be significantly higher or lower than 25 percent
- Similarly, the realized return on Jpod could be significantly higher or lower than 20 percent.
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Calculating Expected Returns
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Expected Risk Premium
- Recall:
- Suppose risk free investments have an 8% return. If so,
- The expected risk premium on Jpod is 12%
- The expected risk premium on Starcents is 17%
- This expected risk premium is simply the difference between
- The expected return on the risky asset in question and
- The certain return on a risk-free investment
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Calculating the Variance of Expected Returns
- The variance of expected returns is calculated using this formula:
- This formula is not as difficult as it appears.
- This formula says:
- add up the squared deviations of each return from its expected return
- after it has been multiplied by the probability of observing a particular economic state (denoted by “s”).
- The standard deviation is simply the square root of the variance.
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Example: Calculating Expected Returns and Variances: Equal State Probabilities
Note that the second spreadsheet is only for Starcents. What would you get for Jpod?
*
Sheet1
| Calculating Expected Returns: | |||||||
| Starcents: | Jpod: | ||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | ||
| Return if | Return if | ||||||
| State of | Probability of | State | Product: | State | Product: | ||
| Economy | State of Economy | Occurs | (2) x (3) | Occurs | (2) x (5) | ||
| Recession | 0.50 | -0.20 | -0.10 | 0.30 | 0.15 | ||
| Boom | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.05 | ||
| Sum: | 1.00 | E(Ret): | 0.25 | E(Ret): | 0.20 | ||
| Calculating Variance of Expected Returns: | |||||||
| Starcents: | |||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| Return if | |||||||
| State of | Probability of | State | Expected | Difference: | Squared: | Product: | |
| Economy | State of Economy | Occurs | Return: | (3) - (4) | (5) x (5) | (2) x (6) | |
| Recession | 0.50 | -0.20 | 0.25 | -0.45 | 0.2025 | 0.10125 | |
| Boom | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.25 | 0.45 | 0.2025 | 0.10125 | |
| Sum: | 1.00 | Sum = the Variance: | 0.20250 | ||||
| Standard Deviation: | 0.45 | ||||||
| Jmart: | |||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |
| Return if | |||||||
| State of | Probability of | State | Expected | Difference: | Squared: | Product: | |
| Economy | State of Economy | Occurs | Return: | (3) - (4) | (5) x (5) | (2) x (6) | |
| Recession | 0.50 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.10 | 0.0100 | 0.00500 | |
| Boom | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.20 | -0.10 | 0.0100 | 0.00500 | |
| Sum: | 1.00 | Sum is Variance: | 0.01000 | ||||
| Standard Deviation: | 0.10 |
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Expected Returns and Variances, Starcents and Jpod
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Portfolios
- Portfolios are groups of assets, such as stocks and bonds, that are held by an investor.
- One convenient way to describe a portfolio is by listing the proportion of the total value of the portfolio that is invested into each asset.
- These proportions are called portfolio weights.
- Portfolio weights are sometimes expressed in percentages.
- However, in calculations, make sure you use proportions (i.e., decimals).
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Portfolios: Expected Returns
- The expected return on a portfolio is a linear combination, or weighted average, of the expected returns on the assets in that portfolio.
- The formula, for “n” assets, is:
In the formula: E(RP) = expected portfolio return
wi = portfolio weight for portfolio asset i
E(Ri) = expected return for portfolio asset i
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Example: Calculating Portfolio Expected Returns
Note that the portfolio weight in Jpod = 1 – portfolio weight in Starcents.
*
Sheet1
| Calculating Expected Portfolio Returns: | |||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
| Starcents | Starcents | Jpod | Jpod | Portfolio | |||||
| Return if | Portfolio | Contribution | Return if | Portfolio | Contribution | Return | |||
| State of | Prob. | State | Weight | Product: | State | Weight | Product: | Sum: | Product: |
| Economy | of State | Occurs | in Starcents: | (3) x (4) | Occurs | in Jpod: | (6) x (7) | (5) + (8) | (2) x (9) |
| Recession | 0.50 | -0.20 | 0.50 | -0.10 | 0.30 | 0.50 | 0.15 | 0.05 | 0.025 |
| Boom | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.50 | 0.35 | 0.10 | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.200 |
| Sum: | 1.00 | Sum is Expected Portfolio Return: | 0.225 | ||||||
| Calculating Variance of Expected Portfolio Returns: | |||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |||
| Return if | |||||||||
| State of | Prob. | State | Expected | Difference: | Squared: | Product: | |||
| Economy | of State | Occurs: | Return: | (3) - (4) | (5) x (5) | (2) x (6) | |||
| Recession | 0.50 | 0.05 | 0.225 | -0.18 | 0.0306 | 0.01531 | |||
| Boom | 0.50 | 0.40 | 0.225 | 0.18 | 0.030625 | 0.01531 | |||
| Sum: | 1.00 | Sum is Variance: | 0.03063 | ||||||
| Standard Deviation: | 0.175 |
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Variance of Portfolio Expected Returns
- Note: Unlike returns, portfolio variance is generally not a simple weighted average of the variances of the assets in the portfolio.
- If there are “n” states, the formula is:
- In the formula, VAR(RP) = variance of portfolio expected return
ps = probability of state of economy, s
E(Rp,s) = expected portfolio return in state s
E(Rp) = portfolio expected return
- Note that the formula is like the formula for the variance of the expected return of a single asset.
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Example: Calculating Variance of Portfolio Expected Returns
- It is possible to construct a portfolio of risky assets with zero portfolio variance! What? How? (Open this spreadsheet, scroll up, and set the weight in Starcents to 2/11ths.)
- What happens when you use .40 as the weight in Starcents?
*
Sheet1
| Calculating Expected Portfolio Returns: | |||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) |
| Starcents | Starcents | Jpod | Jpod | Portfolio | |||||
| Return if | Portfolio | Contribution | Return if | Portfolio | Contribution | Return | |||
| State of | Prob. | State | Weight | Product: | State | Weight | Product: | Sum: | Product: |
| Economy | of State | Occurs | in Starcents: | (3) x (4) | Occurs | in Jpod: | (6) x (7) | (5) + (8) | (2) x (9) |
| Recession | 0.50 | -0.20 | 0.18 | -0.04 | 0.30 | 0.82 | 0.25 | 0.21 | 0.105 |
| Boom | 0.50 | 0.70 | 0.18 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.82 | 0.08 | 0.21 | 0.105 |
| Sum: | 1.00 | Sum is Expected Portfolio Return: | 0.209 | ||||||
| Calculating Variance of Expected Portfolio Returns: | |||||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | |||
| Return if | |||||||||
| State of | Prob. | State | Expected | Difference: | Squared: | Product: | |||
| Economy | of State | Occurs: | Return: | (3) - (4) | (5) x (5) | (2) x (6) | |||
| Recession | 0.50 | 0.209 | 0.209 | 0.00 | 0.0000 | 0.00000 | |||
| Boom | 0.50 | 0.209 | 0.209 | 0.00 | 0 | 0.00000 | |||
| Sum: | 1.00 | Sum is Variance: | 0.00000 | ||||||
| Standard Deviation: | 0.000 |
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Diversification and Risks
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Diversification and Risk
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
The Fallacy of Time Diversification
- Young people are often told that they should hold a large percent of their portfolio in stocks.
- The advice could be correct, but often the typical argument used to support this advice is incorrect.
- The Typical Argument: Even though stocks are more volatile, over time, the volatility “cancels out.”
- Sounds logical, but the typical argument is incorrect.
- This argument is the fallacy of time diversification fallacy
- How can such a plausible argument be incorrect?
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
The Fallacy of Time Diversification
- How can such logical-sounding advice be bad?
- You might remember from your statistics class that we can add variances.
- This fact means that an annual variance grows each year by multiplying the annual variance by the number of years.
- Standard deviations cannot be added together: An annual standard deviation grows each year by the square root of the number of years.
- As we showed earlier in the chapter, a randomly selected portfolio of large-cap stocks has an annual standard deviation of about 20%.
- If we held this portfolio for 16 years, the standard deviation would be about 80 percent, which is 20 percent multiplied by the square root of 16.
- Bottom line: Volatility increases over time—volatility does not “cancel out” over time.
- Investing in equity has a greater chance of having an extremely large value AND increases the probability of ending with a really low value.
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
The Very Definition of Risk—A Wider Range of Possible Outcomes from Holding Equity
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
So, Should Younger Investors Put a High Percent of Their Money into Equity?
- The answer is probably still yes, but for logically sound reasons that differ from the reasoning underlying the fallacy of time diversification.
- If you are young and your portfolio suffers a steep decline in a particular year, what could you do?
- You could make up for this loss by changing your work habits (e.g., your type of job, hours, second job).
- People approaching retirement have little future earning power, so a major loss in their portfolio will have a much greater impact on their wealth.
- Thus, the portfolios of young people should contain relatively more equity (i.e., risk).
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Why Diversification Works
- Correlation: The tendency of the returns on two assets to move together. Imperfect correlation is the key reason why diversification reduces portfolio risk as measured by the portfolio standard deviation.
- Positively correlated assets tend to move up and down together.
- Negatively correlated assets tend to move in opposite directions.
- Imperfect correlation, positive or negative, is why diversification reduces portfolio risk.
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Why Diversification Works
- The correlation coefficient is denoted by Corr(RA, RB) or simply, A,B.
- The correlation coefficient measures correlation and ranges from -1 to 1:
| -1 | (perfect negative correlation) |
| 0 | (uncorrelated) |
| +1 | (perfect positive correlation) |
*
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Why Diversification Works
*
*
*
Why Diversification Works
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
*
Why Diversification Works
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
*
Calculating Portfolio Risk
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- For a portfolio of two assets, A and B, the variance of the return on the portfolio is:
Where: xA = portfolio weight of asset A
xB = portfolio weight of asset B
such that xA + xB = 1.
(Important: Recall Correlation Definition!)
*
*
The Importance of Asset Allocation
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- Suppose that as a very conservative, risk-averse investor, you decide to invest all of your money in a bond mutual fund. Very conservative, indeed?
Uh, is this decision a wise one?
*
*
Correlation and Diversification
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
*
Correlation and Diversification
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- The various combinations of risk and return available all fall on a smooth curve.
- This curve is called an investment opportunity set, because it shows the possible combinations of risk and return available from portfolios of these two assets.
- A portfolio that offers the highest return for its level of risk is said to be an efficient portfolio.
- The undesirable portfolios are said to be dominated or inefficient.
*
*
More on Correlation and the Risk-Return Trade-Off
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
*
Example: Correlation and the
Risk-Return Trade-Off, Two Risky Assets
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Sheet1
| Expected | Standard | |
| Inputs | Return | Deviation |
| Risky Asset 1 | 14.0% | 20.0% |
| Risky Asset 2 | 8.0% | 15.0% |
| Correlation | 30.0% | |
| Percentage | ||
| in Risky | Standard | Expected |
| Asset 1 | Deviation | Return |
| -60.0% | 23.4% | 4.4% |
| -50.0% | 21.7% | 5.0% |
| -40.0% | 20.1% | 5.6% |
| -30.0% | 18.6% | 6.2% |
| -20.0% | 17.2% | 6.8% |
| -10.0% | 16.0% | 7.4% |
| 0.0% | 15.0% | 8.0% |
| 10.0% | 14.2% | 8.6% |
| 20.0% | 13.7% | 9.2% |
| 30.0% | 13.6% | 9.8% |
| 42.9% | 13.8% | 10.6% |
| 50.0% | 14.2% | 11.0% |
| 60.0% | 14.9% | 11.6% |
| 70.0% | 15.9% | 12.2% |
| 80.0% | 17.1% | 12.8% |
| 90.0% | 18.5% | 13.4% |
| 100.0% | 20.0% | 14.0% |
| 110.0% | 21.6% | 14.6% |
| 120.0% | 23.3% | 15.2% |
| 130.0% | 25.0% | 15.8% |
| 140.0% | 26.8% | 16.4% |
Sheet1
*
*
The Importance of Asset Allocation
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- We can illustrate the importance of asset allocation with 3 assets.
- How? Suppose we invest in three mutual funds:
- One that contains Foreign Stocks, F
- One that contains U.S. Stocks, S
- One that contains U.S. Bonds, B
- Figure 11.6 shows the results of calculating various expected returns and portfolio standard deviations with these three assets.
| Expected Return | Standard Deviation | |
| Foreign Stocks, F | 18% | 35% |
| U.S. Stocks, S | 12 | 22 |
| U.S. Bonds, B | 8 | 14 |
*
*
Risk and Return with Multiple Assets
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
Risk and Return with Multiple Assets
- We used these formulas for portfolio return and variance:
- But, we made a simplifying assumption. We assumed that the assets are all uncorrelated.
- If so, the portfolio variance becomes:
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
The Markowitz Efficient Frontier
- The Markowitz Efficient frontier is the set of portfolios with the maximum return for a given risk AND the minimum risk given a return.
- For the plot, the upper left-hand boundary is the Markowitz efficient frontier.
- All the other possible combinations are inefficient. That is, investors would not hold these portfolios because they could get either
- more return for a given level of risk
or
- less risk for a given level of return.
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- Investors face two problems with they form portfolios of multiple securities from different asset classes.
- These are as follows: an asset allocation problem & a security selection problem.
- The asset allocation problem involves a decision regarding what percentage should be allocated among different asset classes ( stocks, bonds, derivatives, foreign securities).
- The security selection problem involves deciding which to pick in each class and what percentage to allocate to these securities (RIM, Royal Bank, Molson).
*
Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- Professional Investors have traditionally used modern portfolio theory to help make investment decisions.
- This approach examines past returns, volatility and correlation to determine the optimum percentage of a portfolio to invest in to achieve an expected rate of return for a given level of risk.
- “Modern Portfolio theory focuses on diversifying your risk away, but the crisis has shown the limits of the approach.”
- What are the alternatives?
- How should investors be looking to construct their portfolios?
*
Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- Investors should make asset allocations that give the best chance of meeting their own unique future financial commitments, rather then simply trying to maximize risk-adjusted returns.
- Life cycle investing, takes into account the investor’s specific time horizons, something that modern portfolio theory does not take into account.
- Controlling the overall risk level of investments to make sure it is in line with risk appetite.
*
Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
*
*
Useful Internet Sites
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
- www.investopedia.com (for more on risk measures)
- www.teachmefinance.com (also contains more on risk measure)
- www.morningstar.com (measure diversification using “instant x-ray”)
- www.moneychimp.com (review modern portfolio theory)
- www.efficientfrontier.com (check out the reading list)
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Chapter Review
- Expected Returns and Variances
- Expected returns
- Calculating the variance
- Portfolios
- Portfolio weights
- Portfolio expected returns
- Portfolio variance
*
61.pdf
VALUATION AND MANAGEMENT
Investments
JORDAN MILLER DOLVIN YÜCE
third canadian edition
fundamentals of
*
*
*
Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University
Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson
Chapter Review
- Diversification and Portfolio Risk
- The principle of diversification
- The fallacy of time diversification
- Correlation and Diversification
- Why diversification works
- Calculating portfolio risk
- More on correlation and the risk-return trade-off
- The Markowitz Efficient Frontier
- Risk and return with multiple assets
*
62.pdf
VALUATION AND MANAGEMENT
Investments
JORDAN MILLER DOLVIN YÜCE
third canadian edition
fundamentals of
[
]
å
=
´
=
n
1
s
s
i,
s
i
return
p
return
expected
Rate
Riskfree
Return
Expected
Premium
Risk
Expected
-
=
(
)
[
]
å
=
-
´
=
=
n
1
s
2
s
s
2
return
expected
return
p
σ
Variance
Variance
σ
Deviation
Standard
=
=
(1)(3)(4)(5)(6)
Return ifReturn if
State ofStateProduct:StateProduct:
EconomyOccurs(2) x (3)Occurs(2) x (5)
Recession-0.20-0.100.300.15
Boom0.700.350.100.05
Sum:E(Ret):0.25E(Ret):0.20
(1)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
Return if
State ofStateExpectedDifference:Squared:Product:
EconomyOccursReturn:(3) - (4)(5) x (5)(2) x (6)
Recession-0.200.25-0.450.20250.10125
Boom0.700.250.450.20250.10125
Sum:0.20250
0.45
Calculating Expected Returns:
Starcents:Jpod:
(2)
1.00
Calculating Variance of Expected Returns:
Starcents:
(2)
Probability of
State of Economy
0.50
0.50
1.00Sum = the Variance:
Standard Deviation:
Probability of
State of Economy
0.50
0.50
(
)
(
)
[
]
å
=
´
=
n
1
i
i
i
P
R
E
w
R
E
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)
StarcentsStarcentsJpodJpodPortfolio
Return ifPortfolioContributionReturn ifPortfolioContributionReturn
State ofProb.StateWeightProduct:StateWeightProduct:Sum:Product:
Economyof State Occursin Starcents:(3) x (4)Occursin Jpod:(6) x (7)(5) + (8)(2) x (9)
Recession0.50-0.200.50-0.100.300.500.150.050.025
Boom0.500.700.500.350.100.500.050.400.200
Sum:1.000.225
Calculating Expected Portfolio Returns:
Sum is Expected Portfolio Return:
(
)
(
)
(
)
{
}
[
]
å
=
-
´
=
n
1
s
2
P
s
p,
s
P
R
E
R
E
p
R
VAR
(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)
Return if
State ofProb.StateExpectedDifference:Squared:Product:
Economyof State Occurs:Return:(3) - (4)(5) x (5)(2) x (6)
Recession0.500.2090.2090.000.00000.00000
Boom0.500.2090.2090.0000.00000
Sum:1.00Sum is Variance:0.00000
0.000Standard Deviation:
Calculating Variance of Expected Portfolio Returns:
)
R
CORR(R
σ
σ
x
2x
σ
x
σ
x
σ
B)
COV(A,
x
2x
σ
x
σ
x
σ
B
A
B
A
B
A
2
B
2
B
2
A
2
A
2
p
B
A
2
B
2
B
2
A
2
A
2
p
+
+
=
+
+
=
ExpectedStandard
InputsReturnDeviation
Risky Asset 114.0%20.0%
Risky Asset 28.0%15.0%
Correlation30.0%
Efficient Set--Two Asset Portfolio
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
0%5%10%15%20%25%30%
Standard Deviation
Expected Return
2
B
2
B
2
S
2
S
2
F
2
F
2
p
B
S
B
S
B
S
B
F
B
F
B
F
S
F
S
F
S
F
2
B
2
B
2
S
2
S
2
F
2
F
2
p
B
B
S
S
F
F
p
σ
x
σ
x
σ
x
σ
)
R
CORR(R
σ
σ
x
2x
)
R
CORR(R
σ
σ
x
2x
)
R
CORR(R
σ
σ
x
2x
σ
x
σ
x
σ
x
σ
R
x
R
x
R
x
r
+
+
=
+
+
+
+
+
=
+
+
=