homework for shahimermaid

profileWilson Li
ch02_jordan_powerpoint.ppt

*

Chapter 2

Diversification and Risky Asset Allocation

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

36.pdf

VALUATION AND MANAGEMENT

Investments

JORDAN MILLER DOLVIN YÜCE

third canadian edition

fundamentals of

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Learning Objectives


To get the most out of this chapter,
spread your study time across:

1. How to calculate expected returns and variances for a security.

2. How to calculate expected returns and variances for a portfolio.

3. The importance of portfolio diversification.

4. The efficient frontier and the importance of asset allocation.

*

*

*

*

Diversification

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • Intuitively, we all know that if you hold many investments
  • Through time, some will increase in value
  • Through time, some will decrease in value
  • It is unlikely that their values will all change in the same way
  • Diversification has a profound effect on portfolio return and portfolio risk.
  • But, exactly how does diversification work?

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Diversification and Asset Allocation

  • Our goal in this chapter is to examine the role of diversification and asset allocation in investing.
  • In the early 1950s, professor Harry Markowitz was the first to examine the role and impact of diversification.
  • Based on his work, we will see how diversification works, and we can be sure that we have “efficiently diversified portfolios.”
  • An efficiently diversified portfolio is one that has the highest expected return, given its risk.
  • You must be aware that diversification concerns expected returns.

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Expected Returns

  • Expected return is the “weighted average” return on a risky asset, from today to some future date. The formula is:
  • To calculate an expected return, you must first:
  • Decide on the number of possible economic scenarios that might occur.
  • Estimate how well the security will perform in each scenario, and
  • Assign a probability, ps, to each scenario.
  • (BTW, finance professors call these economic scenarios, “states.”)
  • The upcoming slides show how the expected return formula is used when there are two states.
  • Note that the “states” are equally likely to occur in this example.
  • BUT! They do not have to be equally likely--they can have different probabilities of occurring.

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Expected Return

  • Suppose:
  • There are two stocks:
  • Starcents
  • Jpod
  • We are looking at a period of one year.
  • Investors agree that the expected return:
  • for Starcents is 25 percent
  • for Jpod is 20 percent
  • Why would anyone want to hold Jpod shares when Starcents is expected to have a higher return?

*

*

*

*

Expected Return

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • The answer depends on risk
  • Starcents is expected to return 25 percent
  • But the realized return on Starcents could be significantly higher or lower than 25 percent
  • Similarly, the realized return on Jpod could be significantly higher or lower than 20 percent.

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Calculating Expected Returns

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Expected Risk Premium

  • Recall:


  • Suppose risk free investments have an 8% return. If so,
  • The expected risk premium on Jpod is 12%
  • The expected risk premium on Starcents is 17%
  • This expected risk premium is simply the difference between
  • The expected return on the risky asset in question and
  • The certain return on a risk-free investment

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Calculating the Variance of Expected Returns

  • The variance of expected returns is calculated using this formula:
  • This formula is not as difficult as it appears.
  • This formula says:
  • add up the squared deviations of each return from its expected return
  • after it has been multiplied by the probability of observing a particular economic state (denoted by “s”).
  • The standard deviation is simply the square root of the variance.

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Example: Calculating Expected Returns and Variances: Equal State Probabilities

Note that the second spreadsheet is only for Starcents. What would you get for Jpod?

*

Sheet1

Calculating Expected Returns:
Starcents: Jpod:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6)
Return if Return if
State of Probability of State Product: State Product:
Economy State of Economy Occurs (2) x (3) Occurs (2) x (5)
Recession 0.50 -0.20 -0.10 0.30 0.15
Boom 0.50 0.70 0.35 0.10 0.05
Sum: 1.00 E(Ret): 0.25 E(Ret): 0.20
Calculating Variance of Expected Returns:
Starcents:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Return if
State of Probability of State Expected Difference: Squared: Product:
Economy State of Economy Occurs Return: (3) - (4) (5) x (5) (2) x (6)
Recession 0.50 -0.20 0.25 -0.45 0.2025 0.10125
Boom 0.50 0.70 0.25 0.45 0.2025 0.10125
Sum: 1.00 Sum = the Variance: 0.20250
Standard Deviation: 0.45
Jmart:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Return if
State of Probability of State Expected Difference: Squared: Product:
Economy State of Economy Occurs Return: (3) - (4) (5) x (5) (2) x (6)
Recession 0.50 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.0100 0.00500
Boom 0.50 0.10 0.20 -0.10 0.0100 0.00500
Sum: 1.00 Sum is Variance: 0.01000
Standard Deviation: 0.10

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Expected Returns and Variances, Starcents and Jpod

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Portfolios

  • Portfolios are groups of assets, such as stocks and bonds, that are held by an investor.
  • One convenient way to describe a portfolio is by listing the proportion of the total value of the portfolio that is invested into each asset.
  • These proportions are called portfolio weights.
  • Portfolio weights are sometimes expressed in percentages.
  • However, in calculations, make sure you use proportions (i.e., decimals).

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Portfolios: Expected Returns

  • The expected return on a portfolio is a linear combination, or weighted average, of the expected returns on the assets in that portfolio.
  • The formula, for “n” assets, is:

In the formula: E(RP) = expected portfolio return

wi = portfolio weight for portfolio asset i

E(Ri) = expected return for portfolio asset i

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Example: Calculating Portfolio Expected Returns

Note that the portfolio weight in Jpod = 1 – portfolio weight in Starcents.

*

Sheet1

Calculating Expected Portfolio Returns:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Starcents Starcents Jpod Jpod Portfolio
Return if Portfolio Contribution Return if Portfolio Contribution Return
State of Prob. State Weight Product: State Weight Product: Sum: Product:
Economy of State Occurs in Starcents: (3) x (4) Occurs in Jpod: (6) x (7) (5) + (8) (2) x (9)
Recession 0.50 -0.20 0.50 -0.10 0.30 0.50 0.15 0.05 0.025
Boom 0.50 0.70 0.50 0.35 0.10 0.50 0.05 0.40 0.200
Sum: 1.00 Sum is Expected Portfolio Return: 0.225
Calculating Variance of Expected Portfolio Returns:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Return if
State of Prob. State Expected Difference: Squared: Product:
Economy of State Occurs: Return: (3) - (4) (5) x (5) (2) x (6)
Recession 0.50 0.05 0.225 -0.18 0.0306 0.01531
Boom 0.50 0.40 0.225 0.18 0.030625 0.01531
Sum: 1.00 Sum is Variance: 0.03063
Standard Deviation: 0.175

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Variance of Portfolio Expected Returns

  • Note: Unlike returns, portfolio variance is generally not a simple weighted average of the variances of the assets in the portfolio.
  • If there are “n” states, the formula is:
  • In the formula, VAR(RP) = variance of portfolio expected return

ps = probability of state of economy, s

E(Rp,s) = expected portfolio return in state s

E(Rp) = portfolio expected return

  • Note that the formula is like the formula for the variance of the expected return of a single asset.

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Example: Calculating Variance of Portfolio Expected Returns

  • It is possible to construct a portfolio of risky assets with zero portfolio variance! What? How? (Open this spreadsheet, scroll up, and set the weight in Starcents to 2/11ths.)
  • What happens when you use .40 as the weight in Starcents?

*

Sheet1

Calculating Expected Portfolio Returns:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10)
Starcents Starcents Jpod Jpod Portfolio
Return if Portfolio Contribution Return if Portfolio Contribution Return
State of Prob. State Weight Product: State Weight Product: Sum: Product:
Economy of State Occurs in Starcents: (3) x (4) Occurs in Jpod: (6) x (7) (5) + (8) (2) x (9)
Recession 0.50 -0.20 0.18 -0.04 0.30 0.82 0.25 0.21 0.105
Boom 0.50 0.70 0.18 0.13 0.10 0.82 0.08 0.21 0.105
Sum: 1.00 Sum is Expected Portfolio Return: 0.209
Calculating Variance of Expected Portfolio Returns:
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7)
Return if
State of Prob. State Expected Difference: Squared: Product:
Economy of State Occurs: Return: (3) - (4) (5) x (5) (2) x (6)
Recession 0.50 0.209 0.209 0.00 0.0000 0.00000
Boom 0.50 0.209 0.209 0.00 0 0.00000
Sum: 1.00 Sum is Variance: 0.00000
Standard Deviation: 0.000

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Diversification and Risks

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Diversification and Risk

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

The Fallacy of Time Diversification

  • Young people are often told that they should hold a large percent of their portfolio in stocks.
  • The advice could be correct, but often the typical argument used to support this advice is incorrect.
  • The Typical Argument: Even though stocks are more volatile, over time, the volatility “cancels out.”
  • Sounds logical, but the typical argument is incorrect.
  • This argument is the fallacy of time diversification fallacy

  • How can such a plausible argument be incorrect?

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

The Fallacy of Time Diversification

  • How can such logical-sounding advice be bad?
  • You might remember from your statistics class that we can add variances.
  • This fact means that an annual variance grows each year by multiplying the annual variance by the number of years.
  • Standard deviations cannot be added together: An annual standard deviation grows each year by the square root of the number of years.
  • As we showed earlier in the chapter, a randomly selected portfolio of large-cap stocks has an annual standard deviation of about 20%.
  • If we held this portfolio for 16 years, the standard deviation would be about 80 percent, which is 20 percent multiplied by the square root of 16.
  • Bottom line: Volatility increases over time—volatility does not “cancel out” over time.
  • Investing in equity has a greater chance of having an extremely large value AND increases the probability of ending with a really low value.


*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

The Very Definition of Risk—A Wider Range of Possible Outcomes from Holding Equity

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

So, Should Younger Investors Put a High Percent of Their Money into Equity?

  • The answer is probably still yes, but for logically sound reasons that differ from the reasoning underlying the fallacy of time diversification.
  • If you are young and your portfolio suffers a steep decline in a particular year, what could you do?
  • You could make up for this loss by changing your work habits (e.g., your type of job, hours, second job).
  • People approaching retirement have little future earning power, so a major loss in their portfolio will have a much greater impact on their wealth.
  • Thus, the portfolios of young people should contain relatively more equity (i.e., risk).

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Why Diversification Works

  • Correlation: The tendency of the returns on two assets to move together. Imperfect correlation is the key reason why diversification reduces portfolio risk as measured by the portfolio standard deviation.
  • Positively correlated assets tend to move up and down together.
  • Negatively correlated assets tend to move in opposite directions.
  • Imperfect correlation, positive or negative, is why diversification reduces portfolio risk.

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Why Diversification Works

  • The correlation coefficient is denoted by Corr(RA, RB) or simply, A,B.
  • The correlation coefficient measures correlation and ranges from -1 to 1:

-1 (perfect negative correlation)
0 (uncorrelated)
+1 (perfect positive correlation)

*

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Why Diversification Works

*

*

*

Why Diversification Works

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

*

Why Diversification Works

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

*

Calculating Portfolio Risk

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • For a portfolio of two assets, A and B, the variance of the return on the portfolio is:

Where: xA = portfolio weight of asset A

xB = portfolio weight of asset B

such that xA + xB = 1.

(Important: Recall Correlation Definition!)

*

*

The Importance of Asset Allocation

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • Suppose that as a very conservative, risk-averse investor, you decide to invest all of your money in a bond mutual fund. Very conservative, indeed?


Uh, is this decision a wise one?

*

*

Correlation and Diversification

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

*

Correlation and Diversification

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • The various combinations of risk and return available all fall on a smooth curve.
  • This curve is called an investment opportunity set, because it shows the possible combinations of risk and return available from portfolios of these two assets.
  • A portfolio that offers the highest return for its level of risk is said to be an efficient portfolio.
  • The undesirable portfolios are said to be dominated or inefficient.

*

*

More on Correlation and the Risk-Return Trade-Off

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

*

Example: Correlation and the
Risk-Return Trade-Off, Two Risky Assets

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Sheet1

Expected Standard
Inputs Return Deviation
Risky Asset 1 14.0% 20.0%
Risky Asset 2 8.0% 15.0%
Correlation 30.0%
Percentage
in Risky Standard Expected
Asset 1 Deviation Return
-60.0% 23.4% 4.4%
-50.0% 21.7% 5.0%
-40.0% 20.1% 5.6%
-30.0% 18.6% 6.2%
-20.0% 17.2% 6.8%
-10.0% 16.0% 7.4%
0.0% 15.0% 8.0%
10.0% 14.2% 8.6%
20.0% 13.7% 9.2%
30.0% 13.6% 9.8%
42.9% 13.8% 10.6%
50.0% 14.2% 11.0%
60.0% 14.9% 11.6%
70.0% 15.9% 12.2%
80.0% 17.1% 12.8%
90.0% 18.5% 13.4%
100.0% 20.0% 14.0%
110.0% 21.6% 14.6%
120.0% 23.3% 15.2%
130.0% 25.0% 15.8%
140.0% 26.8% 16.4%

Sheet1

Standard Deviation
Expected Return
Efficient Set--Two Asset Portfolio

*

*

The Importance of Asset Allocation

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • We can illustrate the importance of asset allocation with 3 assets.
  • How? Suppose we invest in three mutual funds:
  • One that contains Foreign Stocks, F
  • One that contains U.S. Stocks, S
  • One that contains U.S. Bonds, B
  • Figure 11.6 shows the results of calculating various expected returns and portfolio standard deviations with these three assets.
Expected Return Standard Deviation
Foreign Stocks, F 18% 35%
U.S. Stocks, S 12 22
U.S. Bonds, B 8 14

*

*

Risk and Return with Multiple Assets

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

Risk and Return with Multiple Assets

  • We used these formulas for portfolio return and variance:
  • But, we made a simplifying assumption. We assumed that the assets are all uncorrelated.
  • If so, the portfolio variance becomes:

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

The Markowitz Efficient Frontier

  • The Markowitz Efficient frontier is the set of portfolios with the maximum return for a given risk AND the minimum risk given a return.
  • For the plot, the upper left-hand boundary is the Markowitz efficient frontier.
  • All the other possible combinations are inefficient. That is, investors would not hold these portfolios because they could get either
  • more return for a given level of risk

or

  • less risk for a given level of return.

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • Investors face two problems with they form portfolios of multiple securities from different asset classes.
  • These are as follows: an asset allocation problem & a security selection problem.
  • The asset allocation problem involves a decision regarding what percentage should be allocated among different asset classes ( stocks, bonds, derivatives, foreign securities).
  • The security selection problem involves deciding which to pick in each class and what percentage to allocate to these securities (RIM, Royal Bank, Molson).

*

Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • Professional Investors have traditionally used modern portfolio theory to help make investment decisions.
  • This approach examines past returns, volatility and correlation to determine the optimum percentage of a portfolio to invest in to achieve an expected rate of return for a given level of risk.
  • “Modern Portfolio theory focuses on diversifying your risk away, but the crisis has shown the limits of the approach.”
  • What are the alternatives?
  • How should investors be looking to construct their portfolios?

*

Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

  • Investors should make asset allocations that give the best chance of meeting their own unique future financial commitments, rather then simply trying to maximize risk-adjusted returns.
  • Life cycle investing, takes into account the investor’s specific time horizons, something that modern portfolio theory does not take into account.
  • Controlling the overall risk level of investments to make sure it is in line with risk appetite.

*

Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Ayşe Yüce Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

*

Useful Internet Sites

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Chapter Review

  • Expected Returns and Variances
  • Expected returns
  • Calculating the variance
  • Portfolios
  • Portfolio weights
  • Portfolio expected returns
  • Portfolio variance

*

61.pdf

VALUATION AND MANAGEMENT

Investments

JORDAN MILLER DOLVIN YÜCE

third canadian edition

fundamentals of

*

*

*

Ayşe Yüce – Ryerson University

Copyright © 2012 McGraw-Hill Ryerson

Chapter Review

  • Diversification and Portfolio Risk
  • The principle of diversification
  • The fallacy of time diversification
  • Correlation and Diversification
  • Why diversification works
  • Calculating portfolio risk
  • More on correlation and the risk-return trade-off
  • The Markowitz Efficient Frontier
  • Risk and return with multiple assets

*

62.pdf

VALUATION AND MANAGEMENT

Investments

JORDAN MILLER DOLVIN YÜCE

third canadian edition

fundamentals of

[

]

å

=

´

=

n

1

s

s

i,

s

i

return

p

return

expected

Rate

Riskfree

Return

Expected

Premium

Risk

Expected

-

=

(

)

[

]

å

=

-

´

=

=

n

1

s

2

s

s

2

return

expected

return

p

σ

Variance

Variance

σ

Deviation

Standard

=

=

(1)(3)(4)(5)(6)

Return ifReturn if

State ofStateProduct:StateProduct:

EconomyOccurs(2) x (3)Occurs(2) x (5)

Recession-0.20-0.100.300.15

Boom0.700.350.100.05

Sum:E(Ret):0.25E(Ret):0.20

(1)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)

Return if

State ofStateExpectedDifference:Squared:Product:

EconomyOccursReturn:(3) - (4)(5) x (5)(2) x (6)

Recession-0.200.25-0.450.20250.10125

Boom0.700.250.450.20250.10125

Sum:0.20250

0.45

Calculating Expected Returns:

Starcents:Jpod:

(2)

1.00

Calculating Variance of Expected Returns:

Starcents:

(2)

Probability of

State of Economy

0.50

0.50

1.00Sum = the Variance:

Standard Deviation:

Probability of

State of Economy

0.50

0.50

(

)

(

)

[

]

å

=

´

=

n

1

i

i

i

P

R

E

w

R

E

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)

StarcentsStarcentsJpodJpodPortfolio

Return ifPortfolioContributionReturn ifPortfolioContributionReturn

State ofProb.StateWeightProduct:StateWeightProduct:Sum:Product:

Economyof State Occursin Starcents:(3) x (4)Occursin Jpod:(6) x (7)(5) + (8)(2) x (9)

Recession0.50-0.200.50-0.100.300.500.150.050.025

Boom0.500.700.500.350.100.500.050.400.200

Sum:1.000.225

Calculating Expected Portfolio Returns:

Sum is Expected Portfolio Return:

(

)

(

)

(

)

{

}

[

]

å

=

-

´

=

n

1

s

2

P

s

p,

s

P

R

E

R

E

p

R

VAR

(1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)

Return if

State ofProb.StateExpectedDifference:Squared:Product:

Economyof State Occurs:Return:(3) - (4)(5) x (5)(2) x (6)

Recession0.500.2090.2090.000.00000.00000

Boom0.500.2090.2090.0000.00000

Sum:1.00Sum is Variance:0.00000

0.000Standard Deviation:

Calculating Variance of Expected Portfolio Returns:

)

R

CORR(R

σ

σ

x

2x

σ

x

σ

x

σ

B)

COV(A,

x

2x

σ

x

σ

x

σ

B

A

B

A

B

A

2

B

2

B

2

A

2

A

2

p

B

A

2

B

2

B

2

A

2

A

2

p

+

+

=

+

+

=

ExpectedStandard

InputsReturnDeviation

Risky Asset 114.0%20.0%

Risky Asset 28.0%15.0%

Correlation30.0%

Efficient Set--Two Asset Portfolio

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

0%5%10%15%20%25%30%

Standard Deviation

Expected Return

2

B

2

B

2

S

2

S

2

F

2

F

2

p

B

S

B

S

B

S

B

F

B

F

B

F

S

F

S

F

S

F

2

B

2

B

2

S

2

S

2

F

2

F

2

p

B

B

S

S

F

F

p

σ

x

σ

x

σ

x

σ

)

R

CORR(R

σ

σ

x

2x

)

R

CORR(R

σ

σ

x

2x

)

R

CORR(R

σ

σ

x

2x

σ

x

σ

x

σ

x

σ

R

x

R

x

R

x

r

+

+

=

+

+

+

+

+

=

+

+

=