Accounting project
Activity-Based Costing, Lean Operations, and the Costs of Quality
Chapter 4
1
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
1
Objective 1
Develop and use departmental overhead rates to allocate indirect costs
2
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
2
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Why and How do Companies Refine Their Cost Allocation Systems?
Why refine?
Mismatching resources
Cost distortion
Who can refine?
Manufacturing operations
Service companies and governmental agencies
3
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
3
Plantwide Overhead Rate – example in textbook
Using one predetermined manufacturing overhead rate for all operations
Predetermined MOH rate =
Total estimated manufacturing overhead costs Total estimated amount of the allocation base
Predetermined MOH rate =
$1,000,000 62,500 DL hours
= $16 per DL hour
4
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
4
Plantwide Overhead Rate
Using one predetermined manufacturing overhead rate to allocate MOH to units
5
Plantwide
Overhead Rate
Actual Use of
Allocation Base
MOH
Allocated to
One Unit
Elliptical
×
$16 per DL hour
10 DL hours
=
$160
Treadmill
×
$16 per DL hour
10 DL hours
=
$160
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
5
Departmental Overhead Rates
Separate predetermined manufacturing overhead rates for each department
| Manufacturing Plant with $1,000,000 of total estimated MOH and 2 departments | |
| Machining Department ($400,000 of MOH) | Assembly Department ($600,000 of MOH) |
| $400,000 ÷ departmental allocation base yields a MOH rate for this department ONLY | $600,000 ÷ departmental allocation base yields a MOH rate for this department ONLY |
6
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
6
Departmental Overhead Rates
When to use
Departments incur different amounts and types of MOH
Different jobs or products use the department resources to a different extent
7
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
7
Departmental Overhead Rates – Example on pages 182 - 187
| Department | Total Departmental Manufacturing Overhead Costs | Total Departmental Labor Hours | Departmental Overhead Rate |
| Machining | $400,000 | 12,500 hrs | |
| Assembly | $600,000 | 50,000 hrs | |
| TOTAL | $1,000,000 |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
8
Departmental Overhead Rates – Example on pages 182 - 187
| Department | Total Departmental Manufacturing Overhead Costs | Total Departmental Labor Hours | Departmental Overhead Rate |
| Machining | $400,000 | 12,500 hrs | $400,000/12,500 = $32/DLH |
| Assembly | $600,000 | 50,000 hrs | $600,000/50,000 = $12/DLH |
| TOTAL | $1,000,000 |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
9
Departmental Overhead Rates Example - Exhibit 4-8 (p.186) – Ellipticals
| Department | Departmental Overhead Rate | Actual Use of Departmental Allocation Base | MOH Allocated to One Elliptical | ||
| Machining | $32 per DL hour | × | 1 DL hours | = | |
| Assembly | $12 per DL hour | × | 9 DL hours | = | |
| Total |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
10
Departmental Overhead Rates Example - Exhibit 4-8 (p.186) – Ellipticals
| Department | Departmental Overhead Rate | Actual Use of Departmental Allocation Base | MOH Allocated to One Elliptical | ||
| Machining | $32 per DL hour | × | 1 DL hours | = | $32 |
| Assembly | $12 per DL hour | × | 9 DL hours | = | 108 |
| Total | $140 |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
11
Departmental Overhead Rates Example - Exhibit 4-9 (p.186) - Treadmills
| Department | Departmental Overhead Rate | Actual Use of Departmental Allocation Base | MOH Allocated to OneTreadmill | ||
| Machining | $32 per DL hour | × | 4DL hours | = | |
| Assembly | $12 per DL hour | × | 6DL hours | = | |
| Total |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
12
Departmental Overhead Rates Example - Exhibit 4-9 (p.186) - Treadmills
| Department | Departmental Overhead Rate | Actual Use of Departmental Allocation Base | MOH Allocated to OneTreadmill | ||
| Machining | $32 per DL hour | × | 4DL hours | = | $128 |
| Assembly | $12 per DL hour | × | 6DL hours | = | 72 |
| Total | $200 |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
13
Departmental Overhead Rates Example - Exhibit 4-11 (p.187)
| Plantwide Overhead Rate MOH Allocation (from Exhibit 4-2) | Departmental Overhead Rates MOH Allocation (from Exhibit 4-10) | Amount of Cost Distortion | |
| Elliptical | $ 160 | $ 140 | $20 overcosted |
| Treadmill | $ 160 | $ 200 | $40 undercosted |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
14
Now turn to S4-3
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
15
S4-3 - Compute Departmental Overhead Rates
What is Gerbig’s plantwide overhead rate?
$3,762,000 manufacturing overhead
17,100 machine hours
= $220 per machine hour
Total estimated manufacturing overhead costs Total estimated amount of the allocation base
16
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
16
S4-3 (cont.)
Calculate the departmental overhead rates for Gerbig’s three production lines. Round all answers to the nearest cent.
| Department | Overhead Cost | Machine Hours | Overhead Rate |
| Potato chips | $2,147,000 | 11,300 MH | |
| Corn chips | $959,000 | 2,600 MH | |
| Cheese puffs | $ 656,000 | 3,200 MH |
17
$190.00
$368.85
$205.00
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
17
S4-3 (cont.)
Which products had been overcosted by the plantwide rate? Which products had been undercosted by the plantwide rate?
Plantwide Rate = $220.00 per machine hour
Departmental Rate:
18
Potato
Chips
= $190.00
Overcosted
Corn Chips
= 368.85
Undercosted
Cheese
Puffs
= 205.00
Overcosted
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
18
Objective 2
Develop and use activity-based costing (ABC) to allocate indirect costs
19
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
19
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Activity-Based Costing
Allocates indirect costs to production
Focuses on activities and costs of activities
Separate allocation rate for each activity
Manufacturing
Activities
Machine Setup
Materials
Handling
Fabricating
Parts
Supervising
Assembly
Inspecting
Products
Packaging
Products
20
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
20
| Activity | MOH Costs for the Activity | Total Activity Cost Pool |
| Machine Setup | Indirect labor to set up machines | $80,000 |
| Materials Handling | Forklifts, gas, operators’ wages | 200,000 |
| Fabricating Parts | Machine lease payments, electricity, repairs | 300,000 |
| Supervising Assembly | Production engineers’ labor | 150,000 |
| Inspecting | Testing equipment, inspection labor | 170,000 |
| Packaging | Packaging equipment | 100,000 |
| $1,000,000 |
Activity-Based Costing Steps
Step 1: Identify and estimate indirect costs
21
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
21
Activity-Based Costing Steps
Step 2: Select an allocation base for each activity
22
| Activity | Allocation base | Total Cost Pool | Total Estimated Amount of Allocation Base |
| Machine Setup | Number of setups | $80,000 | 8,000 setups |
| Materials Handling | Number of parts moved | 200,000 | 400,000 parts |
| Fabricating Parts | Machine hours | 300,000 | 12,500 machine hours (MH) |
| Supervising Assembly | Direct labor hours | 150,000 | DL hours |
| Inspecting | Number of inspections | 170,000 | Inspections |
| Packaging | Cubic feet packaged | 100,000 | Cubic feet |
| $1,000,000 |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
22
Activity-Based Costing Steps
Step 3: Compute cost allocation rate for each activity
23
| Activity | Allocation base | Total Cost Pool | Cost Allocation Rate |
| Machine Set-up | Number of set-ups | $80,000 | $80,000 / 8000 = $10 per setup |
| Materials Handling | Number of parts moved | 200,000 | 200,000/ 400,000 = $0.50 per part |
| Fabricating Parts | Machine hours | 300,000 | 300,000/ 12,500 = $24 per MH |
| Supervising Assembly | Direct labor hours | 150,000 | 150,000 / 50,000 = $3 per DLH |
| Inspecting | Number of inspections | 170,000 | 170,000 / 34,000 = $5 per inspection |
| Packaging | Cubic feet packaged | 100,000 | 100,000 / 400,000 =$0.25 per cubic foot |
| 1,000,000 |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
23
Step 4: Allocate some manufacturing overhead for each activity to the individual jobs that use the activities.
Activity-Based Costing Steps
24
Info for 1 Elliptical
Activity
Activity Cost
Allocation
Rate
Actual Use of
Activity
Allocation Base (collected
on job)
MOH Allocated
to One
object
Machine Setup
$10 per setup
×
2 setups
=
$20
Materials
Handling
$0.50 per part
×
20 parts
=
10
Fabricating
$24 per machine
hour
×
1 machine hour
=
24
Supervising
Assembly
$3 per DL hour
×
9 DL hours
=
27
Inspecting
$5 per inspection
×
3 inspections
=
15
Packaging
$0.25 per cubic
foot
×
52 cubic feet
=
13
Total
$109
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
24
Step 4: Allocate some manufacturing overhead for each activity to the individual jobs that use the activities.
Activity-Based Costing Steps
25
Info for 1 Treadmill
Activity
Activity Cost
Allocation
Rate
Actual Use of
Activity
Allocation Base (collected
on job)
MOH Allocated
to One
object
Machine Setup
$10 per setup
×
4 setups
=
$40
Materials
Handling
$0.50 per part
×
26 parts
=
13
Fabricating
$24 per machine
hour
×
4 machine hour
=
96
Supervising
Assembly
$3 per DL hour
×
6 DL hours
=
18
Inspecting
$5 per inspection
×
6 inspections
=
30
Packaging
$0.25 per cubic
foot
×
60 cubic feet
=
15
Total
$212
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
25
Examples of Cost Drivers
| Activities: | Cost Drivers: |
| Material purchasing | # of purchase orders |
| Material handling | # of parts |
| Production scheduling | # of batches |
| Quality inspections | # of inspections |
| Photocopying | # of pages copied |
| Warranty service | # of service calls |
26
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
26
Now turn to E4-36B ABC Example
27
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
27
E4-36B ABC Example
Step 1: Identify each activity and estimate the total indirect costs of each activity.
Material handling $6,400
Machine setup $9,000
Insertion of parts $54,400
Finishing $89,700
28
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
28
E4-36B Example (cont.)
Step 2: Select an allocation base for each activity and estimate the total that will be used during the year.
| Activity | Total Est. Cost | Est. Quant. of Cost Allocation Base | |
| Mat. handling | $6,400 | ÷ | 3,200 parts |
| Machine setups | $9,000 | ÷ | 25 setups |
| Insertion of parts | $54,400 | ÷ | 3,200 parts |
| Finishing | $89,700 | ÷ | 2,300 hrs |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
29
E4-36B Example (cont.)
Step 3. Compute cost allocation rate for each. activity
| Activity | Total Est. Cost | Est. Quant. of Cost Allocation Base | Allocation Rate | |
| Mat. handling | $6,400 | ÷ | 3,200 parts | |
| Machine setups | 9,000 | ÷ | 25 setups | |
| Insertion of parts | 54,400 | ÷ | 3,200 parts | |
| Finishing | 89,700 | ÷ | 2,300 hrs |
$ 2.00/part
$360.00/setup
$17.00/part
$39.00/hr
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
30
E4-36B Example (cont.)
Step 4. Allocate some manufacturing overhead from each activity to the individual jobs that use the activities.
| Job 420 | |||
| Material handling | 250 parts | $ 2.00 | $ 500 |
| Machine setup | 3 setups | 360.00 | 1,080 |
| Insertion of parts | 250 parts | 17.00 | 4,250 |
| Finishing | 130 finishing hours | 39.00 | 5,070 |
| Total | $10,900 |
31
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
31
E4-36B Example (cont.)
Step 4. Allocate some manufacturing overhead from each activity to the individual jobs that use the activities.
| Job 420 | |||
| Material handling | 250 parts | $ 2.00 | $ 500 |
| Machine setup | 3 setups | 360.00 | 1080 |
| Insertion of parts | 250 parts | 17.00 | 4,250 |
| Finishing | 130 finishing hours | 39.00 | 5,070 |
| Total | $10,900 |
32
| Job 510 | |||
| Material handling | 425 parts | $ 2.00 | $850 |
| Machine setup | 6 setups | 360.00 | 2,160 |
| Insertion of parts | 425 parts | 17.00 | 7,225 |
| Finishing | 320 finishing hours | 39.00 | 12,480 |
| Total | $22,715 |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
32
Cost Hierarchy
33
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
33
Now turn to S4-9
34
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
34
S4-9 Classifying Costs Within the Cost Hierarchy
| Each container is cut from the mold once the plastic has cooled and hardened. | |
| Patents are obtained for each new type of container mold. | |
| Plastic resins are used as the main direct material for the containers. | |
| A plant manager oversees the entire manufacturing operation. | |
| The sales force incurs travel expenses to attend various trade shows throughout the country to market the containers. |
35
Unit-level
Unit-level
Product-level
Facility-level
Facility-level
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
35
S4-9 (cont.)
| Each container product line has a product line manager. | |
| The extrusion machine is calibrated for each batch of containers made. | |
| Each type of container has its own unique molds. | |
| Routine maintenance is performed on the extrusion machines | |
| Rent is paid for the building that houses the manufacturing processes. |
36
Facility-level
Facility-level
Product-level
Product-level
Batch-level
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
36
Objective 3
Understand the benefits and limitations of ABC/ABM systems
37
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
37
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Activity-Based Management (ABM)
Using ABC information to make decisions
Pricing and product mix
Cost cutting
Planning and control
38
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
38
Pricing and Product Mix Decisions
Change the prices for products after identifying the different total cost
Decide to market the higher profitability product
Shift the product mix away from less-profitable products
39
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
39
Cutting Costs
Analyze costs in value chain
Value-added activities
Non–value-added activities
Value-added vs. non–value-added
40
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
40
Planning and Control Decisions
Uses the costs of activities to create budgets
Compare with actual activities to see if goals are being met
41
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
41
Using ABC Outside of Manufacturing
Merchandising and service: find the most profitable product or service
Manufacturers: allocate operating activities
42
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
42
Sustainability and Refined Costing Systems
Environmental overhead should be allocated to different activities that drive their costs.
Creates better transparency
43
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
43
Cost Benefit Test
Do the benefits of adopting ABC/ABM exceed the costs?
Benefits are higher for companies in competitive markets:
Accurate product cost information is essential
ABM can pinpoint cost savings opportunities
Benefits are higher when risk of cost distortion high:
Many different products, many different types/amounts of resources
High indirect costs
High- and low-volume products
44
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
44
Costs of Adopting ABC
Generally lower with
Accounting and information system expertise to develop the system
Information technology
Are companies glad they adopted ABC?
89% of the companies say that it was worth the cost
Not a cure-all, helps managers understand costs better
45
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
45
Signs the Old System May Be Distorting Costs
Cost system may need repair when
Managers don’t understand costs and profits
Bids are lost when expected to win
Win bids expected to lose
Competitors price similar products much higher or much lower
The cost system may be outdated if there is a diversified product line
46
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
46
Objective 4
Describe lean operations
47
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
47
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Traditional Production Systems
Keep large inventories on hand
Problems:
Storage cost
Hide quality
Bottlenecks and obsolete products
Solution: Lean Productions System
48
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
48
Lean Thinking
Philosophy and a business strategy
Primary goal: eliminate waste and cost
Focus of JIT
Purchase raw materials just in time for production
Finish goods just in time for delivery
49
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
49
Lean Production/Just-in-Time
Common characteristics of Just-in-Time (JIT)
Production occurs in self-contained cells
Broad employee roles
Small batches produced just in time – “demand-pull system”
Shortened setup times
Shortened manufacturing cycle times
Emphasis on quality
Supply-chain management
50
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
50
Drawbacks to Lean Production Systems
Vulnerable when problems strike suppliers or distributors
Examples
Delays in delivery
Personnel problems – union strikes
Shortage of parts due to recalled products
Weather related issues
51
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
51
Sustainability and Lean Thinking
Both seek to reduce waste
Lean focus on internal
Green focus on external
Lean and Green
52
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
52
Objective 5
Describe and use the cost of quality framework
53
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
53
Copyright © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
Total Quality Management
Goal: Provide customers with superior products and services
Continuous improvement
More investment up front to generate savings in the back end of the value chain
54
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
54
Four Types of Quality Costs
Prevention costs – avoid poor quality goods or services
Employee training
Improved materials
Preventive maintenance
Appraisal costs – detect poor quality goods or services
Inspection throughout production
Inspection of final product
Product testing
55
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
55
Four Types of Quality Costs (cont.)
Internal failure costs – avoid poor quality goods or services before delivery to customers
Production loss caused by downtime
Rejected product units
External failure costs – incurred after defective product is delivered
Lost profits from lost customers
Warranty costs
Service costs at customer sites
Sales returns due to quality problems
56
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
56
Non-Manufacturing Costs of Quality
Service firms and merchandising companies also incur costs of quality
Prevention
Professional training to their staff
Develop standardized service checklists
Appraisal costs
Review work continuously
Inspect before releasing
57
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
57
Cost of Quality Report
Identifies, categorizes, and quantifies all of the costs it incurs relating to quality.
Calculate the percentage of total costs of quality that are incurred in each cost category
Use as a framework for decisions
58
Prevention Costs
Appraisal Costs
Internal Failure Costs
External Failure Costs
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
58
59
Exhibit 4-27
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
59
Now turn to E4-34A
60
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
60
E4-34A
Prevention costs
Training employees in TQM
Training suppliers in TQM
Identifying preferred suppliers who commit to on-time delivery of perfect quality materials
61
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
61
E4-34A (cont.)
Appraisal costs
Strength testing one item from each batch of panels
Avoid inspection of raw materials
Internal failure costs
Avoid rework and spoilage
62
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
62
E4-34 (cont.)
External failure costs
Avoid lost profits from lost sales due to disappointed customers
Avoid warranty costs
63
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
63
E4-34A (cont.)
| Costs of Adopting New Quality Program: | |
| Prevention costs: | |
| Training employees in TQM | $ 29,000 |
| Training suppliers in TQM | 33,000 |
| Identifying preferred suppliers | 59,000 |
| Appraisal costs: | |
| Strength testing | 64,000 |
| Savings on inspection of raw materials | (51,000) |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
64
E4-34A (cont.)
| Quality report (continued from prior slide): | |
| Internal failure costs: | |
| Savings on rework and spoilage | (65,000) |
| External failure costs: | |
| Savings on formerly lost profits | (92,000) |
| Savings on warranty costs | (16,000) |
| Net (Benefit) | ($39,000) |
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.
65
End of Chapter 4
66
Copyright © 2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall.