The Leader as Communicator

Assignment

Components

Unsatisfactory

< 77%

(C- to C)

Emerging

78 – 82% (C+ to B-)

Proficient

83 – 89% (B to B+)

Exemplar

90 – 100 % (A- to A)

Score

To calculate score:

(% / 100) x max pts.

e.g. (80% /

100) x 12

= 9.6

Explain your

organization’s current structure, workforce diversity, market/customer diversity, and communications technology.

(Program Outcomes

[PO]: 1.1, 1.2, 2.2, 2.3,

3.2, 3.3, 4.1, 4.2)

Explanation of your organization’s current

structure, workforce

diversity, market/customer diversity, and communications technology is present, but it is mostly unclear and illogical. It

lacks detail and is not fully based on reliable facts but

is based on personal

opinion.

Explanation of your

organization’s current structure, workforce diversity, market/customer diversity, and communications technology is present, and it is only partially unclear, illogical, and detailed and is mostly based on reliable facts.

Explanation of your

organization’s current structure, workforce diversity, market/customer diversity, and communications technology is present, and it is clear, concise, and correct and is based on reliable facts.

Explanation of your

organization’s current structure, workforce diversity, market/customer diversity, and communications technology is present, and it is clear, concise, and correct and is based on reliable facts.

In addition, explanation of the effectiveness of the current practices in these areas is included.

/76

pts.

Identify what will be the

economic, social, demographic, and workforce parameters that are expected to be in the U.S. in the year

2020.

Explain how those trends will or will not be reflected in your selected organization. (PO: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.3,

3.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3)

Identification of what will be the economic, social,

demographic and workforce

parameters that are expected to be in the U.S. in the year 2020 is present, but it is mostly unclear and incorrect and is not fully based on credible sources but rather on personal opinion.

Explanation of how those trends will or will not be reflected in one’s selected organization is present, but it is mostly illogical, lacks

detail, and is not fully based on credible sources but rather on personal opinion.

Identification of what will be the economic,

social, demographic,

and workforce parameters that are expected to be in the U.S. in the year 2020 is present, and it is only somewhat unclear and correct and is mostly based on credible sources.

Explanation of how those trends will or will not be reflected in one’s selected organization is present, and it is only somewhat logical and detailed, and it is mostly based on credible sources.

Identification of what will be the economic,

social, demographic,

and workforce parameters that are expected to be in the U.S. in the year 2020 is clear, concise, and accurate and is based on credible sources.

Explanation of how those trends will or will not be reflected in one’s selected organization is clear, concise, logical, and detailed and is based on credible sources.

Identification of what will be the economic,

social, demographic,

and workforce parameters that are expected to be in the U.S. in the year 2020 is clear, concise, and accurate and is based on credible sources.

Explanation of how those trends will or will not be reflected in one’s selected organization is clear, concise, logical, and detailed and is based on credible sources.

In addition, several insightful examples are given.

/68

pts.

Synthesize data to

recommend leader, organizational, and workforce trends to be considered in the larger macro environment. (PO: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2,

2.3, 3.1, 3.2. 3.3, 4.1,

4.2, 4.3)

Synthesis of data and

recommendation of changes for the leader as well as organizational and workforce practices that need to be considered in the larger macro environment is present, but it is mostly unclear and illogical. It lacks detail and is mostly not based on sound research in the

industry but rather personal opinion.

Synthesis of data and

recommendation of changes for the leader as well as organizational and

workforce practices that need to be considered

in the larger macro environment is present,

and it is only somewhat

unclear, illogical, and detailed and is mostly based on sound research in the industry.

Synthesis of data and recommendation of

changes for the leader

as well as organizational and workforce practices that need to be considered

in the larger macro environment is present, and it is clear, concise, logical and is based on sound research in the industry.

Synthesis of data and

recommendation of changes for the leader as well as organizational and

workforce practices that need to be considered

in the larger macro environment is present

and it is clear, concise,

and logical and is based on sound research in

the industry.

In addition, several insightful examples are given.

/88

pts.

Identify related

outcomes for each specific topic (e.g., leaders, competencies, and preparedness). (PO: 1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.3,

3.3, 4.1, 4.2, 4.3)

Identification of related

outcomes for each specific topic is present, but it is mostly unclear and illogical and lacks detail. It is mostly not based on reliable sources in the industry but rather on personal opinion.

Identification of related

outcomes for each specific topic is present, and it is only somewhat unclear, illogical, and detailed. It is mostly based on reliable sources in the industry.

Identification of related

outcomes for each specific topic is present, and it is clear, concise, and logical. It is based on reliable sources in the industry.

Identification of related

outcomes for each specific topic is present, and it is clear, concise, and logical. It is based on reliable sources in the industry.

In addition, several insightful examples are given.

/40

pts.

Write in a clear, concise,

and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

Writing is unclear and

disorganized and rereading to solidify understanding is frequently necessary. Although an attempt at ethical scholarship is attempted, it is sloppy or incomplete throughout. Spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors severely interfere with readers’ comprehension.

Writing is somewhat

clear and is somewhat organized although rereading to solidify understanding is occasionally necessary. It demonstrates an attempt at ethical

scholarship in accurate representation and

attribution of sources,

but errors are occasional or minor. Writing has good spelling, grammar, and punctuation, but errors somewhat interfere with readers’ comprehension.

Writing is generally

clear and in an organized manner. It demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and generally displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation. Errors are few and isolated and do not interfere with readers’ comprehension.

Writing is clear and

concise and in an organized manner; demonstrates ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; and displays accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

/28

pts.

Subtotal

Timeliness

Late Work penalty:

Total Score

/300 pts.