writing
2 years ago
5
Week7presentationrubricrevised2024.docx
group5article.pdf
- Group5article.html
Week7presentationrubricrevised2024.docx
Week 7 Students Presentation Rubric
Group Number: Team Members:
|
Content |
% |
Grading/Comments |
|
Introduction |
5% |
|
|
1 Provide a very brief summary (3-4 sentences) of what the study was about and purpose if stated. Include the research question(s) if available. 2 Define the target population to which the statistical analysis can be generalized. Describe the sampling approach and note whether it is representative. 3 What were the hypothesis advanced by the researchers / authors? 4 Provide a clear definition of the outcome/dependent variables and a short description of the instrument used to measure them. What was the level of measurement? 5 Provide a clear definition of the independent/predictor variables and a short description of the instrument(s) used to measure them. What was the level of measurement for each variable? 6 Describe the type of study design used. How many groups were included? How many subjects were included overall? 7 Describe the statistical tests used. List each and explain why used. What was the level of significance assigned? Was the test chosen appropriate based on the research question and procedures? 8 Report the results with significance levels (p values) and identify hypothesis decisions. What do the results mean? Are there any clinical implications for nurse practitioners given the results? 9 Describe one ethical implication that pertains to the overall research design or data analysis in your article. 10 Describe how the aggregate data in your article would guide population-based disease prevention. What level of prevention is applicable if any all? |
75% |
|
|
Peer Participation in presentation---
a. Demonstrated accountability to team work responsibilities and timeline b. Produced high quality work c. Was respectful throughout process d. Provided thoughtful feedback e. Demonstrated professional communication f. Worked well with others, flexible in assignment process g. Valued diversity of ideas
|
7% |
|
|
Presentation Style & Resources:
1. Organization: 3% (content is covered in an orderly manner; ideas are well developed and show evidence of critical thinking skills) 2. Conventions: 3% (grammar, mechanics, spelling, sentence formation) 3. Time limit ~15 minutes: 2% 4. Professionalism of presentation: 3% (professional speech and presentation skills, PowerPoint quality) 5. APA format: 2% |
13% |
|
|
Total |
100% |
|
group5article.pdf
Advertisement
Abstract
Background:
Substitutive hospital-level care in a patient's home may reduce cost, health care use,
and readmissions while improving patient experience, although evidence from
randomized controlled trials in the United States is lacking.
Objective:
To compare outcomes of home hospital versus usual hospital care for patients
requiring admission.
Design:
Randomized controlled trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03203759)
Setting:
Academic medical center and community hospital.
Patients:
91 adults (43 home and 48 control) admitted via the emergency department with
selected acute conditions.
Intervention:
Acute care at home, including nurse and physician home visits, intravenous
medications, remote monitoring, video communication, and point-of-care testing.
Measurements:
ACP Journals
The primary outcome was the total direct cost of the acute care episode (sum of
costs for nonphysician labor, supplies, medications, and diagnostic tests). Secondary
outcomes included health care use and physical activity during the acute care
episode and at 30 days.
Results:
The adjusted mean cost of the acute care episode was 38% (95% CI, 24% to 49%)
lower for home patients than control patients. Compared with usual care patients,
home patients had fewer laboratory orders (median per admission, 3 vs. 15), imaging
studies (median, 14% vs. 44%), and consultations (median, 2% vs. 31%). Home patients
spent a smaller proportion of the day sedentary (median, 12% vs. 23%) or lying down
(median, 18% vs. 55%) and were readmitted less frequently within 30 days (7% vs.
23%).
Limitation:
The study involved 2 sites, a small number of home physicians, and a small sample of
highly selected patients (with a 63% refusal rate among potentially eligible patients);
these factors may limit generalizability.
Conclusion:
Substitutive home hospitalization reduced cost, health care use, and readmissions
while increasing physical activity compared with usual hospital care.
Primary Funding Source:
Partners HealthCare Center for Population Health and internal departmental funds.
Get full access to this article
View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.
GET ACCESS
Supplemental Material
Supplement. Trial Protocol and Amendments
References
SHOW ALL REFERENCES
Comments
0 Comments
Sign In to Submit A Comment
Advertisement
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. FastStats: health expenditures. 2017.
Accessed at www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/health-expenditures.htm on 3 December 2018.
Google Scholar
Hung WW, Ross JS, Farber J, et al. Evaluation of the Mobile Acute Care of the Elderly
(MACE) service. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:990-6. [PMID: 23608775] doi: 10.1001/jamaintern
med.2013.478
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar
Horwitz LI, Green J, Bradley EH. US emergency department performance on wait time and
length of visit. Ann Emerg Med. 2010;55:133-41. [PMID: 19796844] doi: 10.1016/j.annemergme
d.2009.07.023
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar
Krumholz HM. Post-hospital syndrome—an acquired, transient condition of generalized
risk. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:100-2. [PMID: 23301730] doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1212324
Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar
1.
2.
3.
4.
View full text | Download PDF